Using risk assessment to inform sentencing decisions for nonviolent offenders in Virginia

Matthew Kleiman, Brian J. Ostrom, Fred L. Cheesman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Virginia has abolished parole and adopted truth-in-sentencing guidelines for persons convicted of felonies. As part of this reform, the Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission developed a method for diverting 25% of nonviolent, prison-bound offenders into alternative sanction programs using risk assessment to identify the lowest risk offenders. This article describes an evaluation of the effectiveness of this instrument, used by judges at the time of sentencing. It serves to advance an understanding of the factors associated with recidivism and the policy implications of using risk assessment to divert offenders from incarceration at a time when states are facing fiscal challenges.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)106-132
Number of pages27
JournalCrime and Delinquency
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

risk assessment
offender
Prisons
sanction
correctional institution
Guidelines
reform
human being
evaluation
time

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Kleiman, Matthew ; Ostrom, Brian J. ; Cheesman, Fred L. / Using risk assessment to inform sentencing decisions for nonviolent offenders in Virginia. In: Crime and Delinquency. 2007 ; Vol. 53, No. 1. pp. 106-132.
@article{3e6c4506befc4b41b3a973b1f564c081,
title = "Using risk assessment to inform sentencing decisions for nonviolent offenders in Virginia",
abstract = "Virginia has abolished parole and adopted truth-in-sentencing guidelines for persons convicted of felonies. As part of this reform, the Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission developed a method for diverting 25{\%} of nonviolent, prison-bound offenders into alternative sanction programs using risk assessment to identify the lowest risk offenders. This article describes an evaluation of the effectiveness of this instrument, used by judges at the time of sentencing. It serves to advance an understanding of the factors associated with recidivism and the policy implications of using risk assessment to divert offenders from incarceration at a time when states are facing fiscal challenges.",
author = "Matthew Kleiman and Ostrom, {Brian J.} and Cheesman, {Fred L.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0011128706294442",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "106--132",
journal = "Crime and Delinquency",
issn = "0011-1287",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Using risk assessment to inform sentencing decisions for nonviolent offenders in Virginia. / Kleiman, Matthew; Ostrom, Brian J.; Cheesman, Fred L.

In: Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 53, No. 1, 01.01.2007, p. 106-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using risk assessment to inform sentencing decisions for nonviolent offenders in Virginia

AU - Kleiman, Matthew

AU - Ostrom, Brian J.

AU - Cheesman, Fred L.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Virginia has abolished parole and adopted truth-in-sentencing guidelines for persons convicted of felonies. As part of this reform, the Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission developed a method for diverting 25% of nonviolent, prison-bound offenders into alternative sanction programs using risk assessment to identify the lowest risk offenders. This article describes an evaluation of the effectiveness of this instrument, used by judges at the time of sentencing. It serves to advance an understanding of the factors associated with recidivism and the policy implications of using risk assessment to divert offenders from incarceration at a time when states are facing fiscal challenges.

AB - Virginia has abolished parole and adopted truth-in-sentencing guidelines for persons convicted of felonies. As part of this reform, the Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission developed a method for diverting 25% of nonviolent, prison-bound offenders into alternative sanction programs using risk assessment to identify the lowest risk offenders. This article describes an evaluation of the effectiveness of this instrument, used by judges at the time of sentencing. It serves to advance an understanding of the factors associated with recidivism and the policy implications of using risk assessment to divert offenders from incarceration at a time when states are facing fiscal challenges.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845432936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845432936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0011128706294442

DO - 10.1177/0011128706294442

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33845432936

VL - 53

SP - 106

EP - 132

JO - Crime and Delinquency

JF - Crime and Delinquency

SN - 0011-1287

IS - 1

ER -