Using Experiential Learning to Increase the Recognition of Everyday Sexism as Harmful: The WAGES Intervention

Jessica L. Cundiff, Matthew J. Zawadzki, Cinnamon L. Danube, Stephanie A. Shields

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The harms of subtle sexism tend to be minimized despite negative cumulative effects, thus people may be less motivated to address subtle sexism. We tested the effectiveness of an experiential learning intervention, WAGES-Academic (Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation-Academic), to educate about the harms of subtle sexism in the academic workplace. Across two studies, WAGES increased the recognition of everyday sexism as harmful and promoted behavioral intentions to discuss and seek information about gender inequity compared to a control condition that provided identical information as WAGES but without experiential learning. These effects were due to WAGES limiting reactance and promoting self-efficacy. Moreover, WAGES did not differ in reactance or self-efficacy compared to a control condition that provided no gender inequity information. This suggests that WAGES buffers the potential negative effects of simply presenting gender inequity information. Results suggest that WAGES, and experiential learning more broadly, has the potential to change attitudes and behaviors about everyday sexism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)703-721
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Social Issues
Volume70
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

sexism
reactance
learning
gender
self-efficacy
attitude change
equity
workplace
simulation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Cundiff, Jessica L. ; Zawadzki, Matthew J. ; Danube, Cinnamon L. ; Shields, Stephanie A. / Using Experiential Learning to Increase the Recognition of Everyday Sexism as Harmful : The WAGES Intervention. In: Journal of Social Issues. 2014 ; Vol. 70, No. 4. pp. 703-721.
@article{d4ed3f4cd50c49b0863422499fc7e607,
title = "Using Experiential Learning to Increase the Recognition of Everyday Sexism as Harmful: The WAGES Intervention",
abstract = "The harms of subtle sexism tend to be minimized despite negative cumulative effects, thus people may be less motivated to address subtle sexism. We tested the effectiveness of an experiential learning intervention, WAGES-Academic (Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation-Academic), to educate about the harms of subtle sexism in the academic workplace. Across two studies, WAGES increased the recognition of everyday sexism as harmful and promoted behavioral intentions to discuss and seek information about gender inequity compared to a control condition that provided identical information as WAGES but without experiential learning. These effects were due to WAGES limiting reactance and promoting self-efficacy. Moreover, WAGES did not differ in reactance or self-efficacy compared to a control condition that provided no gender inequity information. This suggests that WAGES buffers the potential negative effects of simply presenting gender inequity information. Results suggest that WAGES, and experiential learning more broadly, has the potential to change attitudes and behaviors about everyday sexism.",
author = "Cundiff, {Jessica L.} and Zawadzki, {Matthew J.} and Danube, {Cinnamon L.} and Shields, {Stephanie A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/josi.12087",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "703--721",
journal = "Journal of Social Issues",
issn = "0022-4537",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Using Experiential Learning to Increase the Recognition of Everyday Sexism as Harmful : The WAGES Intervention. / Cundiff, Jessica L.; Zawadzki, Matthew J.; Danube, Cinnamon L.; Shields, Stephanie A.

In: Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 70, No. 4, 01.12.2014, p. 703-721.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using Experiential Learning to Increase the Recognition of Everyday Sexism as Harmful

T2 - The WAGES Intervention

AU - Cundiff, Jessica L.

AU - Zawadzki, Matthew J.

AU - Danube, Cinnamon L.

AU - Shields, Stephanie A.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - The harms of subtle sexism tend to be minimized despite negative cumulative effects, thus people may be less motivated to address subtle sexism. We tested the effectiveness of an experiential learning intervention, WAGES-Academic (Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation-Academic), to educate about the harms of subtle sexism in the academic workplace. Across two studies, WAGES increased the recognition of everyday sexism as harmful and promoted behavioral intentions to discuss and seek information about gender inequity compared to a control condition that provided identical information as WAGES but without experiential learning. These effects were due to WAGES limiting reactance and promoting self-efficacy. Moreover, WAGES did not differ in reactance or self-efficacy compared to a control condition that provided no gender inequity information. This suggests that WAGES buffers the potential negative effects of simply presenting gender inequity information. Results suggest that WAGES, and experiential learning more broadly, has the potential to change attitudes and behaviors about everyday sexism.

AB - The harms of subtle sexism tend to be minimized despite negative cumulative effects, thus people may be less motivated to address subtle sexism. We tested the effectiveness of an experiential learning intervention, WAGES-Academic (Workshop Activity for Gender Equity Simulation-Academic), to educate about the harms of subtle sexism in the academic workplace. Across two studies, WAGES increased the recognition of everyday sexism as harmful and promoted behavioral intentions to discuss and seek information about gender inequity compared to a control condition that provided identical information as WAGES but without experiential learning. These effects were due to WAGES limiting reactance and promoting self-efficacy. Moreover, WAGES did not differ in reactance or self-efficacy compared to a control condition that provided no gender inequity information. This suggests that WAGES buffers the potential negative effects of simply presenting gender inequity information. Results suggest that WAGES, and experiential learning more broadly, has the potential to change attitudes and behaviors about everyday sexism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84914810750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84914810750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/josi.12087

DO - 10.1111/josi.12087

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84914810750

VL - 70

SP - 703

EP - 721

JO - Journal of Social Issues

JF - Journal of Social Issues

SN - 0022-4537

IS - 4

ER -