Using SNAPPS to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties

A randomized comparison group trial

Terry Wolpaw, Klara K. Papp, Georges Bordage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: When medical students present cases to preceptors, they focus mainly on factual information and reveal little about their diagnostic reasoning or uncertainties. Do third-year students using the six-step, learner-centered SNAPPS technique (Summarize history and findings, Narrow the differential; Analyze the differential; Probe preceptor about uncertainties; Plan management; Select case-related issues for self-study) for case presentations to family medicine ambulatory care preceptors express clinical reasoning and learning issues more than students not trained in the technique? METHOD: The authors conducted a posttest-only, comparison groups, randomized trial in 2004-2005 with 64 students in three groups: SNAPPS training, feedback training (controlling for training time), and usual-and-customary instruction. SNAPPS training combined brief faculty development with more extensive learner development followed by practice during a four-week family medicine rotation. During the last week, students audiotaped case presentations, which the authors coded for 10 dependent variables organized into six outcome categories that measure expression of clinical diagnostic reasoning and learning issues. RESULTS: The authors coded 66 SNAPPS, 67 comparison, and 82 usual-and-customary case presentations. Students in the SNAPPS group outperformed students in comparison and usual-and-customary groups for each outcome category. SNAPPS presentations were no longer than usual presentations but were one minute longer than those of the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: SNAPPS greatly facilitates and enhances expression of diagnostic reasoning and uncertainties during case presentations to ambulatory care preceptors. Students can conduct case presentations using a technique that makes each step explicit and gives learners, rather than preceptors, the responsibility for expressing their clinical reasoning and uncertainties.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)517-524
Number of pages8
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume84
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
uncertainty
Students
Group
student
diagnostic
Ambulatory Care
Medicine
Learning
medicine
self-study
Medical Students
learning
medical student
History
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
instruction
responsibility
history
management

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

@article{3266193f15ff4632a1d1382bfe82575b,
title = "Using SNAPPS to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties: A randomized comparison group trial",
abstract = "PURPOSE: When medical students present cases to preceptors, they focus mainly on factual information and reveal little about their diagnostic reasoning or uncertainties. Do third-year students using the six-step, learner-centered SNAPPS technique (Summarize history and findings, Narrow the differential; Analyze the differential; Probe preceptor about uncertainties; Plan management; Select case-related issues for self-study) for case presentations to family medicine ambulatory care preceptors express clinical reasoning and learning issues more than students not trained in the technique? METHOD: The authors conducted a posttest-only, comparison groups, randomized trial in 2004-2005 with 64 students in three groups: SNAPPS training, feedback training (controlling for training time), and usual-and-customary instruction. SNAPPS training combined brief faculty development with more extensive learner development followed by practice during a four-week family medicine rotation. During the last week, students audiotaped case presentations, which the authors coded for 10 dependent variables organized into six outcome categories that measure expression of clinical diagnostic reasoning and learning issues. RESULTS: The authors coded 66 SNAPPS, 67 comparison, and 82 usual-and-customary case presentations. Students in the SNAPPS group outperformed students in comparison and usual-and-customary groups for each outcome category. SNAPPS presentations were no longer than usual presentations but were one minute longer than those of the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: SNAPPS greatly facilitates and enhances expression of diagnostic reasoning and uncertainties during case presentations to ambulatory care preceptors. Students can conduct case presentations using a technique that makes each step explicit and gives learners, rather than preceptors, the responsibility for expressing their clinical reasoning and uncertainties.",
author = "Terry Wolpaw and Papp, {Klara K.} and Georges Bordage",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a8cbf",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "517--524",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

Using SNAPPS to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties : A randomized comparison group trial. / Wolpaw, Terry; Papp, Klara K.; Bordage, Georges.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 84, No. 4, 04.2009, p. 517-524.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using SNAPPS to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties

T2 - A randomized comparison group trial

AU - Wolpaw, Terry

AU - Papp, Klara K.

AU - Bordage, Georges

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - PURPOSE: When medical students present cases to preceptors, they focus mainly on factual information and reveal little about their diagnostic reasoning or uncertainties. Do third-year students using the six-step, learner-centered SNAPPS technique (Summarize history and findings, Narrow the differential; Analyze the differential; Probe preceptor about uncertainties; Plan management; Select case-related issues for self-study) for case presentations to family medicine ambulatory care preceptors express clinical reasoning and learning issues more than students not trained in the technique? METHOD: The authors conducted a posttest-only, comparison groups, randomized trial in 2004-2005 with 64 students in three groups: SNAPPS training, feedback training (controlling for training time), and usual-and-customary instruction. SNAPPS training combined brief faculty development with more extensive learner development followed by practice during a four-week family medicine rotation. During the last week, students audiotaped case presentations, which the authors coded for 10 dependent variables organized into six outcome categories that measure expression of clinical diagnostic reasoning and learning issues. RESULTS: The authors coded 66 SNAPPS, 67 comparison, and 82 usual-and-customary case presentations. Students in the SNAPPS group outperformed students in comparison and usual-and-customary groups for each outcome category. SNAPPS presentations were no longer than usual presentations but were one minute longer than those of the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: SNAPPS greatly facilitates and enhances expression of diagnostic reasoning and uncertainties during case presentations to ambulatory care preceptors. Students can conduct case presentations using a technique that makes each step explicit and gives learners, rather than preceptors, the responsibility for expressing their clinical reasoning and uncertainties.

AB - PURPOSE: When medical students present cases to preceptors, they focus mainly on factual information and reveal little about their diagnostic reasoning or uncertainties. Do third-year students using the six-step, learner-centered SNAPPS technique (Summarize history and findings, Narrow the differential; Analyze the differential; Probe preceptor about uncertainties; Plan management; Select case-related issues for self-study) for case presentations to family medicine ambulatory care preceptors express clinical reasoning and learning issues more than students not trained in the technique? METHOD: The authors conducted a posttest-only, comparison groups, randomized trial in 2004-2005 with 64 students in three groups: SNAPPS training, feedback training (controlling for training time), and usual-and-customary instruction. SNAPPS training combined brief faculty development with more extensive learner development followed by practice during a four-week family medicine rotation. During the last week, students audiotaped case presentations, which the authors coded for 10 dependent variables organized into six outcome categories that measure expression of clinical diagnostic reasoning and learning issues. RESULTS: The authors coded 66 SNAPPS, 67 comparison, and 82 usual-and-customary case presentations. Students in the SNAPPS group outperformed students in comparison and usual-and-customary groups for each outcome category. SNAPPS presentations were no longer than usual presentations but were one minute longer than those of the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: SNAPPS greatly facilitates and enhances expression of diagnostic reasoning and uncertainties during case presentations to ambulatory care preceptors. Students can conduct case presentations using a technique that makes each step explicit and gives learners, rather than preceptors, the responsibility for expressing their clinical reasoning and uncertainties.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65249126843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65249126843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a8cbf

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a8cbf

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 517

EP - 524

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 4

ER -