Using multiple coding schemes for classification and coding of agricultural injury

Dennis James Murphy, Serap Gorucu, Bryan Weichelt, Erika Scott, Mark Purschwitz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Agricultural safety and health researchers have used a variety of classification and coding schemes to identify and categorize injury, illness, and disease associated with agricultural hazards. This paper demonstrates how the Farm and Agricultural Injury Classification (FAIC) and Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System (OIICS) coding schemes can be used in tandem for all agricultural injuries. Methods: Specific cases from the AgInjuryNews.org database were selected to illustrate how the FAIC and OIICS codes can be applied to agricultural injury, and to illustrate limitations that still exist with each coding scheme. Results: Using the FAIC and OIICS together provided a clearer picture of an injury incident by combining more explicit occupational and non-occupational exposures with incident type details in a single table. Conclusions: Both FAIC and OIICS coding schemes depend on sufficient information being available from injury reports. This paper concluded with suggestions for improving coding of agricultural injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-98
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine
Volume62
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Using multiple coding schemes for classification and coding of agricultural injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this