Voices of welfare reform: Bureaucratic rationality versus the perceptions of welfare participants

Ann Rachel Tickamyer; Debra A. Henderson; Julie Anne White; Barry L. Tadlock

doi:10.1177/08861090022093921

Voices of welfare reform: Bureaucratic rationality versus the perceptions of welfare participants

Ann Rachel Tickamyer, Debra A. Henderson, Julie Anne White, Barry L. Tadlock

Agricultural Economics, Sociology and Education

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article compares the assumptions of welfare reform with the way the program is actually implemented to show the underlying contradictions in the way policy is politically justified and implemented. The results of focus group discussions with women on welfare in four rural Appalachian Ohio counties demonstrate the disparities between the top-down goals of welfare policy and the bottom-up perceptions of their outcomes.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	173-192
Number of pages	20
Journal	Affilia - Journal of Women and Social Work
Volume	15
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/08861090022093921
State	Published - Jan 1 2000

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Gender Studies
Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1177/08861090022093921

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Voices of welfare reform: Bureaucratic rationality versus the perceptions of welfare participants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{1ba52c27aa674522aae8ff0ab9ce8cc9,

title = "Voices of welfare reform: Bureaucratic rationality versus the perceptions of welfare participants",

abstract = "This article compares the assumptions of welfare reform with the way the program is actually implemented to show the underlying contradictions in the way policy is politically justified and implemented. The results of focus group discussions with women on welfare in four rural Appalachian Ohio counties demonstrate the disparities between the top-down goals of welfare policy and the bottom-up perceptions of their outcomes.",

author = "Tickamyer, {Ann Rachel} and Henderson, {Debra A.} and White, {Julie Anne} and Tadlock, {Barry L.}",

year = "2000",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/08861090022093921",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "15",

pages = "173--192",

journal = "Affilia - Journal of Women and Social Work",

issn = "0886-1099",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voices of welfare reform

T2 - Bureaucratic rationality versus the perceptions of welfare participants

AU - Tickamyer, Ann Rachel

AU - Henderson, Debra A.

AU - White, Julie Anne

AU - Tadlock, Barry L.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - This article compares the assumptions of welfare reform with the way the program is actually implemented to show the underlying contradictions in the way policy is politically justified and implemented. The results of focus group discussions with women on welfare in four rural Appalachian Ohio counties demonstrate the disparities between the top-down goals of welfare policy and the bottom-up perceptions of their outcomes.

AB - This article compares the assumptions of welfare reform with the way the program is actually implemented to show the underlying contradictions in the way policy is politically justified and implemented. The results of focus group discussions with women on welfare in four rural Appalachian Ohio counties demonstrate the disparities between the top-down goals of welfare policy and the bottom-up perceptions of their outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034195696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034195696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/08861090022093921

DO - 10.1177/08861090022093921

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034195696

VL - 15

SP - 173

EP - 192

JO - Affilia - Journal of Women and Social Work

JF - Affilia - Journal of Women and Social Work

SN - 0886-1099

IS - 2

ER -