War casualties, policy positions, and the fate of legislators

Scott Sigmund Gartner, Gary M. Segura, Bethany A. Barratt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Politicians appear to anticipate that the public will hold them accountable for war deaths. Yet, little is known about why some politicians openly oppose costly conflicts while others do not and the difference this makes to their electoral fortunes. Examining U.S. Senate elections from 1966-1972, we find that state-level casualties, military experience, and a variety of other factors affect candidate positions on the Vietnam War. Challenger and incumbent positions are negatively related, suggesting that strategic considerations play a role in wartime policy formation. We also find that war plays a role in elections. Incumbents from states that experience higher casualties receive a smaller percentage of the vote, an effect ameliorated when the incumbent opposes the war and his or her opponent does not. Wartime casualties, we conclude, influence both the perceived cost of the war and its salience, affecting both candidate positions and elections, suggesting that selectorate/electorate-type arguments about war and domestic politics can apply to the US system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)467-477
Number of pages11
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

election
politician
candidacy
senate
Vietnam
voter
experience
Military
death
politics
costs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Gartner, Scott Sigmund ; Segura, Gary M. ; Barratt, Bethany A. / War casualties, policy positions, and the fate of legislators. In: Political Research Quarterly. 2004 ; Vol. 57, No. 3. pp. 467-477.
@article{5e2a36bd759b4b069903b3ee1b5323f5,
title = "War casualties, policy positions, and the fate of legislators",
abstract = "Politicians appear to anticipate that the public will hold them accountable for war deaths. Yet, little is known about why some politicians openly oppose costly conflicts while others do not and the difference this makes to their electoral fortunes. Examining U.S. Senate elections from 1966-1972, we find that state-level casualties, military experience, and a variety of other factors affect candidate positions on the Vietnam War. Challenger and incumbent positions are negatively related, suggesting that strategic considerations play a role in wartime policy formation. We also find that war plays a role in elections. Incumbents from states that experience higher casualties receive a smaller percentage of the vote, an effect ameliorated when the incumbent opposes the war and his or her opponent does not. Wartime casualties, we conclude, influence both the perceived cost of the war and its salience, affecting both candidate positions and elections, suggesting that selectorate/electorate-type arguments about war and domestic politics can apply to the US system.",
author = "Gartner, {Scott Sigmund} and Segura, {Gary M.} and Barratt, {Bethany A.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/106591290405700311",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "467--477",
journal = "Political Research Quarterly",
issn = "1065-9129",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

War casualties, policy positions, and the fate of legislators. / Gartner, Scott Sigmund; Segura, Gary M.; Barratt, Bethany A.

In: Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 3, 01.01.2004, p. 467-477.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - War casualties, policy positions, and the fate of legislators

AU - Gartner, Scott Sigmund

AU - Segura, Gary M.

AU - Barratt, Bethany A.

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Politicians appear to anticipate that the public will hold them accountable for war deaths. Yet, little is known about why some politicians openly oppose costly conflicts while others do not and the difference this makes to their electoral fortunes. Examining U.S. Senate elections from 1966-1972, we find that state-level casualties, military experience, and a variety of other factors affect candidate positions on the Vietnam War. Challenger and incumbent positions are negatively related, suggesting that strategic considerations play a role in wartime policy formation. We also find that war plays a role in elections. Incumbents from states that experience higher casualties receive a smaller percentage of the vote, an effect ameliorated when the incumbent opposes the war and his or her opponent does not. Wartime casualties, we conclude, influence both the perceived cost of the war and its salience, affecting both candidate positions and elections, suggesting that selectorate/electorate-type arguments about war and domestic politics can apply to the US system.

AB - Politicians appear to anticipate that the public will hold them accountable for war deaths. Yet, little is known about why some politicians openly oppose costly conflicts while others do not and the difference this makes to their electoral fortunes. Examining U.S. Senate elections from 1966-1972, we find that state-level casualties, military experience, and a variety of other factors affect candidate positions on the Vietnam War. Challenger and incumbent positions are negatively related, suggesting that strategic considerations play a role in wartime policy formation. We also find that war plays a role in elections. Incumbents from states that experience higher casualties receive a smaller percentage of the vote, an effect ameliorated when the incumbent opposes the war and his or her opponent does not. Wartime casualties, we conclude, influence both the perceived cost of the war and its salience, affecting both candidate positions and elections, suggesting that selectorate/electorate-type arguments about war and domestic politics can apply to the US system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8744255717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8744255717&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/106591290405700311

DO - 10.1177/106591290405700311

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 467

EP - 477

JO - Political Research Quarterly

JF - Political Research Quarterly

SN - 1065-9129

IS - 3

ER -