Vicarious deliberation: How the oregon citizens' initiative review influenced deliberation in mass elections

John Gastil, Robert Richards, Katherine Knobloch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

The state of Oregon established the Citizens' Initiative Review (CIR) to improve the quality of public deliberation during direct elections. To better understand how a deliberative "mini-public" can influence electoral deliberation on complex ballot issues, we analyzed the 2010 CIR's Citizens' Statements as well as how the Oregon electorate used them. Analysis of this case shows the political feasibility of intensive deliberation and the Oregon public's appreciation of having access to neutral information developed by peers. This study also examines how the CIR Statements were written, their distinctive topical coverage relative to conventional voting guides, and what they left out of their policy analyses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)62-89
Number of pages28
JournalInternational Journal of Communication
Volume8
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 21 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Vicarious deliberation: How the oregon citizens' initiative review influenced deliberation in mass elections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this