Utah regional differences in respirator use and fit testing among pesticide applicators

Michael Pate, F. R. Beard, K. Hall

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine regional differences within Utah in response to piloting a mobile respirator training and fit assessment program for pesticide applicators. The objectives were to describe worker perceptions of respirator use and training experiences. Pilot trainings were offered in two southern counties and two northern counties of Utah. A total of 141 individuals completed the post-training questionnaire regarding use and fit testing experience with respirators as well as perceptions of the benefits to protecting respiratory health. The majority of respondents were male (95.7%, f = 112). The proportion of participants in the southern counties who had respirator training experience (61.0%, f = 25) was not significantly higher (X 2 = 3.763, df = 1, p = 0.05) than the proportion of participants in the northern counties (43.0%, f = 43). Three-fourths (73.5%, f = 72) of participants in the northern counties agreed that they expect to wear a respirator in dusty conditions, while two-thirds (61.0%, f = 25) of participants in the southern counties agreed that they expect to wear a respirator in dusty conditions. The results indicated that more training should be done to improve perceptions and beliefs about using respirators. A high priority for this population will be identification of comfortable respi as well as communicating the importance of proper fit testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages55-66
Number of pages12
Volume23
No1
Specialist publicationJournal of Agricultural Safety and Health
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Respirators
Applicators
Mechanical Ventilators
Pesticides
Testing
questionnaires
testing
Wear of materials
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@misc{498e3cac3d0a45c29d803e6e95aa1083,
title = "Utah regional differences in respirator use and fit testing among pesticide applicators",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to determine regional differences within Utah in response to piloting a mobile respirator training and fit assessment program for pesticide applicators. The objectives were to describe worker perceptions of respirator use and training experiences. Pilot trainings were offered in two southern counties and two northern counties of Utah. A total of 141 individuals completed the post-training questionnaire regarding use and fit testing experience with respirators as well as perceptions of the benefits to protecting respiratory health. The majority of respondents were male (95.7{\%}, f = 112). The proportion of participants in the southern counties who had respirator training experience (61.0{\%}, f = 25) was not significantly higher (X 2 = 3.763, df = 1, p = 0.05) than the proportion of participants in the northern counties (43.0{\%}, f = 43). Three-fourths (73.5{\%}, f = 72) of participants in the northern counties agreed that they expect to wear a respirator in dusty conditions, while two-thirds (61.0{\%}, f = 25) of participants in the southern counties agreed that they expect to wear a respirator in dusty conditions. The results indicated that more training should be done to improve perceptions and beliefs about using respirators. A high priority for this population will be identification of comfortable respi as well as communicating the importance of proper fit testing.",
author = "Michael Pate and Beard, {F. R.} and K. Hall",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.13031/jash.11765",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "55--66",
journal = "Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health",
issn = "1074-7583",
publisher = "American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers",

}

Utah regional differences in respirator use and fit testing among pesticide applicators. / Pate, Michael; Beard, F. R.; Hall, K.

In: Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 55-66.

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

TY - GEN

T1 - Utah regional differences in respirator use and fit testing among pesticide applicators

AU - Pate, Michael

AU - Beard, F. R.

AU - Hall, K.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to determine regional differences within Utah in response to piloting a mobile respirator training and fit assessment program for pesticide applicators. The objectives were to describe worker perceptions of respirator use and training experiences. Pilot trainings were offered in two southern counties and two northern counties of Utah. A total of 141 individuals completed the post-training questionnaire regarding use and fit testing experience with respirators as well as perceptions of the benefits to protecting respiratory health. The majority of respondents were male (95.7%, f = 112). The proportion of participants in the southern counties who had respirator training experience (61.0%, f = 25) was not significantly higher (X 2 = 3.763, df = 1, p = 0.05) than the proportion of participants in the northern counties (43.0%, f = 43). Three-fourths (73.5%, f = 72) of participants in the northern counties agreed that they expect to wear a respirator in dusty conditions, while two-thirds (61.0%, f = 25) of participants in the southern counties agreed that they expect to wear a respirator in dusty conditions. The results indicated that more training should be done to improve perceptions and beliefs about using respirators. A high priority for this population will be identification of comfortable respi as well as communicating the importance of proper fit testing.

AB - The purpose of this study was to determine regional differences within Utah in response to piloting a mobile respirator training and fit assessment program for pesticide applicators. The objectives were to describe worker perceptions of respirator use and training experiences. Pilot trainings were offered in two southern counties and two northern counties of Utah. A total of 141 individuals completed the post-training questionnaire regarding use and fit testing experience with respirators as well as perceptions of the benefits to protecting respiratory health. The majority of respondents were male (95.7%, f = 112). The proportion of participants in the southern counties who had respirator training experience (61.0%, f = 25) was not significantly higher (X 2 = 3.763, df = 1, p = 0.05) than the proportion of participants in the northern counties (43.0%, f = 43). Three-fourths (73.5%, f = 72) of participants in the northern counties agreed that they expect to wear a respirator in dusty conditions, while two-thirds (61.0%, f = 25) of participants in the southern counties agreed that they expect to wear a respirator in dusty conditions. The results indicated that more training should be done to improve perceptions and beliefs about using respirators. A high priority for this population will be identification of comfortable respi as well as communicating the importance of proper fit testing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013378463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013378463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.13031/jash.11765

DO - 10.13031/jash.11765

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 55

EP - 66

JO - Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health

JF - Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health

SN - 1074-7583

ER -