Variance in the interpretation of cervical biopsy specimens obtained for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We sought to determine whether the variability in dysplasia rates in cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) reflects variability in interpretation of cervical biopsy specimens. In phase 1, 124 biopsy specimens obtained because of a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS were reviewed independently by 5 experienced pathologists. Diagnostic choices were normal, squamous metaplasia, reactive, indeterminate, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). The rate of dysplasia ranged from 23% to 51%. All pathologists agreed in 28% of cases. In 52% of cases, the diagnoses ranged from benign to dysplasia. The overall interobserver agreement was poor. In phase 2, 60 cervical biopsy specimens (21 obtained for ASCUS, 22 for LSIL, and 17 for HSIL) were evaluated using the same diagnostic choices. Agreement was better in biopsies performed for HSIL and LSIL compared to those for ASCUS. Intraobserver reproducibility in the interpretation of biopsies performed for ASCUS ranged from poor to excellent. We conclude that variability in the interpretation of biopsy specimens plays an important role in the differences in rates of dysplasia reported for the follow-up of ASCUS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)735-740
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican journal of clinical pathology
Volume114
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2000

Fingerprint

Biopsy
Metaplasia
Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix
Pathologists

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

@article{a086bcaaa1a04f57b0981db8e9bb70cc,
title = "Variance in the interpretation of cervical biopsy specimens obtained for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance",
abstract = "We sought to determine whether the variability in dysplasia rates in cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) reflects variability in interpretation of cervical biopsy specimens. In phase 1, 124 biopsy specimens obtained because of a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS were reviewed independently by 5 experienced pathologists. Diagnostic choices were normal, squamous metaplasia, reactive, indeterminate, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). The rate of dysplasia ranged from 23{\%} to 51{\%}. All pathologists agreed in 28{\%} of cases. In 52{\%} of cases, the diagnoses ranged from benign to dysplasia. The overall interobserver agreement was poor. In phase 2, 60 cervical biopsy specimens (21 obtained for ASCUS, 22 for LSIL, and 17 for HSIL) were evaluated using the same diagnostic choices. Agreement was better in biopsies performed for HSIL and LSIL compared to those for ASCUS. Intraobserver reproducibility in the interpretation of biopsies performed for ASCUS ranged from poor to excellent. We conclude that variability in the interpretation of biopsy specimens plays an important role in the differences in rates of dysplasia reported for the follow-up of ASCUS.",
author = "Grenko, {R. T.} and Catherine Abendroth and Elizabeth Frauenhoffer and Francesca Ruggiero and Zaino, {R. J.}",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1309/K7C9-X5P0-001B-2HK5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "114",
pages = "735--740",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Pathology",
issn = "0002-9173",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Pathologists",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variance in the interpretation of cervical biopsy specimens obtained for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance

AU - Grenko, R. T.

AU - Abendroth, Catherine

AU - Frauenhoffer, Elizabeth

AU - Ruggiero, Francesca

AU - Zaino, R. J.

PY - 2000/12/1

Y1 - 2000/12/1

N2 - We sought to determine whether the variability in dysplasia rates in cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) reflects variability in interpretation of cervical biopsy specimens. In phase 1, 124 biopsy specimens obtained because of a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS were reviewed independently by 5 experienced pathologists. Diagnostic choices were normal, squamous metaplasia, reactive, indeterminate, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). The rate of dysplasia ranged from 23% to 51%. All pathologists agreed in 28% of cases. In 52% of cases, the diagnoses ranged from benign to dysplasia. The overall interobserver agreement was poor. In phase 2, 60 cervical biopsy specimens (21 obtained for ASCUS, 22 for LSIL, and 17 for HSIL) were evaluated using the same diagnostic choices. Agreement was better in biopsies performed for HSIL and LSIL compared to those for ASCUS. Intraobserver reproducibility in the interpretation of biopsies performed for ASCUS ranged from poor to excellent. We conclude that variability in the interpretation of biopsy specimens plays an important role in the differences in rates of dysplasia reported for the follow-up of ASCUS.

AB - We sought to determine whether the variability in dysplasia rates in cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) reflects variability in interpretation of cervical biopsy specimens. In phase 1, 124 biopsy specimens obtained because of a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS were reviewed independently by 5 experienced pathologists. Diagnostic choices were normal, squamous metaplasia, reactive, indeterminate, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). The rate of dysplasia ranged from 23% to 51%. All pathologists agreed in 28% of cases. In 52% of cases, the diagnoses ranged from benign to dysplasia. The overall interobserver agreement was poor. In phase 2, 60 cervical biopsy specimens (21 obtained for ASCUS, 22 for LSIL, and 17 for HSIL) were evaluated using the same diagnostic choices. Agreement was better in biopsies performed for HSIL and LSIL compared to those for ASCUS. Intraobserver reproducibility in the interpretation of biopsies performed for ASCUS ranged from poor to excellent. We conclude that variability in the interpretation of biopsy specimens plays an important role in the differences in rates of dysplasia reported for the follow-up of ASCUS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034523613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034523613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1309/K7C9-X5P0-001B-2HK5

DO - 10.1309/K7C9-X5P0-001B-2HK5

M3 - Article

C2 - 11068547

AN - SCOPUS:0034523613

VL - 114

SP - 735

EP - 740

JO - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

SN - 0002-9173

IS - 5

ER -