War, Media, and Public Opinion: A Battle for Hearts and Minds

Michel M. Haigh

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter examines different hypotheses of public support for war. Mueller's (1971, 1973, 1994) log of cumulative casualties, Gartner and Segura's (1998) work examining marginal casualties, and Feaver and Gelpi's (2004) work discussing the media's role in framing casualties are examined. The Iraq War is used as a case study to show how the relationship between the political elite, the press, and the military impacts perceptions. Public support for war is influenced by casualties, political rhetoric, and the military's ability to make it look like they are winning the fight. Scholars debate about the strengths and weaknesses of the models, but in the end, the government has to win the public opinion battle at home and abroad.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research
PublisherWiley Blackwell
Pages189-199
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9781118516812
ISBN (Print)9781118516768
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 22 2016

Fingerprint

public opinion
public support
Military
political elite
Iraq
rhetoric
ability

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Haigh, M. M. (2016). War, Media, and Public Opinion: A Battle for Hearts and Minds. In The Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research (pp. 189-199). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118516812.ch18
Haigh, Michel M. / War, Media, and Public Opinion : A Battle for Hearts and Minds. The Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research. Wiley Blackwell, 2016. pp. 189-199
@inbook{c79ac7a3a84440ae8984f9b4466692ab,
title = "War, Media, and Public Opinion: A Battle for Hearts and Minds",
abstract = "This chapter examines different hypotheses of public support for war. Mueller's (1971, 1973, 1994) log of cumulative casualties, Gartner and Segura's (1998) work examining marginal casualties, and Feaver and Gelpi's (2004) work discussing the media's role in framing casualties are examined. The Iraq War is used as a case study to show how the relationship between the political elite, the press, and the military impacts perceptions. Public support for war is influenced by casualties, political rhetoric, and the military's ability to make it look like they are winning the fight. Scholars debate about the strengths and weaknesses of the models, but in the end, the government has to win the public opinion battle at home and abroad.",
author = "Haigh, {Michel M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1002/9781118516812.ch18",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781118516768",
pages = "189--199",
booktitle = "The Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research",
publisher = "Wiley Blackwell",
address = "Japan",

}

Haigh, MM 2016, War, Media, and Public Opinion: A Battle for Hearts and Minds. in The Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research. Wiley Blackwell, pp. 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118516812.ch18

War, Media, and Public Opinion : A Battle for Hearts and Minds. / Haigh, Michel M.

The Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research. Wiley Blackwell, 2016. p. 189-199.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - War, Media, and Public Opinion

T2 - A Battle for Hearts and Minds

AU - Haigh, Michel M.

PY - 2016/4/22

Y1 - 2016/4/22

N2 - This chapter examines different hypotheses of public support for war. Mueller's (1971, 1973, 1994) log of cumulative casualties, Gartner and Segura's (1998) work examining marginal casualties, and Feaver and Gelpi's (2004) work discussing the media's role in framing casualties are examined. The Iraq War is used as a case study to show how the relationship between the political elite, the press, and the military impacts perceptions. Public support for war is influenced by casualties, political rhetoric, and the military's ability to make it look like they are winning the fight. Scholars debate about the strengths and weaknesses of the models, but in the end, the government has to win the public opinion battle at home and abroad.

AB - This chapter examines different hypotheses of public support for war. Mueller's (1971, 1973, 1994) log of cumulative casualties, Gartner and Segura's (1998) work examining marginal casualties, and Feaver and Gelpi's (2004) work discussing the media's role in framing casualties are examined. The Iraq War is used as a case study to show how the relationship between the political elite, the press, and the military impacts perceptions. Public support for war is influenced by casualties, political rhetoric, and the military's ability to make it look like they are winning the fight. Scholars debate about the strengths and weaknesses of the models, but in the end, the government has to win the public opinion battle at home and abroad.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026292303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026292303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/9781118516812.ch18

DO - 10.1002/9781118516812.ch18

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85026292303

SN - 9781118516768

SP - 189

EP - 199

BT - The Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research

PB - Wiley Blackwell

ER -

Haigh MM. War, Media, and Public Opinion: A Battle for Hearts and Minds. In The Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research. Wiley Blackwell. 2016. p. 189-199 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118516812.ch18