14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Awareness and use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) has increased significantly in the past five years, but little is known about the experiences, satisfaction, opinions and preferences of e-cigs users. Method: 1177 participants completed an online survey about their electronic cigarette preferences, of which 200 were randomly selected for analysis. The data were analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: Participants found the design, the ability to customize, and the quality of vapour to be the most important characteristics of the device. Participants thought the most positive aspects of e-cig use were help to quit smoking, improved overall health, and reduced cost. The negative aspects associated with its use were mainly related to side effects, such as dry mouth. When asked to explain how e-cigs were used differently than cigarettes, participants reported puffing more regularly, but taking fewer puffs per session. Conclusions: Experienced e-cig users stated that initiating e-cig use helped them to quit or reduce their conventional smoking, which they believe reduced their health risks. In comparison to cigarette smoking, e-cig users reported using their e-cig more times per day, but with fewer puffs at each use time. Users acknowledged that more research is needed to understand the safety and long-term effects of its use. They mentioned dry mouth as a common side effect and common problems with reliability of e-cigs. Understanding these views may help health professionals to assess and assist e-cig users, and in the future, may help regulators to improve quality and reduce risks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)80-88
Number of pages9
JournalAddiction Research and Theory
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2016

Fingerprint

Smoking
Mouth
Electronic Cigarettes
Aptitude
Health
Tobacco Products
Health Care Costs
Safety
Equipment and Supplies
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{bf8f6b37235443a796f410035e60dea7,
title = "Views of experienced electronic cigarette users",
abstract = "Background: Awareness and use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) has increased significantly in the past five years, but little is known about the experiences, satisfaction, opinions and preferences of e-cigs users. Method: 1177 participants completed an online survey about their electronic cigarette preferences, of which 200 were randomly selected for analysis. The data were analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: Participants found the design, the ability to customize, and the quality of vapour to be the most important characteristics of the device. Participants thought the most positive aspects of e-cig use were help to quit smoking, improved overall health, and reduced cost. The negative aspects associated with its use were mainly related to side effects, such as dry mouth. When asked to explain how e-cigs were used differently than cigarettes, participants reported puffing more regularly, but taking fewer puffs per session. Conclusions: Experienced e-cig users stated that initiating e-cig use helped them to quit or reduce their conventional smoking, which they believe reduced their health risks. In comparison to cigarette smoking, e-cig users reported using their e-cig more times per day, but with fewer puffs at each use time. Users acknowledged that more research is needed to understand the safety and long-term effects of its use. They mentioned dry mouth as a common side effect and common problems with reliability of e-cigs. Understanding these views may help health professionals to assess and assist e-cig users, and in the future, may help regulators to improve quality and reduce risks.",
author = "Raman Baweja and Katherine Curci and Jessica Yingst and Susan Veldheer and Shari Hrabovsky and Stephen Wilson and Nichols, {Travis T.} and Thomas Eissenberg and Jonathan Foulds",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.3109/16066359.2015.1077947",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "80--88",
journal = "Addiction Research and Theory",
issn = "1606-6359",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

Views of experienced electronic cigarette users. / Baweja, Raman; Curci, Katherine; Yingst, Jessica; Veldheer, Susan; Hrabovsky, Shari; Wilson, Stephen; Nichols, Travis T.; Eissenberg, Thomas; Foulds, Jonathan.

In: Addiction Research and Theory, Vol. 24, No. 1, 02.01.2016, p. 80-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Views of experienced electronic cigarette users

AU - Baweja, Raman

AU - Curci, Katherine

AU - Yingst, Jessica

AU - Veldheer, Susan

AU - Hrabovsky, Shari

AU - Wilson, Stephen

AU - Nichols, Travis T.

AU - Eissenberg, Thomas

AU - Foulds, Jonathan

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

N2 - Background: Awareness and use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) has increased significantly in the past five years, but little is known about the experiences, satisfaction, opinions and preferences of e-cigs users. Method: 1177 participants completed an online survey about their electronic cigarette preferences, of which 200 were randomly selected for analysis. The data were analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: Participants found the design, the ability to customize, and the quality of vapour to be the most important characteristics of the device. Participants thought the most positive aspects of e-cig use were help to quit smoking, improved overall health, and reduced cost. The negative aspects associated with its use were mainly related to side effects, such as dry mouth. When asked to explain how e-cigs were used differently than cigarettes, participants reported puffing more regularly, but taking fewer puffs per session. Conclusions: Experienced e-cig users stated that initiating e-cig use helped them to quit or reduce their conventional smoking, which they believe reduced their health risks. In comparison to cigarette smoking, e-cig users reported using their e-cig more times per day, but with fewer puffs at each use time. Users acknowledged that more research is needed to understand the safety and long-term effects of its use. They mentioned dry mouth as a common side effect and common problems with reliability of e-cigs. Understanding these views may help health professionals to assess and assist e-cig users, and in the future, may help regulators to improve quality and reduce risks.

AB - Background: Awareness and use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) has increased significantly in the past five years, but little is known about the experiences, satisfaction, opinions and preferences of e-cigs users. Method: 1177 participants completed an online survey about their electronic cigarette preferences, of which 200 were randomly selected for analysis. The data were analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: Participants found the design, the ability to customize, and the quality of vapour to be the most important characteristics of the device. Participants thought the most positive aspects of e-cig use were help to quit smoking, improved overall health, and reduced cost. The negative aspects associated with its use were mainly related to side effects, such as dry mouth. When asked to explain how e-cigs were used differently than cigarettes, participants reported puffing more regularly, but taking fewer puffs per session. Conclusions: Experienced e-cig users stated that initiating e-cig use helped them to quit or reduce their conventional smoking, which they believe reduced their health risks. In comparison to cigarette smoking, e-cig users reported using their e-cig more times per day, but with fewer puffs at each use time. Users acknowledged that more research is needed to understand the safety and long-term effects of its use. They mentioned dry mouth as a common side effect and common problems with reliability of e-cigs. Understanding these views may help health professionals to assess and assist e-cig users, and in the future, may help regulators to improve quality and reduce risks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955212247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955212247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/16066359.2015.1077947

DO - 10.3109/16066359.2015.1077947

M3 - Review article

VL - 24

SP - 80

EP - 88

JO - Addiction Research and Theory

JF - Addiction Research and Theory

SN - 1606-6359

IS - 1

ER -