Variable effect of larval stage on the efficacy of insecticides against Listronotus maculicollis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) populations with different levels of pyrethroid resistance

Albrecht M. Koppenhöfer, Benjamin A. McGraw, Olga S. Kostromytska, Shaohui Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The annual bluegrass weevil, Listronotus maculicollis Kirby, is a major insect pest of golf course turf in eastern North America. The weevil has been primarily managed with insecticides with applications targeting adults or the first through third instar larvae. It is not understood how effective larvicides are when significant numbers of fourth or even fifths instars are present. In greenhouse and field experiments we exposed larval populations of the weevil to the insecticides cyantraniliprole, spinosad, indoxacarb, and trichlorfon when the larval instar average was 2.5, 3.2, and 4.0, respectively (henceforth called L2.5, L3.2, and L4.0 timing, respectively). Greenhouse and field experiments showed similar trends in insecticide effectiveness. At the L2.5 timing, cyantraniliprole was the most effective and trichlorfon the least effective insecticide. At the L3.2 timing, all insecticides provide similar control levels. At the L4.0 timing, spinosad was more effective than the rest. Consequently, spinosad efficacy did not differ between application timings, cyantraniliprole and indoxacarb were more effective at the L2.5 and L3.2 than at the L4.0 timing, and trichlorfon was more effective at the L3.2 than the L2.5 and L4.0 timings. Our observations show that these insecticides remain effective until the larval instar average is approximately 3.2, giving applicators more time to accurately determine the need for insecticide applications which can lead to reduced insecticide use and thereby alleviate pressure for resistance development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number104888
JournalCrop Protection
Volume125
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Fingerprint

Listronotus
pyrethrins
Curculionidae
insecticides
Coleoptera
trichlorfon
spinosad
instars
indoxacarb
greenhouses
larvicides
Poa annua
golf courses
application timing
lawns and turf
insect pests
pesticide application

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

@article{28c3ca6d711e4747bf50a5d5f21c456e,
title = "Variable effect of larval stage on the efficacy of insecticides against Listronotus maculicollis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) populations with different levels of pyrethroid resistance",
abstract = "The annual bluegrass weevil, Listronotus maculicollis Kirby, is a major insect pest of golf course turf in eastern North America. The weevil has been primarily managed with insecticides with applications targeting adults or the first through third instar larvae. It is not understood how effective larvicides are when significant numbers of fourth or even fifths instars are present. In greenhouse and field experiments we exposed larval populations of the weevil to the insecticides cyantraniliprole, spinosad, indoxacarb, and trichlorfon when the larval instar average was 2.5, 3.2, and 4.0, respectively (henceforth called L2.5, L3.2, and L4.0 timing, respectively). Greenhouse and field experiments showed similar trends in insecticide effectiveness. At the L2.5 timing, cyantraniliprole was the most effective and trichlorfon the least effective insecticide. At the L3.2 timing, all insecticides provide similar control levels. At the L4.0 timing, spinosad was more effective than the rest. Consequently, spinosad efficacy did not differ between application timings, cyantraniliprole and indoxacarb were more effective at the L2.5 and L3.2 than at the L4.0 timing, and trichlorfon was more effective at the L3.2 than the L2.5 and L4.0 timings. Our observations show that these insecticides remain effective until the larval instar average is approximately 3.2, giving applicators more time to accurately determine the need for insecticide applications which can lead to reduced insecticide use and thereby alleviate pressure for resistance development.",
author = "Koppenh{\"o}fer, {Albrecht M.} and McGraw, {Benjamin A.} and Kostromytska, {Olga S.} and Shaohui Wu",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cropro.2019.104888",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
journal = "Crop Protection",
issn = "0261-2194",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Variable effect of larval stage on the efficacy of insecticides against Listronotus maculicollis (Coleoptera : Curculionidae) populations with different levels of pyrethroid resistance. / Koppenhöfer, Albrecht M.; McGraw, Benjamin A.; Kostromytska, Olga S.; Wu, Shaohui.

In: Crop Protection, Vol. 125, 104888, 01.11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variable effect of larval stage on the efficacy of insecticides against Listronotus maculicollis (Coleoptera

T2 - Curculionidae) populations with different levels of pyrethroid resistance

AU - Koppenhöfer, Albrecht M.

AU - McGraw, Benjamin A.

AU - Kostromytska, Olga S.

AU - Wu, Shaohui

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - The annual bluegrass weevil, Listronotus maculicollis Kirby, is a major insect pest of golf course turf in eastern North America. The weevil has been primarily managed with insecticides with applications targeting adults or the first through third instar larvae. It is not understood how effective larvicides are when significant numbers of fourth or even fifths instars are present. In greenhouse and field experiments we exposed larval populations of the weevil to the insecticides cyantraniliprole, spinosad, indoxacarb, and trichlorfon when the larval instar average was 2.5, 3.2, and 4.0, respectively (henceforth called L2.5, L3.2, and L4.0 timing, respectively). Greenhouse and field experiments showed similar trends in insecticide effectiveness. At the L2.5 timing, cyantraniliprole was the most effective and trichlorfon the least effective insecticide. At the L3.2 timing, all insecticides provide similar control levels. At the L4.0 timing, spinosad was more effective than the rest. Consequently, spinosad efficacy did not differ between application timings, cyantraniliprole and indoxacarb were more effective at the L2.5 and L3.2 than at the L4.0 timing, and trichlorfon was more effective at the L3.2 than the L2.5 and L4.0 timings. Our observations show that these insecticides remain effective until the larval instar average is approximately 3.2, giving applicators more time to accurately determine the need for insecticide applications which can lead to reduced insecticide use and thereby alleviate pressure for resistance development.

AB - The annual bluegrass weevil, Listronotus maculicollis Kirby, is a major insect pest of golf course turf in eastern North America. The weevil has been primarily managed with insecticides with applications targeting adults or the first through third instar larvae. It is not understood how effective larvicides are when significant numbers of fourth or even fifths instars are present. In greenhouse and field experiments we exposed larval populations of the weevil to the insecticides cyantraniliprole, spinosad, indoxacarb, and trichlorfon when the larval instar average was 2.5, 3.2, and 4.0, respectively (henceforth called L2.5, L3.2, and L4.0 timing, respectively). Greenhouse and field experiments showed similar trends in insecticide effectiveness. At the L2.5 timing, cyantraniliprole was the most effective and trichlorfon the least effective insecticide. At the L3.2 timing, all insecticides provide similar control levels. At the L4.0 timing, spinosad was more effective than the rest. Consequently, spinosad efficacy did not differ between application timings, cyantraniliprole and indoxacarb were more effective at the L2.5 and L3.2 than at the L4.0 timing, and trichlorfon was more effective at the L3.2 than the L2.5 and L4.0 timings. Our observations show that these insecticides remain effective until the larval instar average is approximately 3.2, giving applicators more time to accurately determine the need for insecticide applications which can lead to reduced insecticide use and thereby alleviate pressure for resistance development.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069674583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069674583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.104888

DO - 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.104888

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069674583

VL - 125

JO - Crop Protection

JF - Crop Protection

SN - 0261-2194

M1 - 104888

ER -