1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Identifying intimate partner violence in healthcare settings is becoming the standard of care. The Brief Inpatient Screen was designed to assess recent emotional, physical, and sexual abuse in a general inpatient medical-surgical setting and compared to the Composite Abuse Scale. Methods: Researchers matched "cases" (inpatients screening Brief Inpatient Screen-positive) to up to four "controls" (inpatients screening Brief Inpatient Screen-negative). Forty-six female hospital inpatients ages 18-64 years completed a self-administered survey. The sensitivity and specificity of the Brief Inpatient Screen and its subscales were compared to the Composite Abuse Scale. Researchers examined the performance of the Brief Inpatient Screen when used as a verbal screen versus an anonymous written screen. Results: Twelve of 46 participants (26%) had a positive screen. Compared to the Composite Abuse Scale, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the verbal Brief Inpatient Screen were 52.6% (95% CI 28.9-75.6) and 92.6% (95% CI 75.7-99.1), respectively. The written Brief Inpatient Screen showed improved sensitivity overall (68.4%, 95% CI 43.5-87.4) for the most severe intimate partner violence. Subscale analysis revealed greater sensitivity for emotional and severe combined intimate partner violence. Conclusions: The verbal Brief Inpatient Screen, when compared to the Composite Abuse Scale, was limited in its ability to identify intimate partner violence. An anonymous written format improved sensitivity. Future research should optimize intimate partner violence screening among inpatients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)679-699
Number of pages21
JournalWomen and Health
Volume52
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012

Fingerprint

Inpatients
Intimate Partner Violence
Research Personnel
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sex Offenses
Standard of Care
Delivery of Health Care

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{3abbeb8a8cbc4cfaa88f67df27f4424e,
title = "Validity of the Brief Inpatient Screen for Intimate Partner Violence Among Adult Women",
abstract = "Background: Identifying intimate partner violence in healthcare settings is becoming the standard of care. The Brief Inpatient Screen was designed to assess recent emotional, physical, and sexual abuse in a general inpatient medical-surgical setting and compared to the Composite Abuse Scale. Methods: Researchers matched {"}cases{"} (inpatients screening Brief Inpatient Screen-positive) to up to four {"}controls{"} (inpatients screening Brief Inpatient Screen-negative). Forty-six female hospital inpatients ages 18-64 years completed a self-administered survey. The sensitivity and specificity of the Brief Inpatient Screen and its subscales were compared to the Composite Abuse Scale. Researchers examined the performance of the Brief Inpatient Screen when used as a verbal screen versus an anonymous written screen. Results: Twelve of 46 participants (26{\%}) had a positive screen. Compared to the Composite Abuse Scale, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the verbal Brief Inpatient Screen were 52.6{\%} (95{\%} CI 28.9-75.6) and 92.6{\%} (95{\%} CI 75.7-99.1), respectively. The written Brief Inpatient Screen showed improved sensitivity overall (68.4{\%}, 95{\%} CI 43.5-87.4) for the most severe intimate partner violence. Subscale analysis revealed greater sensitivity for emotional and severe combined intimate partner violence. Conclusions: The verbal Brief Inpatient Screen, when compared to the Composite Abuse Scale, was limited in its ability to identify intimate partner violence. An anonymous written format improved sensitivity. Future research should optimize intimate partner violence screening among inpatients.",
author = "Laurie, {Anna R.} and John Showalter and Toya Pratt and Ballentine, {Noel H.} and Chinchilli, {Vernon M.} and McCall-Hosenfeld, {Jennifer S.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03630242.2012.724763",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "679--699",
journal = "Women and Health",
issn = "0363-0242",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7",

}

Validity of the Brief Inpatient Screen for Intimate Partner Violence Among Adult Women. / Laurie, Anna R.; Showalter, John; Pratt, Toya; Ballentine, Noel H.; Chinchilli, Vernon M.; McCall-Hosenfeld, Jennifer S.

In: Women and Health, Vol. 52, No. 7, 01.10.2012, p. 679-699.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of the Brief Inpatient Screen for Intimate Partner Violence Among Adult Women

AU - Laurie, Anna R.

AU - Showalter, John

AU - Pratt, Toya

AU - Ballentine, Noel H.

AU - Chinchilli, Vernon M.

AU - McCall-Hosenfeld, Jennifer S.

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Background: Identifying intimate partner violence in healthcare settings is becoming the standard of care. The Brief Inpatient Screen was designed to assess recent emotional, physical, and sexual abuse in a general inpatient medical-surgical setting and compared to the Composite Abuse Scale. Methods: Researchers matched "cases" (inpatients screening Brief Inpatient Screen-positive) to up to four "controls" (inpatients screening Brief Inpatient Screen-negative). Forty-six female hospital inpatients ages 18-64 years completed a self-administered survey. The sensitivity and specificity of the Brief Inpatient Screen and its subscales were compared to the Composite Abuse Scale. Researchers examined the performance of the Brief Inpatient Screen when used as a verbal screen versus an anonymous written screen. Results: Twelve of 46 participants (26%) had a positive screen. Compared to the Composite Abuse Scale, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the verbal Brief Inpatient Screen were 52.6% (95% CI 28.9-75.6) and 92.6% (95% CI 75.7-99.1), respectively. The written Brief Inpatient Screen showed improved sensitivity overall (68.4%, 95% CI 43.5-87.4) for the most severe intimate partner violence. Subscale analysis revealed greater sensitivity for emotional and severe combined intimate partner violence. Conclusions: The verbal Brief Inpatient Screen, when compared to the Composite Abuse Scale, was limited in its ability to identify intimate partner violence. An anonymous written format improved sensitivity. Future research should optimize intimate partner violence screening among inpatients.

AB - Background: Identifying intimate partner violence in healthcare settings is becoming the standard of care. The Brief Inpatient Screen was designed to assess recent emotional, physical, and sexual abuse in a general inpatient medical-surgical setting and compared to the Composite Abuse Scale. Methods: Researchers matched "cases" (inpatients screening Brief Inpatient Screen-positive) to up to four "controls" (inpatients screening Brief Inpatient Screen-negative). Forty-six female hospital inpatients ages 18-64 years completed a self-administered survey. The sensitivity and specificity of the Brief Inpatient Screen and its subscales were compared to the Composite Abuse Scale. Researchers examined the performance of the Brief Inpatient Screen when used as a verbal screen versus an anonymous written screen. Results: Twelve of 46 participants (26%) had a positive screen. Compared to the Composite Abuse Scale, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the verbal Brief Inpatient Screen were 52.6% (95% CI 28.9-75.6) and 92.6% (95% CI 75.7-99.1), respectively. The written Brief Inpatient Screen showed improved sensitivity overall (68.4%, 95% CI 43.5-87.4) for the most severe intimate partner violence. Subscale analysis revealed greater sensitivity for emotional and severe combined intimate partner violence. Conclusions: The verbal Brief Inpatient Screen, when compared to the Composite Abuse Scale, was limited in its ability to identify intimate partner violence. An anonymous written format improved sensitivity. Future research should optimize intimate partner violence screening among inpatients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867515472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867515472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03630242.2012.724763

DO - 10.1080/03630242.2012.724763

M3 - Article

C2 - 23067152

AN - SCOPUS:84867515472

VL - 52

SP - 679

EP - 699

JO - Women and Health

JF - Women and Health

SN - 0363-0242

IS - 7

ER -