Viewpoint alignment and response conflict during spatial judgment

Myeong Ho Sohn, Richard Alan Carlson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spatial judgment (e.g., identifying the relative location, such as left or right, of a target) from a reference point becomes more difficult with increasing disparity between the relevant allocentric viewpoint and the observer-centered viewpoint. The viewpoint alignment hypothesis suggests that this misalignment effect is due to a realignment process that reconciles two viewpoints, implying that providing an advance cue for a viewpoint should facilitate the subsequent judgment. We examined whether advance viewpoint information can reduce the misalignment effect and whether the misalignment effect reflects response conflict, as well as realignment of viewpoints. In Experiment 1, the misalignment effect decreased with advance viewpoint information, suggesting that the misalignment effect indeed reflects viewpoint realignment. In Experiment 2, the misalignment effect was greater with spatial response codes that might conflict with the spatially arranged response keys than with arbitrary responses with no such conflict. These results suggest that the misalignment effect may arise from both viewpoint realignment and response conflicts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)907-916
Number of pages10
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Cues
Conflict (Psychology)
Alignment
Realignment
Experiment
Observer

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{6cb360aed5724d378bae11bd71936b69,
title = "Viewpoint alignment and response conflict during spatial judgment",
abstract = "Spatial judgment (e.g., identifying the relative location, such as left or right, of a target) from a reference point becomes more difficult with increasing disparity between the relevant allocentric viewpoint and the observer-centered viewpoint. The viewpoint alignment hypothesis suggests that this misalignment effect is due to a realignment process that reconciles two viewpoints, implying that providing an advance cue for a viewpoint should facilitate the subsequent judgment. We examined whether advance viewpoint information can reduce the misalignment effect and whether the misalignment effect reflects response conflict, as well as realignment of viewpoints. In Experiment 1, the misalignment effect decreased with advance viewpoint information, suggesting that the misalignment effect indeed reflects viewpoint realignment. In Experiment 2, the misalignment effect was greater with spatial response codes that might conflict with the spatially arranged response keys than with arbitrary responses with no such conflict. These results suggest that the misalignment effect may arise from both viewpoint realignment and response conflicts.",
author = "Sohn, {Myeong Ho} and Carlson, {Richard Alan}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03196551",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "907--916",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

Viewpoint alignment and response conflict during spatial judgment. / Sohn, Myeong Ho; Carlson, Richard Alan.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 10, No. 4, 01.01.2003, p. 907-916.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Viewpoint alignment and response conflict during spatial judgment

AU - Sohn, Myeong Ho

AU - Carlson, Richard Alan

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Spatial judgment (e.g., identifying the relative location, such as left or right, of a target) from a reference point becomes more difficult with increasing disparity between the relevant allocentric viewpoint and the observer-centered viewpoint. The viewpoint alignment hypothesis suggests that this misalignment effect is due to a realignment process that reconciles two viewpoints, implying that providing an advance cue for a viewpoint should facilitate the subsequent judgment. We examined whether advance viewpoint information can reduce the misalignment effect and whether the misalignment effect reflects response conflict, as well as realignment of viewpoints. In Experiment 1, the misalignment effect decreased with advance viewpoint information, suggesting that the misalignment effect indeed reflects viewpoint realignment. In Experiment 2, the misalignment effect was greater with spatial response codes that might conflict with the spatially arranged response keys than with arbitrary responses with no such conflict. These results suggest that the misalignment effect may arise from both viewpoint realignment and response conflicts.

AB - Spatial judgment (e.g., identifying the relative location, such as left or right, of a target) from a reference point becomes more difficult with increasing disparity between the relevant allocentric viewpoint and the observer-centered viewpoint. The viewpoint alignment hypothesis suggests that this misalignment effect is due to a realignment process that reconciles two viewpoints, implying that providing an advance cue for a viewpoint should facilitate the subsequent judgment. We examined whether advance viewpoint information can reduce the misalignment effect and whether the misalignment effect reflects response conflict, as well as realignment of viewpoints. In Experiment 1, the misalignment effect decreased with advance viewpoint information, suggesting that the misalignment effect indeed reflects viewpoint realignment. In Experiment 2, the misalignment effect was greater with spatial response codes that might conflict with the spatially arranged response keys than with arbitrary responses with no such conflict. These results suggest that the misalignment effect may arise from both viewpoint realignment and response conflicts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842787596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842787596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03196551

DO - 10.3758/BF03196551

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15000538

AN - SCOPUS:1842787596

VL - 10

SP - 907

EP - 916

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 4

ER -