TY - JOUR
T1 - Victims or intruders? Refugee portrayals in the news in Turkey, Bulgaria and the UK
AU - Ozdora-Aksak, Emel
AU - Connolly-Ahern, Colleen
AU - Dimitrova, Daniela
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a Page Legacy Scholar Grant from the Arthur W. Page Center at the Bellisario College of Communications at Penn State University. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Pennsylvania State University.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - News shapes audiences’ views of people and events beyond their immediate physical environment. Since the mass migration of refugees from Syria represents one of the worst humanitarian crises in modern history, its news coverage necessarily shaped the way global audiences understood the crisis. This qualitative study employs critical discourse analysis (CDA), specifically Van Leeuwen’s Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis (2008) as a social practice approach, to reveal and compare the discursive strategies used in the print media coverage of the Syrian refugees in three European countries: Turkey, Bulgaria and the UK. The findings show significant differences in the discourse used to describe the refugees and different approaches in terms of contextualization, spaces and actions depicted in the media coverage in each country. The study reveals the ongoing dialogue between journalistic practice and political decision making in three countries impacted to varying extents by the ongoing crisis.
AB - News shapes audiences’ views of people and events beyond their immediate physical environment. Since the mass migration of refugees from Syria represents one of the worst humanitarian crises in modern history, its news coverage necessarily shaped the way global audiences understood the crisis. This qualitative study employs critical discourse analysis (CDA), specifically Van Leeuwen’s Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis (2008) as a social practice approach, to reveal and compare the discursive strategies used in the print media coverage of the Syrian refugees in three European countries: Turkey, Bulgaria and the UK. The findings show significant differences in the discourse used to describe the refugees and different approaches in terms of contextualization, spaces and actions depicted in the media coverage in each country. The study reveals the ongoing dialogue between journalistic practice and political decision making in three countries impacted to varying extents by the ongoing crisis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114721271&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85114721271&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/17506352211013482
DO - 10.1177/17506352211013482
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114721271
VL - 14
SP - 282
EP - 302
JO - Media, War and Conflict
JF - Media, War and Conflict
SN - 1750-6352
IS - 3
ER -