Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives and shareholder wealth

Karen Fisher-Vanden, Karin S. Thorburn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Researchers debate whether environmental investments reduce firm value or actually improve financial performance. We provide some compelling evidence on shareholder wealth effects of membership in voluntary environmental programs (VEPs). Companies announcing membership in EPA's Climate Leaders, a program targeting reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, experience significantly negative abnormal stock returns. The price decline is larger in firms with poor corporate governance structures, and for high market-to-book (i.e., high growth) firms. However, firms joining Ceres, a program involving more general environmental commitments, have insignificant announcement returns, as do portfolios of industry rivals. Overall, corporate commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions appear to conflict with firm value maximization. This has important implications for policies that rely on voluntary initiatives to address climate change. Further, we find that firms facing climate-related shareholder resolutions or firms with weak corporate governance standards - giving managers the discretion to make such voluntary environmentally responsible investment decisions - are more likely to join Climate Leaders; decisions that may result in lower firm value.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)430-445
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Environmental Economics and Management
Volume62
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2011

Fingerprint

climate
greenhouse gas
Shareholder wealth
firm
targeting
Firm value
Climate
climate change
market
Corporate governance
Greenhouse gas emissions
industry
Announcement returns
Wealth effect
Book-to-market
Voluntary initiatives
Environmental investment
Industry
Targeting
High-growth firms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{1f09d380c80c4f6bb02689cd12c4ef8b,
title = "Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives and shareholder wealth",
abstract = "Researchers debate whether environmental investments reduce firm value or actually improve financial performance. We provide some compelling evidence on shareholder wealth effects of membership in voluntary environmental programs (VEPs). Companies announcing membership in EPA's Climate Leaders, a program targeting reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, experience significantly negative abnormal stock returns. The price decline is larger in firms with poor corporate governance structures, and for high market-to-book (i.e., high growth) firms. However, firms joining Ceres, a program involving more general environmental commitments, have insignificant announcement returns, as do portfolios of industry rivals. Overall, corporate commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions appear to conflict with firm value maximization. This has important implications for policies that rely on voluntary initiatives to address climate change. Further, we find that firms facing climate-related shareholder resolutions or firms with weak corporate governance standards - giving managers the discretion to make such voluntary environmentally responsible investment decisions - are more likely to join Climate Leaders; decisions that may result in lower firm value.",
author = "Karen Fisher-Vanden and Thorburn, {Karin S.}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jeem.2011.04.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "430--445",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Economics and Management",
issn = "0095-0696",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives and shareholder wealth. / Fisher-Vanden, Karen; Thorburn, Karin S.

In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 62, No. 3, 01.11.2011, p. 430-445.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voluntary corporate environmental initiatives and shareholder wealth

AU - Fisher-Vanden, Karen

AU - Thorburn, Karin S.

PY - 2011/11/1

Y1 - 2011/11/1

N2 - Researchers debate whether environmental investments reduce firm value or actually improve financial performance. We provide some compelling evidence on shareholder wealth effects of membership in voluntary environmental programs (VEPs). Companies announcing membership in EPA's Climate Leaders, a program targeting reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, experience significantly negative abnormal stock returns. The price decline is larger in firms with poor corporate governance structures, and for high market-to-book (i.e., high growth) firms. However, firms joining Ceres, a program involving more general environmental commitments, have insignificant announcement returns, as do portfolios of industry rivals. Overall, corporate commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions appear to conflict with firm value maximization. This has important implications for policies that rely on voluntary initiatives to address climate change. Further, we find that firms facing climate-related shareholder resolutions or firms with weak corporate governance standards - giving managers the discretion to make such voluntary environmentally responsible investment decisions - are more likely to join Climate Leaders; decisions that may result in lower firm value.

AB - Researchers debate whether environmental investments reduce firm value or actually improve financial performance. We provide some compelling evidence on shareholder wealth effects of membership in voluntary environmental programs (VEPs). Companies announcing membership in EPA's Climate Leaders, a program targeting reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, experience significantly negative abnormal stock returns. The price decline is larger in firms with poor corporate governance structures, and for high market-to-book (i.e., high growth) firms. However, firms joining Ceres, a program involving more general environmental commitments, have insignificant announcement returns, as do portfolios of industry rivals. Overall, corporate commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions appear to conflict with firm value maximization. This has important implications for policies that rely on voluntary initiatives to address climate change. Further, we find that firms facing climate-related shareholder resolutions or firms with weak corporate governance standards - giving managers the discretion to make such voluntary environmentally responsible investment decisions - are more likely to join Climate Leaders; decisions that may result in lower firm value.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80955137534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80955137534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.04.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80955137534

VL - 62

SP - 430

EP - 445

JO - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

SN - 0095-0696

IS - 3

ER -