Use of avian and mammalian guilds as indicators of cumulative impacts in riparian-wetland areas

Mary Jo Croonquist, Robert P. Brooks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A new method of assessing cumulative effects of human activities on bird and mammal communities of riparian-wetland areas was developed by using response guilds to reflect how species theoretically respond to habitat disturbance on a landscape level. All bird and mammal species of Pennsylvania were assigned values for each response guild using documented information for each species, to reflect their sensitivity to disturbances; high guild scores corresponded to low tolerance toward habitat disturbance. We hypothesized that, given limited time and resources, determining how wildife communities change in response to environmental impacts can be done more efficiently with a response-guild approach than a single-species approach. To test the model, censuses of birds and mammals were conducted along wetland and riparian areas of a protected and a disturbed watershed in central Pennsylvania. The percent of bird species with high response-guild scores (i.e., species that had specific habitat requirements and/or were neotropical migrants) remained relatively stable through the protected watershed. As intensity of habitat alteration increased through the disturbed watershed, percentage of bird species with high response-guild scores decreased. Only 2%-3% of the neotropical migrants that had specific habitat requirements were breeding residents in disturbed habitats as compared to 17%-20% in reference areas. Species in the edge and exotic guild classifications (low guild scores) were found in greater percentages in the disturbed watershed. Composition of mammalian guilds showed no consistent pattern associated with habitat disturbance. Avian response guilds reflected habitat disturbance more predictively than mammalian response guilds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)701-714
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 1991

Fingerprint

Birds
Wetlands
guild
Watersheds
wetland
Mammals
habitat
disturbance
watershed
mammal
bird
Environmental impact
indicator
Chemical analysis
census
environmental impact
human activity
tolerance
breeding

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology
  • Pollution

Cite this

Croonquist, Mary Jo ; Brooks, Robert P. / Use of avian and mammalian guilds as indicators of cumulative impacts in riparian-wetland areas. In: Environmental Management. 1991 ; Vol. 15, No. 5. pp. 701-714.
@article{626193541c604fea856133eaf330cd96,
title = "Use of avian and mammalian guilds as indicators of cumulative impacts in riparian-wetland areas",
abstract = "A new method of assessing cumulative effects of human activities on bird and mammal communities of riparian-wetland areas was developed by using response guilds to reflect how species theoretically respond to habitat disturbance on a landscape level. All bird and mammal species of Pennsylvania were assigned values for each response guild using documented information for each species, to reflect their sensitivity to disturbances; high guild scores corresponded to low tolerance toward habitat disturbance. We hypothesized that, given limited time and resources, determining how wildife communities change in response to environmental impacts can be done more efficiently with a response-guild approach than a single-species approach. To test the model, censuses of birds and mammals were conducted along wetland and riparian areas of a protected and a disturbed watershed in central Pennsylvania. The percent of bird species with high response-guild scores (i.e., species that had specific habitat requirements and/or were neotropical migrants) remained relatively stable through the protected watershed. As intensity of habitat alteration increased through the disturbed watershed, percentage of bird species with high response-guild scores decreased. Only 2{\%}-3{\%} of the neotropical migrants that had specific habitat requirements were breeding residents in disturbed habitats as compared to 17{\%}-20{\%} in reference areas. Species in the edge and exotic guild classifications (low guild scores) were found in greater percentages in the disturbed watershed. Composition of mammalian guilds showed no consistent pattern associated with habitat disturbance. Avian response guilds reflected habitat disturbance more predictively than mammalian response guilds.",
author = "Croonquist, {Mary Jo} and Brooks, {Robert P.}",
year = "1991",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF02589628",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "701--714",
journal = "Environmental Management",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

Use of avian and mammalian guilds as indicators of cumulative impacts in riparian-wetland areas. / Croonquist, Mary Jo; Brooks, Robert P.

In: Environmental Management, Vol. 15, No. 5, 01.09.1991, p. 701-714.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of avian and mammalian guilds as indicators of cumulative impacts in riparian-wetland areas

AU - Croonquist, Mary Jo

AU - Brooks, Robert P.

PY - 1991/9/1

Y1 - 1991/9/1

N2 - A new method of assessing cumulative effects of human activities on bird and mammal communities of riparian-wetland areas was developed by using response guilds to reflect how species theoretically respond to habitat disturbance on a landscape level. All bird and mammal species of Pennsylvania were assigned values for each response guild using documented information for each species, to reflect their sensitivity to disturbances; high guild scores corresponded to low tolerance toward habitat disturbance. We hypothesized that, given limited time and resources, determining how wildife communities change in response to environmental impacts can be done more efficiently with a response-guild approach than a single-species approach. To test the model, censuses of birds and mammals were conducted along wetland and riparian areas of a protected and a disturbed watershed in central Pennsylvania. The percent of bird species with high response-guild scores (i.e., species that had specific habitat requirements and/or were neotropical migrants) remained relatively stable through the protected watershed. As intensity of habitat alteration increased through the disturbed watershed, percentage of bird species with high response-guild scores decreased. Only 2%-3% of the neotropical migrants that had specific habitat requirements were breeding residents in disturbed habitats as compared to 17%-20% in reference areas. Species in the edge and exotic guild classifications (low guild scores) were found in greater percentages in the disturbed watershed. Composition of mammalian guilds showed no consistent pattern associated with habitat disturbance. Avian response guilds reflected habitat disturbance more predictively than mammalian response guilds.

AB - A new method of assessing cumulative effects of human activities on bird and mammal communities of riparian-wetland areas was developed by using response guilds to reflect how species theoretically respond to habitat disturbance on a landscape level. All bird and mammal species of Pennsylvania were assigned values for each response guild using documented information for each species, to reflect their sensitivity to disturbances; high guild scores corresponded to low tolerance toward habitat disturbance. We hypothesized that, given limited time and resources, determining how wildife communities change in response to environmental impacts can be done more efficiently with a response-guild approach than a single-species approach. To test the model, censuses of birds and mammals were conducted along wetland and riparian areas of a protected and a disturbed watershed in central Pennsylvania. The percent of bird species with high response-guild scores (i.e., species that had specific habitat requirements and/or were neotropical migrants) remained relatively stable through the protected watershed. As intensity of habitat alteration increased through the disturbed watershed, percentage of bird species with high response-guild scores decreased. Only 2%-3% of the neotropical migrants that had specific habitat requirements were breeding residents in disturbed habitats as compared to 17%-20% in reference areas. Species in the edge and exotic guild classifications (low guild scores) were found in greater percentages in the disturbed watershed. Composition of mammalian guilds showed no consistent pattern associated with habitat disturbance. Avian response guilds reflected habitat disturbance more predictively than mammalian response guilds.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026408061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026408061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02589628

DO - 10.1007/BF02589628

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026408061

VL - 15

SP - 701

EP - 714

JO - Environmental Management

JF - Environmental Management

SN - 0364-152X

IS - 5

ER -