Unpacking LogM: Toward a More General Theory of Party System Density

David Lowery, Simon Otjes, Sergiu Gherghina, Arjen Van Witteloostuijn, Gabor Peli, Holly Brasher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The standard model of political party system density combines two traditions to explain why some countries have more political parties than others, one tradition that emphasizes social cleavages and another that emphasizes electoral institutions, especially district magnitude. Despite its considerable success, there are several reasons to be less than fully satisfied with the standard model. We examine two of these problems associated with the scope of strategic voting and the functional form of the specification used to test the model. In doing so, we contrast the standard interpretation with an organizational ecology model that accounts for what the standard model did so well, but also accounts for important anomalies it ignores. We reexamine some of the key analyses that have been used to test the standard model to assess the severity of its limitations and the utility of the rival organizational ecology account.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)921-935
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Political Science
Volume54
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2010

Fingerprint

party system
ecology
political system
voting
district
interpretation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Lowery, D., Otjes, S., Gherghina, S., Van Witteloostuijn, A., Peli, G., & Brasher, H. (2010). Unpacking LogM: Toward a More General Theory of Party System Density. American Journal of Political Science, 54(4), 921-935. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00469.x
Lowery, David ; Otjes, Simon ; Gherghina, Sergiu ; Van Witteloostuijn, Arjen ; Peli, Gabor ; Brasher, Holly. / Unpacking LogM : Toward a More General Theory of Party System Density. In: American Journal of Political Science. 2010 ; Vol. 54, No. 4. pp. 921-935.
@article{cb0172005fa348239d962d7f2b24a075,
title = "Unpacking LogM: Toward a More General Theory of Party System Density",
abstract = "The standard model of political party system density combines two traditions to explain why some countries have more political parties than others, one tradition that emphasizes social cleavages and another that emphasizes electoral institutions, especially district magnitude. Despite its considerable success, there are several reasons to be less than fully satisfied with the standard model. We examine two of these problems associated with the scope of strategic voting and the functional form of the specification used to test the model. In doing so, we contrast the standard interpretation with an organizational ecology model that accounts for what the standard model did so well, but also accounts for important anomalies it ignores. We reexamine some of the key analyses that have been used to test the standard model to assess the severity of its limitations and the utility of the rival organizational ecology account.",
author = "David Lowery and Simon Otjes and Sergiu Gherghina and {Van Witteloostuijn}, Arjen and Gabor Peli and Holly Brasher",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00469.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "921--935",
journal = "American Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0092-5853",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Lowery, D, Otjes, S, Gherghina, S, Van Witteloostuijn, A, Peli, G & Brasher, H 2010, 'Unpacking LogM: Toward a More General Theory of Party System Density', American Journal of Political Science, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 921-935. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00469.x

Unpacking LogM : Toward a More General Theory of Party System Density. / Lowery, David; Otjes, Simon; Gherghina, Sergiu; Van Witteloostuijn, Arjen; Peli, Gabor; Brasher, Holly.

In: American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 54, No. 4, 01.10.2010, p. 921-935.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unpacking LogM

T2 - Toward a More General Theory of Party System Density

AU - Lowery, David

AU - Otjes, Simon

AU - Gherghina, Sergiu

AU - Van Witteloostuijn, Arjen

AU - Peli, Gabor

AU - Brasher, Holly

PY - 2010/10/1

Y1 - 2010/10/1

N2 - The standard model of political party system density combines two traditions to explain why some countries have more political parties than others, one tradition that emphasizes social cleavages and another that emphasizes electoral institutions, especially district magnitude. Despite its considerable success, there are several reasons to be less than fully satisfied with the standard model. We examine two of these problems associated with the scope of strategic voting and the functional form of the specification used to test the model. In doing so, we contrast the standard interpretation with an organizational ecology model that accounts for what the standard model did so well, but also accounts for important anomalies it ignores. We reexamine some of the key analyses that have been used to test the standard model to assess the severity of its limitations and the utility of the rival organizational ecology account.

AB - The standard model of political party system density combines two traditions to explain why some countries have more political parties than others, one tradition that emphasizes social cleavages and another that emphasizes electoral institutions, especially district magnitude. Despite its considerable success, there are several reasons to be less than fully satisfied with the standard model. We examine two of these problems associated with the scope of strategic voting and the functional form of the specification used to test the model. In doing so, we contrast the standard interpretation with an organizational ecology model that accounts for what the standard model did so well, but also accounts for important anomalies it ignores. We reexamine some of the key analyses that have been used to test the standard model to assess the severity of its limitations and the utility of the rival organizational ecology account.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651500996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78651500996&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00469.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00469.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78651500996

VL - 54

SP - 921

EP - 935

JO - American Journal of Political Science

JF - American Journal of Political Science

SN - 0092-5853

IS - 4

ER -

Lowery D, Otjes S, Gherghina S, Van Witteloostuijn A, Peli G, Brasher H. Unpacking LogM: Toward a More General Theory of Party System Density. American Journal of Political Science. 2010 Oct 1;54(4):921-935. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00469.x