Video camcorders and civil inattention

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the introduction of video camcorders in 1983, the news media have reported controversial cases in which the devices were used to violate the audiovisual privacy of others. To explain such counternormative videotaping behavior, two studies tested the prediction that camcorders themselves can facilitate viewing behavior when civil inattention should be exercised. When asked to imagine videotaping or watching a couple (Study 1), participants approved more of videotaping than watching, despite the couple's need for privacy. When asked to actually videotape or watch a couple (Study 2), participants were more comfortable videotaping than watching. These findings support the prediction and replicate previous research showing that some consumer technologies can facilitate behavior that violates interpersonal norms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)805-816
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Social Behavior and Personality
Volume11
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 1996

Fingerprint

Privacy
Videotape Recording
Technology
Equipment and Supplies
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{fa14be3d540a47b0aa7500c54ab80147,
title = "Video camcorders and civil inattention",
abstract = "Since the introduction of video camcorders in 1983, the news media have reported controversial cases in which the devices were used to violate the audiovisual privacy of others. To explain such counternormative videotaping behavior, two studies tested the prediction that camcorders themselves can facilitate viewing behavior when civil inattention should be exercised. When asked to imagine videotaping or watching a couple (Study 1), participants approved more of videotaping than watching, despite the couple's need for privacy. When asked to actually videotape or watch a couple (Study 2), participants were more comfortable videotaping than watching. These findings support the prediction and replicate previous research showing that some consumer technologies can facilitate behavior that violates interpersonal norms.",
author = "Crabb, {Peter Brown}",
year = "1996",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "805--816",
journal = "Journal of Social Behavior and Personality",
issn = "0886-1641",
publisher = "University of Hartford",
number = "4",

}

Video camcorders and civil inattention. / Crabb, Peter Brown.

In: Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 11, No. 4, 01.12.1996, p. 805-816.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Video camcorders and civil inattention

AU - Crabb, Peter Brown

PY - 1996/12/1

Y1 - 1996/12/1

N2 - Since the introduction of video camcorders in 1983, the news media have reported controversial cases in which the devices were used to violate the audiovisual privacy of others. To explain such counternormative videotaping behavior, two studies tested the prediction that camcorders themselves can facilitate viewing behavior when civil inattention should be exercised. When asked to imagine videotaping or watching a couple (Study 1), participants approved more of videotaping than watching, despite the couple's need for privacy. When asked to actually videotape or watch a couple (Study 2), participants were more comfortable videotaping than watching. These findings support the prediction and replicate previous research showing that some consumer technologies can facilitate behavior that violates interpersonal norms.

AB - Since the introduction of video camcorders in 1983, the news media have reported controversial cases in which the devices were used to violate the audiovisual privacy of others. To explain such counternormative videotaping behavior, two studies tested the prediction that camcorders themselves can facilitate viewing behavior when civil inattention should be exercised. When asked to imagine videotaping or watching a couple (Study 1), participants approved more of videotaping than watching, despite the couple's need for privacy. When asked to actually videotape or watch a couple (Study 2), participants were more comfortable videotaping than watching. These findings support the prediction and replicate previous research showing that some consumer technologies can facilitate behavior that violates interpersonal norms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030299715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030299715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 805

EP - 816

JO - Journal of Social Behavior and Personality

JF - Journal of Social Behavior and Personality

SN - 0886-1641

IS - 4

ER -