Using a Soil Hydrology Model to obtain regionally averaged soil moisture values

Todd M. Crawford, David Jonathan Stensrud, Toby N. Carlson, William J. Capehart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Soil Hydrology Model (SHM) was modified, and daily simulations of soil volumetric water content were made at 38 Oklahoma Mesonet sites for July 1997. These model results were compared with soil moisture observations made at the mesonet sites at depths of 5, 25, 60, and 75 cm. This work is believed to be the first time that a hydrological model has been evaluated with in situ soil moisture measurements over such an extensive area spanning several climate zones. Comparisons of time series between the observed and modeled domain-averaged volumetric water content at 5 cm revealed similar phase and amplitude changes, a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.64, and small mean bias and root-mean-square errors (MBE and rmse) of 0.03 and 0.09, respectively. At 25, 60, and 75 cm, the model performance was slightly worse, with R2 values between 0.27 and 0.40, MBE between -0.01 and 0.02, and rmse between 0.11 and 0.13. The model response to changes in soil water at these levels was sluggish, possibly because of, among other things, a lack of ability to model preferential downward water flow through cracks in the soil. The results of this study suggest that SHM can be used effectively to initialize 5-cm soil moisture values in numerical prediction models. At deeper soil levels, however, the relatively small R2 values and negligible MBE suggest that the model may be better suited for initializing a regionally averaged soil moisture value rather than unique gridbox values. These results illustrate the difficulty in using point measurements to validate a hydrological model, especially deeper in the soil where moisture values are more dependent on soil properties (which can vary sharply over small distances) and are less dependent on recent rainfall.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)353-363
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Hydrometeorology
Volume1
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

hydrology
soil moisture
soil
soil water
water content
preferential flow
water flow
soil property
crack
time series
rainfall
climate
prediction
simulation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Crawford, Todd M. ; Stensrud, David Jonathan ; Carlson, Toby N. ; Capehart, William J. / Using a Soil Hydrology Model to obtain regionally averaged soil moisture values. In: Journal of Hydrometeorology. 2000 ; Vol. 1, No. 4. pp. 353-363.
@article{7d9f7c0c515e44c092d9a274fc9737a0,
title = "Using a Soil Hydrology Model to obtain regionally averaged soil moisture values",
abstract = "The Soil Hydrology Model (SHM) was modified, and daily simulations of soil volumetric water content were made at 38 Oklahoma Mesonet sites for July 1997. These model results were compared with soil moisture observations made at the mesonet sites at depths of 5, 25, 60, and 75 cm. This work is believed to be the first time that a hydrological model has been evaluated with in situ soil moisture measurements over such an extensive area spanning several climate zones. Comparisons of time series between the observed and modeled domain-averaged volumetric water content at 5 cm revealed similar phase and amplitude changes, a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.64, and small mean bias and root-mean-square errors (MBE and rmse) of 0.03 and 0.09, respectively. At 25, 60, and 75 cm, the model performance was slightly worse, with R2 values between 0.27 and 0.40, MBE between -0.01 and 0.02, and rmse between 0.11 and 0.13. The model response to changes in soil water at these levels was sluggish, possibly because of, among other things, a lack of ability to model preferential downward water flow through cracks in the soil. The results of this study suggest that SHM can be used effectively to initialize 5-cm soil moisture values in numerical prediction models. At deeper soil levels, however, the relatively small R2 values and negligible MBE suggest that the model may be better suited for initializing a regionally averaged soil moisture value rather than unique gridbox values. These results illustrate the difficulty in using point measurements to validate a hydrological model, especially deeper in the soil where moisture values are more dependent on soil properties (which can vary sharply over small distances) and are less dependent on recent rainfall.",
author = "Crawford, {Todd M.} and Stensrud, {David Jonathan} and Carlson, {Toby N.} and Capehart, {William J.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/1525-7541(2000)001<0353:UASHMT>2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "353--363",
journal = "Journal of Hydrometeorology",
issn = "1525-755X",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "4",

}

Using a Soil Hydrology Model to obtain regionally averaged soil moisture values. / Crawford, Todd M.; Stensrud, David Jonathan; Carlson, Toby N.; Capehart, William J.

In: Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 1, No. 4, 01.01.2000, p. 353-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using a Soil Hydrology Model to obtain regionally averaged soil moisture values

AU - Crawford, Todd M.

AU - Stensrud, David Jonathan

AU - Carlson, Toby N.

AU - Capehart, William J.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - The Soil Hydrology Model (SHM) was modified, and daily simulations of soil volumetric water content were made at 38 Oklahoma Mesonet sites for July 1997. These model results were compared with soil moisture observations made at the mesonet sites at depths of 5, 25, 60, and 75 cm. This work is believed to be the first time that a hydrological model has been evaluated with in situ soil moisture measurements over such an extensive area spanning several climate zones. Comparisons of time series between the observed and modeled domain-averaged volumetric water content at 5 cm revealed similar phase and amplitude changes, a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.64, and small mean bias and root-mean-square errors (MBE and rmse) of 0.03 and 0.09, respectively. At 25, 60, and 75 cm, the model performance was slightly worse, with R2 values between 0.27 and 0.40, MBE between -0.01 and 0.02, and rmse between 0.11 and 0.13. The model response to changes in soil water at these levels was sluggish, possibly because of, among other things, a lack of ability to model preferential downward water flow through cracks in the soil. The results of this study suggest that SHM can be used effectively to initialize 5-cm soil moisture values in numerical prediction models. At deeper soil levels, however, the relatively small R2 values and negligible MBE suggest that the model may be better suited for initializing a regionally averaged soil moisture value rather than unique gridbox values. These results illustrate the difficulty in using point measurements to validate a hydrological model, especially deeper in the soil where moisture values are more dependent on soil properties (which can vary sharply over small distances) and are less dependent on recent rainfall.

AB - The Soil Hydrology Model (SHM) was modified, and daily simulations of soil volumetric water content were made at 38 Oklahoma Mesonet sites for July 1997. These model results were compared with soil moisture observations made at the mesonet sites at depths of 5, 25, 60, and 75 cm. This work is believed to be the first time that a hydrological model has been evaluated with in situ soil moisture measurements over such an extensive area spanning several climate zones. Comparisons of time series between the observed and modeled domain-averaged volumetric water content at 5 cm revealed similar phase and amplitude changes, a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.64, and small mean bias and root-mean-square errors (MBE and rmse) of 0.03 and 0.09, respectively. At 25, 60, and 75 cm, the model performance was slightly worse, with R2 values between 0.27 and 0.40, MBE between -0.01 and 0.02, and rmse between 0.11 and 0.13. The model response to changes in soil water at these levels was sluggish, possibly because of, among other things, a lack of ability to model preferential downward water flow through cracks in the soil. The results of this study suggest that SHM can be used effectively to initialize 5-cm soil moisture values in numerical prediction models. At deeper soil levels, however, the relatively small R2 values and negligible MBE suggest that the model may be better suited for initializing a regionally averaged soil moisture value rather than unique gridbox values. These results illustrate the difficulty in using point measurements to validate a hydrological model, especially deeper in the soil where moisture values are more dependent on soil properties (which can vary sharply over small distances) and are less dependent on recent rainfall.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034349599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034349599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/1525-7541(2000)001<0353:UASHMT>2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1175/1525-7541(2000)001<0353:UASHMT>2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 353

EP - 363

JO - Journal of Hydrometeorology

JF - Journal of Hydrometeorology

SN - 1525-755X

IS - 4

ER -