Variation in low-frequency estimates of sound levels based on different units of analysis

Russell S. Hawkins, Jennifer L. Miksis-Olds, Chad Mahlon Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The measurement and analysis of underwater sound is a complicated process because of the variable durations of contributing sources and constantly changing water column dynamics. Because the ambient sound distribution does not always follow a Gaussian structure and may be nonstationary in time, analysis over an extended period is required to accurately characterize the data. Utilizing recordings from the Indian Ocean, the temporal variation in ambient sound including transient signals was examined using multiple processing window lengths and subsampling intervals. Results illustrate the degree of uncertainty in sound levels based on different units of analysis. The average difference between sound level estimates in the 10-30 Hz band due to subsampling was 2 dB and as high as 4 dB. The difference in the full band (5-110 Hz) was as high as 6 dB. Longer averaging windows (200 vs 60 s) resulted in larger variations over different subsampling intervals. This work demonstrates how sampling protocols within a single dataset can influence results and acknowledges that comparative studies at the same location but with different sampling protocols can be substantial if signal processing parameters are not statistically accounted for to confirm interpretation of results and observed trends.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)705-711
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume135
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 20 2014

Fingerprint

low frequencies
acoustics
estimates
sampling
intervals
underwater acoustics
Indian Ocean
signal processing
recording
trends
Sound
water
Subsampling
Sampling

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

@article{49699586479f4a2ab4a8bc6fae514019,
title = "Variation in low-frequency estimates of sound levels based on different units of analysis",
abstract = "The measurement and analysis of underwater sound is a complicated process because of the variable durations of contributing sources and constantly changing water column dynamics. Because the ambient sound distribution does not always follow a Gaussian structure and may be nonstationary in time, analysis over an extended period is required to accurately characterize the data. Utilizing recordings from the Indian Ocean, the temporal variation in ambient sound including transient signals was examined using multiple processing window lengths and subsampling intervals. Results illustrate the degree of uncertainty in sound levels based on different units of analysis. The average difference between sound level estimates in the 10-30 Hz band due to subsampling was 2 dB and as high as 4 dB. The difference in the full band (5-110 Hz) was as high as 6 dB. Longer averaging windows (200 vs 60 s) resulted in larger variations over different subsampling intervals. This work demonstrates how sampling protocols within a single dataset can influence results and acknowledges that comparative studies at the same location but with different sampling protocols can be substantial if signal processing parameters are not statistically accounted for to confirm interpretation of results and observed trends.",
author = "Hawkins, {Russell S.} and Miksis-Olds, {Jennifer L.} and Smith, {Chad Mahlon}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1121/1.4861252",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "135",
pages = "705--711",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "2",

}

Variation in low-frequency estimates of sound levels based on different units of analysis. / Hawkins, Russell S.; Miksis-Olds, Jennifer L.; Smith, Chad Mahlon.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 135, No. 2, 20.03.2014, p. 705-711.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation in low-frequency estimates of sound levels based on different units of analysis

AU - Hawkins, Russell S.

AU - Miksis-Olds, Jennifer L.

AU - Smith, Chad Mahlon

PY - 2014/3/20

Y1 - 2014/3/20

N2 - The measurement and analysis of underwater sound is a complicated process because of the variable durations of contributing sources and constantly changing water column dynamics. Because the ambient sound distribution does not always follow a Gaussian structure and may be nonstationary in time, analysis over an extended period is required to accurately characterize the data. Utilizing recordings from the Indian Ocean, the temporal variation in ambient sound including transient signals was examined using multiple processing window lengths and subsampling intervals. Results illustrate the degree of uncertainty in sound levels based on different units of analysis. The average difference between sound level estimates in the 10-30 Hz band due to subsampling was 2 dB and as high as 4 dB. The difference in the full band (5-110 Hz) was as high as 6 dB. Longer averaging windows (200 vs 60 s) resulted in larger variations over different subsampling intervals. This work demonstrates how sampling protocols within a single dataset can influence results and acknowledges that comparative studies at the same location but with different sampling protocols can be substantial if signal processing parameters are not statistically accounted for to confirm interpretation of results and observed trends.

AB - The measurement and analysis of underwater sound is a complicated process because of the variable durations of contributing sources and constantly changing water column dynamics. Because the ambient sound distribution does not always follow a Gaussian structure and may be nonstationary in time, analysis over an extended period is required to accurately characterize the data. Utilizing recordings from the Indian Ocean, the temporal variation in ambient sound including transient signals was examined using multiple processing window lengths and subsampling intervals. Results illustrate the degree of uncertainty in sound levels based on different units of analysis. The average difference between sound level estimates in the 10-30 Hz band due to subsampling was 2 dB and as high as 4 dB. The difference in the full band (5-110 Hz) was as high as 6 dB. Longer averaging windows (200 vs 60 s) resulted in larger variations over different subsampling intervals. This work demonstrates how sampling protocols within a single dataset can influence results and acknowledges that comparative studies at the same location but with different sampling protocols can be substantial if signal processing parameters are not statistically accounted for to confirm interpretation of results and observed trends.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900643401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900643401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.4861252

DO - 10.1121/1.4861252

M3 - Article

VL - 135

SP - 705

EP - 711

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 2

ER -