Validating the support gaps framework: Longitudinal effects and moderators of experiencing deficits and surpluses during supportive interactions

Jenny L. Crowley, Andrew C. High

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Support gaps, or discrepancies between the support a person desires and receives, have implications for how effectively people cope with stressors. Existing research commonly uses recall procedures to assess support gaps, considers only immediate outcomes, and does not often assess predictors of gaps. To validate the support gaps framework, participants (N = 200) assessed their desires for support regarding an identity-threatening stressor just prior to a laboratory-based interaction and received support immediately following the interaction. Longitudinal outcomes and the moderating role of ability and motivation were also considered. Participants experienced support gaps, which were associated with their rumination and affect improvement three weeks after the interaction. Ability and motivation influenced the size of support gaps, and ability moderated the effect of a gap in esteem support on participants’ affect improvement. Implications related to an emerging theory of support gaps and the dual-process theory of supportive communication outcomes are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-53
Number of pages25
JournalCommunication Quarterly
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

Fingerprint

Moderators
moderator
deficit
ability
interaction
Communication
human being
communication

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication

Cite this

@article{589dde3ef71848b4a4610850969cf8b2,
title = "Validating the support gaps framework: Longitudinal effects and moderators of experiencing deficits and surpluses during supportive interactions",
abstract = "Support gaps, or discrepancies between the support a person desires and receives, have implications for how effectively people cope with stressors. Existing research commonly uses recall procedures to assess support gaps, considers only immediate outcomes, and does not often assess predictors of gaps. To validate the support gaps framework, participants (N = 200) assessed their desires for support regarding an identity-threatening stressor just prior to a laboratory-based interaction and received support immediately following the interaction. Longitudinal outcomes and the moderating role of ability and motivation were also considered. Participants experienced support gaps, which were associated with their rumination and affect improvement three weeks after the interaction. Ability and motivation influenced the size of support gaps, and ability moderated the effect of a gap in esteem support on participants’ affect improvement. Implications related to an emerging theory of support gaps and the dual-process theory of supportive communication outcomes are discussed.",
author = "Crowley, {Jenny L.} and High, {Andrew C.}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01463373.2019.1668447",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "29--53",
journal = "Communication Quarterly",
issn = "0146-3373",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validating the support gaps framework

T2 - Longitudinal effects and moderators of experiencing deficits and surpluses during supportive interactions

AU - Crowley, Jenny L.

AU - High, Andrew C.

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Support gaps, or discrepancies between the support a person desires and receives, have implications for how effectively people cope with stressors. Existing research commonly uses recall procedures to assess support gaps, considers only immediate outcomes, and does not often assess predictors of gaps. To validate the support gaps framework, participants (N = 200) assessed their desires for support regarding an identity-threatening stressor just prior to a laboratory-based interaction and received support immediately following the interaction. Longitudinal outcomes and the moderating role of ability and motivation were also considered. Participants experienced support gaps, which were associated with their rumination and affect improvement three weeks after the interaction. Ability and motivation influenced the size of support gaps, and ability moderated the effect of a gap in esteem support on participants’ affect improvement. Implications related to an emerging theory of support gaps and the dual-process theory of supportive communication outcomes are discussed.

AB - Support gaps, or discrepancies between the support a person desires and receives, have implications for how effectively people cope with stressors. Existing research commonly uses recall procedures to assess support gaps, considers only immediate outcomes, and does not often assess predictors of gaps. To validate the support gaps framework, participants (N = 200) assessed their desires for support regarding an identity-threatening stressor just prior to a laboratory-based interaction and received support immediately following the interaction. Longitudinal outcomes and the moderating role of ability and motivation were also considered. Participants experienced support gaps, which were associated with their rumination and affect improvement three weeks after the interaction. Ability and motivation influenced the size of support gaps, and ability moderated the effect of a gap in esteem support on participants’ affect improvement. Implications related to an emerging theory of support gaps and the dual-process theory of supportive communication outcomes are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073965327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073965327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01463373.2019.1668447

DO - 10.1080/01463373.2019.1668447

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073965327

VL - 68

SP - 29

EP - 53

JO - Communication Quarterly

JF - Communication Quarterly

SN - 0146-3373

IS - 1

ER -