Validity and interaction in the ZPD

Interpreting learner development through L2 Dynamic Assessment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on Vygotsky's articulation of the zone of proximal development, dynamic assessment (DA) involves offering mediation to help learners perform beyond their level of independent functioning while simultaneously supporting development of those abilities, and thus integrating teaching and assessment as a single activity. As with any assessment, it is imperative to determine how well L2 DA fulfills its intended purposes, namely providing insights into abilities that are still forming and promoting development. While concerns have been raised over adopting existing concepts and procedures in validation for use in the classroom, this paper relies on key validity notions of evidence, interpretations, and consequences to consider the process of mediator-learner dialoguing on a micro level as well as outcomes of DA interactions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)244-263
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Applied Linguistics
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2011

Fingerprint

interaction
ability
micro level
mediation
Interaction
Dynamic Assessment
classroom
interpretation
Teaching
evidence
Articulation
Zone of Proximal Development
L. S. Vygotsky
Mediation
Mediator

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{64bb2f61b678484dad4716e0aeda860e,
title = "Validity and interaction in the ZPD: Interpreting learner development through L2 Dynamic Assessment",
abstract = "Based on Vygotsky's articulation of the zone of proximal development, dynamic assessment (DA) involves offering mediation to help learners perform beyond their level of independent functioning while simultaneously supporting development of those abilities, and thus integrating teaching and assessment as a single activity. As with any assessment, it is imperative to determine how well L2 DA fulfills its intended purposes, namely providing insights into abilities that are still forming and promoting development. While concerns have been raised over adopting existing concepts and procedures in validation for use in the classroom, this paper relies on key validity notions of evidence, interpretations, and consequences to consider the process of mediator-learner dialoguing on a micro level as well as outcomes of DA interactions.",
author = "Poehner, {Matthew Edward}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1473-4192.2010.00277.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "244--263",
journal = "International Journal of Applied Linguistics",
issn = "0802-6106",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity and interaction in the ZPD

T2 - Interpreting learner development through L2 Dynamic Assessment

AU - Poehner, Matthew Edward

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - Based on Vygotsky's articulation of the zone of proximal development, dynamic assessment (DA) involves offering mediation to help learners perform beyond their level of independent functioning while simultaneously supporting development of those abilities, and thus integrating teaching and assessment as a single activity. As with any assessment, it is imperative to determine how well L2 DA fulfills its intended purposes, namely providing insights into abilities that are still forming and promoting development. While concerns have been raised over adopting existing concepts and procedures in validation for use in the classroom, this paper relies on key validity notions of evidence, interpretations, and consequences to consider the process of mediator-learner dialoguing on a micro level as well as outcomes of DA interactions.

AB - Based on Vygotsky's articulation of the zone of proximal development, dynamic assessment (DA) involves offering mediation to help learners perform beyond their level of independent functioning while simultaneously supporting development of those abilities, and thus integrating teaching and assessment as a single activity. As with any assessment, it is imperative to determine how well L2 DA fulfills its intended purposes, namely providing insights into abilities that are still forming and promoting development. While concerns have been raised over adopting existing concepts and procedures in validation for use in the classroom, this paper relies on key validity notions of evidence, interpretations, and consequences to consider the process of mediator-learner dialoguing on a micro level as well as outcomes of DA interactions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960450082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960450082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2010.00277.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2010.00277.x

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 244

EP - 263

JO - International Journal of Applied Linguistics

JF - International Journal of Applied Linguistics

SN - 0802-6106

IS - 2

ER -