Use of noise correlation matrices to interpret ocean ambient noise

Stephen M. Nichols, David Bradley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Oceanic ambient noise is a dynamic mixture of biologic, geophysical, and anthropogenic sound sources. A goal of research is to put some order in this cacophony of information, understand the received spectral content and determine the primary contributors to the ambient noise. This paper compares three methods to assist in that process (with emphasis on noise correlation techniques): noise correlation matrices, manual selection of noise spectra, and principal component analysis. Comparison followed a common process: selection of a replica set (best termed a characteristic subset of noise spectra), which are used to recreate the original noise field for comparison and consequent decision as to whether that replica set represented the noise measurements adequately. Conclusions of this study are (1) noise correlation matrices provide the best definition of the spectra that represent a particular source and offer potential in organizing and identifying specific noise source content. (2) Manual sorting of noise spectra, while able to identify specific events easily, is both labor intensive, given the quantity of data available; and suffers from incorrect interpretation of multiple competing sound sources, when present. (3) Principal component analysis provides the best reconstruction of measured noise, but has difficulty linking components to physical source mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2337-2349
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume145
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

oceans
noise spectra
principal components analysis
replicas
acoustics
Ocean
labor
organizing
noise measurement
classifying
set theory
Principal Component Analysis
Sound

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

@article{a15016f380d74fca8fd4b6bc88cc4a37,
title = "Use of noise correlation matrices to interpret ocean ambient noise",
abstract = "Oceanic ambient noise is a dynamic mixture of biologic, geophysical, and anthropogenic sound sources. A goal of research is to put some order in this cacophony of information, understand the received spectral content and determine the primary contributors to the ambient noise. This paper compares three methods to assist in that process (with emphasis on noise correlation techniques): noise correlation matrices, manual selection of noise spectra, and principal component analysis. Comparison followed a common process: selection of a replica set (best termed a characteristic subset of noise spectra), which are used to recreate the original noise field for comparison and consequent decision as to whether that replica set represented the noise measurements adequately. Conclusions of this study are (1) noise correlation matrices provide the best definition of the spectra that represent a particular source and offer potential in organizing and identifying specific noise source content. (2) Manual sorting of noise spectra, while able to identify specific events easily, is both labor intensive, given the quantity of data available; and suffers from incorrect interpretation of multiple competing sound sources, when present. (3) Principal component analysis provides the best reconstruction of measured noise, but has difficulty linking components to physical source mechanisms.",
author = "Nichols, {Stephen M.} and David Bradley",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.5096846",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "145",
pages = "2337--2349",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "4",

}

Use of noise correlation matrices to interpret ocean ambient noise. / Nichols, Stephen M.; Bradley, David.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 145, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 2337-2349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of noise correlation matrices to interpret ocean ambient noise

AU - Nichols, Stephen M.

AU - Bradley, David

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Oceanic ambient noise is a dynamic mixture of biologic, geophysical, and anthropogenic sound sources. A goal of research is to put some order in this cacophony of information, understand the received spectral content and determine the primary contributors to the ambient noise. This paper compares three methods to assist in that process (with emphasis on noise correlation techniques): noise correlation matrices, manual selection of noise spectra, and principal component analysis. Comparison followed a common process: selection of a replica set (best termed a characteristic subset of noise spectra), which are used to recreate the original noise field for comparison and consequent decision as to whether that replica set represented the noise measurements adequately. Conclusions of this study are (1) noise correlation matrices provide the best definition of the spectra that represent a particular source and offer potential in organizing and identifying specific noise source content. (2) Manual sorting of noise spectra, while able to identify specific events easily, is both labor intensive, given the quantity of data available; and suffers from incorrect interpretation of multiple competing sound sources, when present. (3) Principal component analysis provides the best reconstruction of measured noise, but has difficulty linking components to physical source mechanisms.

AB - Oceanic ambient noise is a dynamic mixture of biologic, geophysical, and anthropogenic sound sources. A goal of research is to put some order in this cacophony of information, understand the received spectral content and determine the primary contributors to the ambient noise. This paper compares three methods to assist in that process (with emphasis on noise correlation techniques): noise correlation matrices, manual selection of noise spectra, and principal component analysis. Comparison followed a common process: selection of a replica set (best termed a characteristic subset of noise spectra), which are used to recreate the original noise field for comparison and consequent decision as to whether that replica set represented the noise measurements adequately. Conclusions of this study are (1) noise correlation matrices provide the best definition of the spectra that represent a particular source and offer potential in organizing and identifying specific noise source content. (2) Manual sorting of noise spectra, while able to identify specific events easily, is both labor intensive, given the quantity of data available; and suffers from incorrect interpretation of multiple competing sound sources, when present. (3) Principal component analysis provides the best reconstruction of measured noise, but has difficulty linking components to physical source mechanisms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065127509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065127509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.5096846

DO - 10.1121/1.5096846

M3 - Article

VL - 145

SP - 2337

EP - 2349

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 4

ER -