Votes for Women

Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates

Sona Nadenichek Golder, Laura B. Stephenson, Karine Van Der Straeten, André Blais, Damien Bol, Philipp Harfst, Jean François Laslier

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is a well-established finding that proportional representation (PR) electoral systems are associated with greater legislative representation for women than single member systems. However, the degree to which different types of PR rules affect voting for female candidates has not been fully explored. The existing literature is also hampered by a reliance on cross-national data in which individual vote preferences and electoral system features are endogenous. In this study, we draw upon an experiment conducted during the 2014 European Parliament (EP) elections to isolate the effects of different PR electoral systems. Participants in the experiment were given the opportunity to vote for real EP candidates in three different electoral systems: closed list, open list, and open list with panachage and cumulation. Because voter preferences can be held constant across the three different votes, we can evaluate the extent to which female candidates were more or less advantaged by the electoral system itself. We find that voters, regardless of their gender, support female candidates, and that this support is stronger under open electoral rules.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-131
Number of pages25
JournalPolitics and Gender
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

electoral system
voter
candidacy
proportional representation
election to the European Parliament
European Parliament
experiment
voting
gender

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Golder, S. N., Stephenson, L. B., Van Der Straeten, K., Blais, A., Bol, D., Harfst, P., & Laslier, J. F. (2017). Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates. Politics and Gender, 13(1), 107-131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000684
Golder, Sona Nadenichek ; Stephenson, Laura B. ; Van Der Straeten, Karine ; Blais, André ; Bol, Damien ; Harfst, Philipp ; Laslier, Jean François. / Votes for Women : Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates. In: Politics and Gender. 2017 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 107-131.
@article{14f8b8f2fedc4effa070dc4f67e88b73,
title = "Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates",
abstract = "It is a well-established finding that proportional representation (PR) electoral systems are associated with greater legislative representation for women than single member systems. However, the degree to which different types of PR rules affect voting for female candidates has not been fully explored. The existing literature is also hampered by a reliance on cross-national data in which individual vote preferences and electoral system features are endogenous. In this study, we draw upon an experiment conducted during the 2014 European Parliament (EP) elections to isolate the effects of different PR electoral systems. Participants in the experiment were given the opportunity to vote for real EP candidates in three different electoral systems: closed list, open list, and open list with panachage and cumulation. Because voter preferences can be held constant across the three different votes, we can evaluate the extent to which female candidates were more or less advantaged by the electoral system itself. We find that voters, regardless of their gender, support female candidates, and that this support is stronger under open electoral rules.",
author = "Golder, {Sona Nadenichek} and Stephenson, {Laura B.} and {Van Der Straeten}, Karine and Andr{\'e} Blais and Damien Bol and Philipp Harfst and Laslier, {Jean Fran{\cc}ois}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1743923X16000684",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "107--131",
journal = "Politics & Gender",
issn = "1743-923X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

Golder, SN, Stephenson, LB, Van Der Straeten, K, Blais, A, Bol, D, Harfst, P & Laslier, JF 2017, 'Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates', Politics and Gender, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 107-131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000684

Votes for Women : Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates. / Golder, Sona Nadenichek; Stephenson, Laura B.; Van Der Straeten, Karine; Blais, André; Bol, Damien; Harfst, Philipp; Laslier, Jean François.

In: Politics and Gender, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 107-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Votes for Women

T2 - Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates

AU - Golder, Sona Nadenichek

AU - Stephenson, Laura B.

AU - Van Der Straeten, Karine

AU - Blais, André

AU - Bol, Damien

AU - Harfst, Philipp

AU - Laslier, Jean François

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - It is a well-established finding that proportional representation (PR) electoral systems are associated with greater legislative representation for women than single member systems. However, the degree to which different types of PR rules affect voting for female candidates has not been fully explored. The existing literature is also hampered by a reliance on cross-national data in which individual vote preferences and electoral system features are endogenous. In this study, we draw upon an experiment conducted during the 2014 European Parliament (EP) elections to isolate the effects of different PR electoral systems. Participants in the experiment were given the opportunity to vote for real EP candidates in three different electoral systems: closed list, open list, and open list with panachage and cumulation. Because voter preferences can be held constant across the three different votes, we can evaluate the extent to which female candidates were more or less advantaged by the electoral system itself. We find that voters, regardless of their gender, support female candidates, and that this support is stronger under open electoral rules.

AB - It is a well-established finding that proportional representation (PR) electoral systems are associated with greater legislative representation for women than single member systems. However, the degree to which different types of PR rules affect voting for female candidates has not been fully explored. The existing literature is also hampered by a reliance on cross-national data in which individual vote preferences and electoral system features are endogenous. In this study, we draw upon an experiment conducted during the 2014 European Parliament (EP) elections to isolate the effects of different PR electoral systems. Participants in the experiment were given the opportunity to vote for real EP candidates in three different electoral systems: closed list, open list, and open list with panachage and cumulation. Because voter preferences can be held constant across the three different votes, we can evaluate the extent to which female candidates were more or less advantaged by the electoral system itself. We find that voters, regardless of their gender, support female candidates, and that this support is stronger under open electoral rules.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009382897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009382897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1743923X16000684

DO - 10.1017/S1743923X16000684

M3 - Review article

VL - 13

SP - 107

EP - 131

JO - Politics & Gender

JF - Politics & Gender

SN - 1743-923X

IS - 1

ER -

Golder SN, Stephenson LB, Van Der Straeten K, Blais A, Bol D, Harfst P et al. Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates. Politics and Gender. 2017 Mar 1;13(1):107-131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000684