Use of kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

531 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of kriging models for approximation and metamodel-based design and optimization has been steadily on the rise in the past decade. The widespread use of kriging models appears to be hampered by 1) computationally efficient algorithms for accurately estimating the model's parameters, 2) an effective method to assess the resulting model's quality, and 3) the lack of guidance in selecting the appropriate form of the kriging model. We attempt to address these issues by comparing 1) maximum likelihood estimation and cross validation parameter estimation methods for selecting a kriging model's parameters given its form and 2) an R2 of prediction and the corrected Akaike information criterion assessment methods for quantifying the quality of the created kriging model. These methods are demonstrated with six test problems. Finally, different forms of kriging models are examined to determine if more complex forms are more accurate and easier to fit than simple forms of kriging models for approximating computer models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)853-863
Number of pages11
JournalAIAA journal
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005

Fingerprint

Maximum likelihood estimation
Parameter estimation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Aerospace Engineering

Cite this

@article{e3df9386a2074cc9abc4ef5f5bf6946c,
title = "Use of kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models",
abstract = "The use of kriging models for approximation and metamodel-based design and optimization has been steadily on the rise in the past decade. The widespread use of kriging models appears to be hampered by 1) computationally efficient algorithms for accurately estimating the model's parameters, 2) an effective method to assess the resulting model's quality, and 3) the lack of guidance in selecting the appropriate form of the kriging model. We attempt to address these issues by comparing 1) maximum likelihood estimation and cross validation parameter estimation methods for selecting a kriging model's parameters given its form and 2) an R2 of prediction and the corrected Akaike information criterion assessment methods for quantifying the quality of the created kriging model. These methods are demonstrated with six test problems. Finally, different forms of kriging models are examined to determine if more complex forms are more accurate and easier to fit than simple forms of kriging models for approximating computer models.",
author = "Martin, {Jay D.} and Simpson, {Timothy W.}",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.2514/1.8650",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "853--863",
journal = "AIAA Journal",
issn = "0001-1452",
publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA)",
number = "4",

}

Use of kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models. / Martin, Jay D.; Simpson, Timothy W.

In: AIAA journal, Vol. 43, No. 4, 04.2005, p. 853-863.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models

AU - Martin, Jay D.

AU - Simpson, Timothy W.

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - The use of kriging models for approximation and metamodel-based design and optimization has been steadily on the rise in the past decade. The widespread use of kriging models appears to be hampered by 1) computationally efficient algorithms for accurately estimating the model's parameters, 2) an effective method to assess the resulting model's quality, and 3) the lack of guidance in selecting the appropriate form of the kriging model. We attempt to address these issues by comparing 1) maximum likelihood estimation and cross validation parameter estimation methods for selecting a kriging model's parameters given its form and 2) an R2 of prediction and the corrected Akaike information criterion assessment methods for quantifying the quality of the created kriging model. These methods are demonstrated with six test problems. Finally, different forms of kriging models are examined to determine if more complex forms are more accurate and easier to fit than simple forms of kriging models for approximating computer models.

AB - The use of kriging models for approximation and metamodel-based design and optimization has been steadily on the rise in the past decade. The widespread use of kriging models appears to be hampered by 1) computationally efficient algorithms for accurately estimating the model's parameters, 2) an effective method to assess the resulting model's quality, and 3) the lack of guidance in selecting the appropriate form of the kriging model. We attempt to address these issues by comparing 1) maximum likelihood estimation and cross validation parameter estimation methods for selecting a kriging model's parameters given its form and 2) an R2 of prediction and the corrected Akaike information criterion assessment methods for quantifying the quality of the created kriging model. These methods are demonstrated with six test problems. Finally, different forms of kriging models are examined to determine if more complex forms are more accurate and easier to fit than simple forms of kriging models for approximating computer models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17444414416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17444414416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2514/1.8650

DO - 10.2514/1.8650

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:17444414416

VL - 43

SP - 853

EP - 863

JO - AIAA Journal

JF - AIAA Journal

SN - 0001-1452

IS - 4

ER -