Use of Bayley Scales in Individuals with Profound Mental Retardation: Comparison of the First and Second Editions

Mary Beth DeWitt, Kimberly Anne Schreck, James A. Mulick

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessment of individuals with profound mental retardation is complicated by the limited number of instruments available. Our experience has been to use the Bayley Scales of Infant Development to obtain an estimate of developmental level. When comparing the first and second editions, we have found a decline in functioning for residents in instances where there has been no medical or neurological reason to account for such decline. Our results show that raw scores and age equivalents are lower with administration of the second edition of the scale. Clinicians should report a range of scores and functioning, rather than following a strict basal and ceiling rule for administration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)307-313
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Child Development
Intellectual Disability

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{57ef6175b8914dfd8b13d5ebc36d851d,
title = "Use of Bayley Scales in Individuals with Profound Mental Retardation: Comparison of the First and Second Editions",
abstract = "Assessment of individuals with profound mental retardation is complicated by the limited number of instruments available. Our experience has been to use the Bayley Scales of Infant Development to obtain an estimate of developmental level. When comparing the first and second editions, we have found a decline in functioning for residents in instances where there has been no medical or neurological reason to account for such decline. Our results show that raw scores and age equivalents are lower with administration of the second edition of the scale. Clinicians should report a range of scores and functioning, rather than following a strict basal and ceiling rule for administration.",
author = "DeWitt, {Mary Beth} and Schreck, {Kimberly Anne} and Mulick, {James A.}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1022824225502",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "307--313",
journal = "Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities",
issn = "1056-263X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

Use of Bayley Scales in Individuals with Profound Mental Retardation : Comparison of the First and Second Editions. / DeWitt, Mary Beth; Schreck, Kimberly Anne; Mulick, James A.

In: Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.01.1998, p. 307-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of Bayley Scales in Individuals with Profound Mental Retardation

T2 - Comparison of the First and Second Editions

AU - DeWitt, Mary Beth

AU - Schreck, Kimberly Anne

AU - Mulick, James A.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Assessment of individuals with profound mental retardation is complicated by the limited number of instruments available. Our experience has been to use the Bayley Scales of Infant Development to obtain an estimate of developmental level. When comparing the first and second editions, we have found a decline in functioning for residents in instances where there has been no medical or neurological reason to account for such decline. Our results show that raw scores and age equivalents are lower with administration of the second edition of the scale. Clinicians should report a range of scores and functioning, rather than following a strict basal and ceiling rule for administration.

AB - Assessment of individuals with profound mental retardation is complicated by the limited number of instruments available. Our experience has been to use the Bayley Scales of Infant Development to obtain an estimate of developmental level. When comparing the first and second editions, we have found a decline in functioning for residents in instances where there has been no medical or neurological reason to account for such decline. Our results show that raw scores and age equivalents are lower with administration of the second edition of the scale. Clinicians should report a range of scores and functioning, rather than following a strict basal and ceiling rule for administration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032362520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032362520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1022824225502

DO - 10.1023/A:1022824225502

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0032362520

VL - 10

SP - 307

EP - 313

JO - Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities

JF - Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities

SN - 1056-263X

IS - 3

ER -