Unobtrusive Maintenance: Temporal Complexity, Latent Category Control and the Stalled Emergence of the Cleantech Sector

Charlene Zietsma, Trish Ruebottom, Angelique Slade Shantz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Disruptive innovation changes the basis of competition within an industry and poses substantial threats for market incumbents. While researchers have focused on whether incumbents can successfully adapt, we know little about how potentially disruptive innovation may be avoided. Studying clean technology in Canada, we examine incumbent resistance when potentially disruptive technologies are seen as socially beneficial. We identify actions taken by incumbents and other socio-technical regime actors to respond to the issue while simultaneously enacting legitimate stabilizing mechanisms within the regime’s institutional infrastructure. Specifically, temporal and resource-based actions led to temporal complexity for disruptive cleantech entrepreneurs, and evaluation structuring work led to latent control of the cleantech category, privileging incumbents and resulting in unobtrusive maintenance. Our findings contribute to the disruptive innovation and institutional theory literatures by showing how disruption may be stalled by the enactment of legitimate elements of the institutional infrastructure rather than direct institutional defence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1242-1277
Number of pages36
JournalJournal of Management Studies
Volume55
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Innovation
Environmental technology
Incumbents
Industry
Disruptive innovation
Institutional infrastructure

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{e1257ee8255b4659a480a8bb00666c67,
title = "Unobtrusive Maintenance: Temporal Complexity, Latent Category Control and the Stalled Emergence of the Cleantech Sector",
abstract = "Disruptive innovation changes the basis of competition within an industry and poses substantial threats for market incumbents. While researchers have focused on whether incumbents can successfully adapt, we know little about how potentially disruptive innovation may be avoided. Studying clean technology in Canada, we examine incumbent resistance when potentially disruptive technologies are seen as socially beneficial. We identify actions taken by incumbents and other socio-technical regime actors to respond to the issue while simultaneously enacting legitimate stabilizing mechanisms within the regime’s institutional infrastructure. Specifically, temporal and resource-based actions led to temporal complexity for disruptive cleantech entrepreneurs, and evaluation structuring work led to latent control of the cleantech category, privileging incumbents and resulting in unobtrusive maintenance. Our findings contribute to the disruptive innovation and institutional theory literatures by showing how disruption may be stalled by the enactment of legitimate elements of the institutional infrastructure rather than direct institutional defence.",
author = "Charlene Zietsma and Trish Ruebottom and {Slade Shantz}, Angelique",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/joms.12350",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "1242--1277",
journal = "Journal of Management Studies",
issn = "0022-2380",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

Unobtrusive Maintenance : Temporal Complexity, Latent Category Control and the Stalled Emergence of the Cleantech Sector. / Zietsma, Charlene; Ruebottom, Trish; Slade Shantz, Angelique.

In: Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 55, No. 7, 11.2018, p. 1242-1277.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unobtrusive Maintenance

T2 - Temporal Complexity, Latent Category Control and the Stalled Emergence of the Cleantech Sector

AU - Zietsma, Charlene

AU - Ruebottom, Trish

AU - Slade Shantz, Angelique

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - Disruptive innovation changes the basis of competition within an industry and poses substantial threats for market incumbents. While researchers have focused on whether incumbents can successfully adapt, we know little about how potentially disruptive innovation may be avoided. Studying clean technology in Canada, we examine incumbent resistance when potentially disruptive technologies are seen as socially beneficial. We identify actions taken by incumbents and other socio-technical regime actors to respond to the issue while simultaneously enacting legitimate stabilizing mechanisms within the regime’s institutional infrastructure. Specifically, temporal and resource-based actions led to temporal complexity for disruptive cleantech entrepreneurs, and evaluation structuring work led to latent control of the cleantech category, privileging incumbents and resulting in unobtrusive maintenance. Our findings contribute to the disruptive innovation and institutional theory literatures by showing how disruption may be stalled by the enactment of legitimate elements of the institutional infrastructure rather than direct institutional defence.

AB - Disruptive innovation changes the basis of competition within an industry and poses substantial threats for market incumbents. While researchers have focused on whether incumbents can successfully adapt, we know little about how potentially disruptive innovation may be avoided. Studying clean technology in Canada, we examine incumbent resistance when potentially disruptive technologies are seen as socially beneficial. We identify actions taken by incumbents and other socio-technical regime actors to respond to the issue while simultaneously enacting legitimate stabilizing mechanisms within the regime’s institutional infrastructure. Specifically, temporal and resource-based actions led to temporal complexity for disruptive cleantech entrepreneurs, and evaluation structuring work led to latent control of the cleantech category, privileging incumbents and resulting in unobtrusive maintenance. Our findings contribute to the disruptive innovation and institutional theory literatures by showing how disruption may be stalled by the enactment of legitimate elements of the institutional infrastructure rather than direct institutional defence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054172897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054172897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/joms.12350

DO - 10.1111/joms.12350

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85054172897

VL - 55

SP - 1242

EP - 1277

JO - Journal of Management Studies

JF - Journal of Management Studies

SN - 0022-2380

IS - 7

ER -