Validating the functional capacity index as a measure of outcome following blunt multiple trauma

Ellen J. MacKenzie; W. J. Sacco; S. Luchter; J. F. Ditunno; C. Forrester Staz; G. S. Gruen; D. W. Marion; W. C. Schwab; Jeffrey J. Bednarski; Frederick C. Beyer; Matthew Indeck; Robert A. Jubelirer; S. Lee Miller; Michael D. Pasquale; Andrew B. Pietzman; C. William Schwab; J. Stanley Smith; Raymond C. Talucci; Ricard N. Townsend; Jerome J. Vernick

doi:10.1023/A:1020820017658

Validating the functional capacity index as a measure of outcome following blunt multiple trauma

Ellen J. MacKenzie, W. J. Sacco, S. Luchter, J. F. Ditunno, C. Forrester Staz, G. S. Gruen, D. W. Marion, W. C. Schwab, Jeffrey J. Bednarski, Frederick C. Beyer, Matthew Indeck, Robert A. Jubelirer, S. Lee Miller, Michael D. Pasquale, Andrew B. Pietzman, C. William Schwab, J. Stanley Smith, Raymond C. Talucci, Ricard N. Townsend, Jerome J. Vernick

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

43 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Background: The validity of the Functional Capacity Index (FCI) is evaluated by examining its distributional characteristics, its correlation with other well-known measures of outcome and its ability to discriminate among persons with injuries of varying type and severity. Methods: A telephone survey which included the FCI and the SF-36 was administered 1 year post-injury to 1240 blunt trauma patients discharged from 12 trauma centers. A subsample of 656 patients also completed the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) by mail. Results: FCI scores correlated well with the physical health subscores of the SIP and SF-36. They also correlated well with self-reported change in health status and return to work. The FCI, when compared to either the SF-36 or the SIP, however, appears to discriminate better among patients according to the presence and severity of head trauma. Conclusions: While further testing of the FCI is needed, it holds promise as a preference based measure for assessing the physical impact of trauma.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	797-808
Number of pages	12
Journal	Quality of Life Research
Volume	11
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020820017658
State	Published - Dec 2002

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1023/A:1020820017658

Cite this

MacKenzie, E. J., Sacco, W. J., Luchter, S., Ditunno, J. F., Staz, C. F., Gruen, G. S., Marion, D. W., Schwab, W. C., Bednarski, J. J., Beyer, F. C., Indeck, M., Jubelirer, R. A., Miller, S. L., Pasquale, M. D., Pietzman, A. B., Schwab, C. W., Smith, J. S., Talucci, R. C., Townsend, R. N., & Vernick, J. J. (2002). Validating the functional capacity index as a measure of outcome following blunt multiple trauma. Quality of Life Research, 11(8), 797-808. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020820017658

@article{9692e63104a742d88b325dec79e5ff61,

title = "Validating the functional capacity index as a measure of outcome following blunt multiple trauma",

abstract = "Background: The validity of the Functional Capacity Index (FCI) is evaluated by examining its distributional characteristics, its correlation with other well-known measures of outcome and its ability to discriminate among persons with injuries of varying type and severity. Methods: A telephone survey which included the FCI and the SF-36 was administered 1 year post-injury to 1240 blunt trauma patients discharged from 12 trauma centers. A subsample of 656 patients also completed the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) by mail. Results: FCI scores correlated well with the physical health subscores of the SIP and SF-36. They also correlated well with self-reported change in health status and return to work. The FCI, when compared to either the SF-36 or the SIP, however, appears to discriminate better among patients according to the presence and severity of head trauma. Conclusions: While further testing of the FCI is needed, it holds promise as a preference based measure for assessing the physical impact of trauma.",

author = "MacKenzie, {Ellen J.} and Sacco, {W. J.} and S. Luchter and Ditunno, {J. F.} and Staz, {C. Forrester} and Gruen, {G. S.} and Marion, {D. W.} and Schwab, {W. C.} and Bednarski, {Jeffrey J.} and Beyer, {Frederick C.} and Matthew Indeck and Jubelirer, {Robert A.} and Miller, {S. Lee} and Pasquale, {Michael D.} and Pietzman, {Andrew B.} and Schwab, {C. William} and Smith, {J. Stanley} and Talucci, {Raymond C.} and Townsend, {Ricard N.} and Vernick, {Jerome J.}",

note = "Funding Information: Supported by Cooperative Agreement DTNH22-94-H-06014 from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration of the US Department of Transportation and Grant R49/CCR302486 from the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the study coordinators whose hard work and diligence made this study possible.",

year = "2002",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1023/A:1020820017658",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "11",

pages = "797--808",

journal = "Quality of Life Research",

issn = "0962-9343",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "8",

}

MacKenzie, EJ, Sacco, WJ, Luchter, S, Ditunno, JF, Staz, CF, Gruen, GS, Marion, DW, Schwab, WC, Bednarski, JJ, Beyer, FC, Indeck, M, Jubelirer, RA, Miller, SL, Pasquale, MD, Pietzman, AB, Schwab, CW, Smith, JS, Talucci, RC, Townsend, RN & Vernick, JJ 2002, 'Validating the functional capacity index as a measure of outcome following blunt multiple trauma', Quality of Life Research, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 797-808. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020820017658

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validating the functional capacity index as a measure of outcome following blunt multiple trauma

AU - MacKenzie, Ellen J.

AU - Sacco, W. J.

AU - Luchter, S.

AU - Ditunno, J. F.

AU - Staz, C. Forrester

AU - Gruen, G. S.

AU - Marion, D. W.

AU - Schwab, W. C.

AU - Bednarski, Jeffrey J.

AU - Beyer, Frederick C.

AU - Indeck, Matthew

AU - Jubelirer, Robert A.

AU - Miller, S. Lee

AU - Pasquale, Michael D.

AU - Pietzman, Andrew B.

AU - Schwab, C. William

AU - Smith, J. Stanley

AU - Talucci, Raymond C.

AU - Townsend, Ricard N.

AU - Vernick, Jerome J.

N1 - Funding Information: Supported by Cooperative Agreement DTNH22-94-H-06014 from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration of the US Department of Transportation and Grant R49/CCR302486 from the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the study coordinators whose hard work and diligence made this study possible.

PY - 2002/12

Y1 - 2002/12

N2 - Background: The validity of the Functional Capacity Index (FCI) is evaluated by examining its distributional characteristics, its correlation with other well-known measures of outcome and its ability to discriminate among persons with injuries of varying type and severity. Methods: A telephone survey which included the FCI and the SF-36 was administered 1 year post-injury to 1240 blunt trauma patients discharged from 12 trauma centers. A subsample of 656 patients also completed the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) by mail. Results: FCI scores correlated well with the physical health subscores of the SIP and SF-36. They also correlated well with self-reported change in health status and return to work. The FCI, when compared to either the SF-36 or the SIP, however, appears to discriminate better among patients according to the presence and severity of head trauma. Conclusions: While further testing of the FCI is needed, it holds promise as a preference based measure for assessing the physical impact of trauma.

AB - Background: The validity of the Functional Capacity Index (FCI) is evaluated by examining its distributional characteristics, its correlation with other well-known measures of outcome and its ability to discriminate among persons with injuries of varying type and severity. Methods: A telephone survey which included the FCI and the SF-36 was administered 1 year post-injury to 1240 blunt trauma patients discharged from 12 trauma centers. A subsample of 656 patients also completed the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) by mail. Results: FCI scores correlated well with the physical health subscores of the SIP and SF-36. They also correlated well with self-reported change in health status and return to work. The FCI, when compared to either the SF-36 or the SIP, however, appears to discriminate better among patients according to the presence and severity of head trauma. Conclusions: While further testing of the FCI is needed, it holds promise as a preference based measure for assessing the physical impact of trauma.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036891725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036891725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1020820017658

DO - 10.1023/A:1020820017658

M3 - Article

C2 - 12482163

AN - SCOPUS:0036891725

SN - 0962-9343

VL - 11

SP - 797

EP - 808

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

IS - 8

ER -

Validating the functional capacity index as a measure of outcome following blunt multiple trauma

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this