War, Media, and Public Opinion: A Battle for Hearts and Minds

Michel M. Haigh

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter examines different hypotheses of public support for war. Mueller's (1971, 1973, 1994) log of cumulative casualties, Gartner and Segura's (1998) work examining marginal casualties, and Feaver and Gelpi's (2004) work discussing the media's role in framing casualties are examined. The Iraq War is used as a case study to show how the relationship between the political elite, the press, and the military impacts perceptions. Public support for war is influenced by casualties, political rhetoric, and the military's ability to make it look like they are winning the fight. Scholars debate about the strengths and weaknesses of the models, but in the end, the government has to win the public opinion battle at home and abroad.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research
PublisherWiley Blackwell
Pages189-199
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9781118516812
ISBN (Print)9781118516768
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 22 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'War, Media, and Public Opinion: A Battle for Hearts and Minds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Haigh, M. M. (2016). War, Media, and Public Opinion: A Battle for Hearts and Minds. In The Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research (pp. 189-199). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118516812.ch18