Valuing Our Communities

Ethical Considerations for Economic Evaluation of Community-Based Prevention

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Restricted public budgets and increasing efforts to link the impact of community interventions to public savings have increased the use of economic evaluation. While this type of evaluation can be important for program planning, it also raises important ethical issues about how we value the time of local stakeholders who support community interventions. In particular, researchers navigate issues of scientific accuracy, institutional inequality, and research utility in their pursuit of even basic cost estimates. We provide an example of how we confronted these issues when estimating the costs of a large-scale community-based intervention. Principles for valuing community members’ time and conducting economic evaluations of community programs are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-315
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Community Psychology
Volume60
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
evaluation
community
economics
public budget
Costs and Cost Analysis
program planning
Budgets
costs
Ethics
savings
stakeholder
Research Personnel
Research
Values
time

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{5e51c60b931446218e84cefa753d78e3,
title = "Valuing Our Communities: Ethical Considerations for Economic Evaluation of Community-Based Prevention",
abstract = "Restricted public budgets and increasing efforts to link the impact of community interventions to public savings have increased the use of economic evaluation. While this type of evaluation can be important for program planning, it also raises important ethical issues about how we value the time of local stakeholders who support community interventions. In particular, researchers navigate issues of scientific accuracy, institutional inequality, and research utility in their pursuit of even basic cost estimates. We provide an example of how we confronted these issues when estimating the costs of a large-scale community-based intervention. Principles for valuing community members’ time and conducting economic evaluations of community programs are discussed.",
author = "Crowley, {Daniel Max} and Jones, {Damon Evan}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ajcp.12200",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "309--315",
journal = "American Journal of Community Psychology",
issn = "0091-0562",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Valuing Our Communities

T2 - Ethical Considerations for Economic Evaluation of Community-Based Prevention

AU - Crowley, Daniel Max

AU - Jones, Damon Evan

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Restricted public budgets and increasing efforts to link the impact of community interventions to public savings have increased the use of economic evaluation. While this type of evaluation can be important for program planning, it also raises important ethical issues about how we value the time of local stakeholders who support community interventions. In particular, researchers navigate issues of scientific accuracy, institutional inequality, and research utility in their pursuit of even basic cost estimates. We provide an example of how we confronted these issues when estimating the costs of a large-scale community-based intervention. Principles for valuing community members’ time and conducting economic evaluations of community programs are discussed.

AB - Restricted public budgets and increasing efforts to link the impact of community interventions to public savings have increased the use of economic evaluation. While this type of evaluation can be important for program planning, it also raises important ethical issues about how we value the time of local stakeholders who support community interventions. In particular, researchers navigate issues of scientific accuracy, institutional inequality, and research utility in their pursuit of even basic cost estimates. We provide an example of how we confronted these issues when estimating the costs of a large-scale community-based intervention. Principles for valuing community members’ time and conducting economic evaluations of community programs are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034596661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034596661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajcp.12200

DO - 10.1002/ajcp.12200

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 309

EP - 315

JO - American Journal of Community Psychology

JF - American Journal of Community Psychology

SN - 0091-0562

IS - 3-4

ER -