Upper level of a sustainability assessment framework for power system planning

Sergio Cano-Andrade, Michael R. Von Spakovsky, Alejandro Fuentes, Chiara Lo Prete, Lamine Mili

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper describes the upper level of a two-tiered sustainability assessment framework (SAF) for determining the optimal synthesis/design and operation of a power network and its associated energy production and storage technologies. The upper-level framework is described, and results for its application to a test bed scenario given by the Northwest European electricity power network presented. A brief description of the lower level of the SAF is given as well. In order to analyze the impact of microgrids (MGs) in the main network, two different scenarios are considered in the analysis, i.e., a network without MGs and a network with MGs. The optimization is carried out in a multi-objective, quasi-stationary manner with producer partial-load behavior taken into account via nonlinear functions for efficiency, cost, and emissions that depend on the electricity generated by each nonrenewable or renewable producer technology. Results indicate for the particular problem posed and for the optimal configurations found that including MGs improves the network relative to reductions in capital and operating costs and to increases in network resiliency. On the other hand, total daily SO2 emissions and network exergetic efficiency are not improved for the case when MGs are included.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number041601
JournalJournal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME
Volume137
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Fuel Technology
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Upper level of a sustainability assessment framework for power system planning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this