Use of an integrative soil health test for evaluation of soil management impacts

O. J. Idowu, H. M. Van Es, G. S. Abawi, D. W. Wolfe, R. R. Schindelbeck, B. N. Moebius-Clune, B. K. Gugino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Understanding the response of soil quality indicators to changes in management practices is essential for sustainable land management. Soil quality indicators were measured for 2 years under established experiments with varying management histories and durations at four locations in New York State. The Willsboro (clay loam) and Aurora (silt loam) experiments were established in 1992, comparing no-till (NT) to plow-till (PT) management under corn (Zea mays L.)soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation. The Chazy (silt loam) trial was established in 1973 as a factorial experiment comparing NT versus PT and the crop harvesting method (corn silage versus corn grain). The Geneva (silt loam) experiment was established in 2003 with vegetable rotations with and without intervening soil building crops, each under three tillage methods (NT, PT and zone-till (ZT)) and three cover cropping systems (none, rye and vetch). Physical indicators measured were wet aggregate stability (WAS), available water capacity (AWC) and surface hardness (SH) and subsurface hardness (SSH). Soil biological indicators included organic matter (OM), active carbon (AC), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN) and root disease potential (RDP). Chemical indicators included pH, P, K, Mg, Fe, Mn and Zn. Results from the Willsboro and Aurora sites showed significant tillage effects for several indicators including WAS, AWC, OM, AC, pH, P, K, Mg, Fe and Mn. Generally, the NT treatment had better indicator values than the PT treatments. At the Chazy site, WAS, AWC, OM, AC, pH, K and Mg showed significant differences for tillage and/or harvest method, also with NT showing better indicator values compared to PT and corn grain better than corn silage. Aggregate stability was on average 2.5 times higher in NT compared to PT treatments at Willsboro, Aurora and Chazy sites. OM was also 1.2, 1.1 and 1.5 times higher in NT compared to PT treatments at Willsboro, Aurora and Chazy sites, respectively. At the Geneva site WAS, SH, AC, PMN, pH, P, K and Zn showed significant tillage effects. The cover crop effect was only significant for SH and PMN measurements. Indicators that gave consistent performance across locations included WAS, OM and AC, while PMN and RDP were site and management dependent. The composite soil health index (CSHI) significantly differentiated between contrasting management practices. The CSHI for the Willsboro site was 71% for NT and 59% for PT, while at the Aurora site it was 61% for NT and 48% for PT after 15 years of tillage treatments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)214-224
Number of pages11
JournalRenewable Agriculture and Food Systems
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2009

Fingerprint

plows
soil management
Zea mays
no-tillage
soil quality
Soil
aggregate stability
Hardness
Carbon
Health
Nitrogen
tillage
available water capacity
soil organic matter
Silage
hardness
Practice Management
testing
Soybeans
carbon

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Food Science
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

Idowu, O. J., Van Es, H. M., Abawi, G. S., Wolfe, D. W., Schindelbeck, R. R., Moebius-Clune, B. N., & Gugino, B. K. (2009). Use of an integrative soil health test for evaluation of soil management impacts. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 24(3), 214-224. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170509990068
Idowu, O. J. ; Van Es, H. M. ; Abawi, G. S. ; Wolfe, D. W. ; Schindelbeck, R. R. ; Moebius-Clune, B. N. ; Gugino, B. K. / Use of an integrative soil health test for evaluation of soil management impacts. In: Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2009 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 214-224.
@article{a0f152f1d8e840c697ebf4c8104da202,
title = "Use of an integrative soil health test for evaluation of soil management impacts",
abstract = "Understanding the response of soil quality indicators to changes in management practices is essential for sustainable land management. Soil quality indicators were measured for 2 years under established experiments with varying management histories and durations at four locations in New York State. The Willsboro (clay loam) and Aurora (silt loam) experiments were established in 1992, comparing no-till (NT) to plow-till (PT) management under corn (Zea mays L.)soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation. The Chazy (silt loam) trial was established in 1973 as a factorial experiment comparing NT versus PT and the crop harvesting method (corn silage versus corn grain). The Geneva (silt loam) experiment was established in 2003 with vegetable rotations with and without intervening soil building crops, each under three tillage methods (NT, PT and zone-till (ZT)) and three cover cropping systems (none, rye and vetch). Physical indicators measured were wet aggregate stability (WAS), available water capacity (AWC) and surface hardness (SH) and subsurface hardness (SSH). Soil biological indicators included organic matter (OM), active carbon (AC), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN) and root disease potential (RDP). Chemical indicators included pH, P, K, Mg, Fe, Mn and Zn. Results from the Willsboro and Aurora sites showed significant tillage effects for several indicators including WAS, AWC, OM, AC, pH, P, K, Mg, Fe and Mn. Generally, the NT treatment had better indicator values than the PT treatments. At the Chazy site, WAS, AWC, OM, AC, pH, K and Mg showed significant differences for tillage and/or harvest method, also with NT showing better indicator values compared to PT and corn grain better than corn silage. Aggregate stability was on average 2.5 times higher in NT compared to PT treatments at Willsboro, Aurora and Chazy sites. OM was also 1.2, 1.1 and 1.5 times higher in NT compared to PT treatments at Willsboro, Aurora and Chazy sites, respectively. At the Geneva site WAS, SH, AC, PMN, pH, P, K and Zn showed significant tillage effects. The cover crop effect was only significant for SH and PMN measurements. Indicators that gave consistent performance across locations included WAS, OM and AC, while PMN and RDP were site and management dependent. The composite soil health index (CSHI) significantly differentiated between contrasting management practices. The CSHI for the Willsboro site was 71{\%} for NT and 59{\%} for PT, while at the Aurora site it was 61{\%} for NT and 48{\%} for PT after 15 years of tillage treatments.",
author = "Idowu, {O. J.} and {Van Es}, {H. M.} and Abawi, {G. S.} and Wolfe, {D. W.} and Schindelbeck, {R. R.} and Moebius-Clune, {B. N.} and Gugino, {B. K.}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1742170509990068",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "214--224",
journal = "Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems",
issn = "1742-1705",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

Idowu, OJ, Van Es, HM, Abawi, GS, Wolfe, DW, Schindelbeck, RR, Moebius-Clune, BN & Gugino, BK 2009, 'Use of an integrative soil health test for evaluation of soil management impacts', Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 214-224. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170509990068

Use of an integrative soil health test for evaluation of soil management impacts. / Idowu, O. J.; Van Es, H. M.; Abawi, G. S.; Wolfe, D. W.; Schindelbeck, R. R.; Moebius-Clune, B. N.; Gugino, B. K.

In: Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.09.2009, p. 214-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of an integrative soil health test for evaluation of soil management impacts

AU - Idowu, O. J.

AU - Van Es, H. M.

AU - Abawi, G. S.

AU - Wolfe, D. W.

AU - Schindelbeck, R. R.

AU - Moebius-Clune, B. N.

AU - Gugino, B. K.

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - Understanding the response of soil quality indicators to changes in management practices is essential for sustainable land management. Soil quality indicators were measured for 2 years under established experiments with varying management histories and durations at four locations in New York State. The Willsboro (clay loam) and Aurora (silt loam) experiments were established in 1992, comparing no-till (NT) to plow-till (PT) management under corn (Zea mays L.)soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation. The Chazy (silt loam) trial was established in 1973 as a factorial experiment comparing NT versus PT and the crop harvesting method (corn silage versus corn grain). The Geneva (silt loam) experiment was established in 2003 with vegetable rotations with and without intervening soil building crops, each under three tillage methods (NT, PT and zone-till (ZT)) and three cover cropping systems (none, rye and vetch). Physical indicators measured were wet aggregate stability (WAS), available water capacity (AWC) and surface hardness (SH) and subsurface hardness (SSH). Soil biological indicators included organic matter (OM), active carbon (AC), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN) and root disease potential (RDP). Chemical indicators included pH, P, K, Mg, Fe, Mn and Zn. Results from the Willsboro and Aurora sites showed significant tillage effects for several indicators including WAS, AWC, OM, AC, pH, P, K, Mg, Fe and Mn. Generally, the NT treatment had better indicator values than the PT treatments. At the Chazy site, WAS, AWC, OM, AC, pH, K and Mg showed significant differences for tillage and/or harvest method, also with NT showing better indicator values compared to PT and corn grain better than corn silage. Aggregate stability was on average 2.5 times higher in NT compared to PT treatments at Willsboro, Aurora and Chazy sites. OM was also 1.2, 1.1 and 1.5 times higher in NT compared to PT treatments at Willsboro, Aurora and Chazy sites, respectively. At the Geneva site WAS, SH, AC, PMN, pH, P, K and Zn showed significant tillage effects. The cover crop effect was only significant for SH and PMN measurements. Indicators that gave consistent performance across locations included WAS, OM and AC, while PMN and RDP were site and management dependent. The composite soil health index (CSHI) significantly differentiated between contrasting management practices. The CSHI for the Willsboro site was 71% for NT and 59% for PT, while at the Aurora site it was 61% for NT and 48% for PT after 15 years of tillage treatments.

AB - Understanding the response of soil quality indicators to changes in management practices is essential for sustainable land management. Soil quality indicators were measured for 2 years under established experiments with varying management histories and durations at four locations in New York State. The Willsboro (clay loam) and Aurora (silt loam) experiments were established in 1992, comparing no-till (NT) to plow-till (PT) management under corn (Zea mays L.)soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation. The Chazy (silt loam) trial was established in 1973 as a factorial experiment comparing NT versus PT and the crop harvesting method (corn silage versus corn grain). The Geneva (silt loam) experiment was established in 2003 with vegetable rotations with and without intervening soil building crops, each under three tillage methods (NT, PT and zone-till (ZT)) and three cover cropping systems (none, rye and vetch). Physical indicators measured were wet aggregate stability (WAS), available water capacity (AWC) and surface hardness (SH) and subsurface hardness (SSH). Soil biological indicators included organic matter (OM), active carbon (AC), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN) and root disease potential (RDP). Chemical indicators included pH, P, K, Mg, Fe, Mn and Zn. Results from the Willsboro and Aurora sites showed significant tillage effects for several indicators including WAS, AWC, OM, AC, pH, P, K, Mg, Fe and Mn. Generally, the NT treatment had better indicator values than the PT treatments. At the Chazy site, WAS, AWC, OM, AC, pH, K and Mg showed significant differences for tillage and/or harvest method, also with NT showing better indicator values compared to PT and corn grain better than corn silage. Aggregate stability was on average 2.5 times higher in NT compared to PT treatments at Willsboro, Aurora and Chazy sites. OM was also 1.2, 1.1 and 1.5 times higher in NT compared to PT treatments at Willsboro, Aurora and Chazy sites, respectively. At the Geneva site WAS, SH, AC, PMN, pH, P, K and Zn showed significant tillage effects. The cover crop effect was only significant for SH and PMN measurements. Indicators that gave consistent performance across locations included WAS, OM and AC, while PMN and RDP were site and management dependent. The composite soil health index (CSHI) significantly differentiated between contrasting management practices. The CSHI for the Willsboro site was 71% for NT and 59% for PT, while at the Aurora site it was 61% for NT and 48% for PT after 15 years of tillage treatments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71749084028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71749084028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1742170509990068

DO - 10.1017/S1742170509990068

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:71749084028

VL - 24

SP - 214

EP - 224

JO - Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

JF - Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

SN - 1742-1705

IS - 3

ER -

Idowu OJ, Van Es HM, Abawi GS, Wolfe DW, Schindelbeck RR, Moebius-Clune BN et al. Use of an integrative soil health test for evaluation of soil management impacts. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2009 Sep 1;24(3):214-224. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170509990068