TY - JOUR
T1 - Water Stress from High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing Potentially Threatens Aquatic Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Arkansas, United States
AU - Entrekin, Sally
AU - Trainor, Anne
AU - Saiers, James
AU - Patterson, Lauren
AU - Maloney, Kelly
AU - Fargione, Joseph
AU - Kiesecker, Joseph
AU - Baruch-Mordo, Sharon
AU - Konschnik, Katherine
AU - Wiseman, Hannah
AU - Nicot, Jean Philippe
AU - Ryan, Joseph N.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank SNAPP: Science for Nature and People Partnership Impacts of hydraulic fracturing on water quantity and quality Working Group at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, a Center funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the University of California, Santa Barbara, and the State of California. We are indebted to Shawn Jackson, at Arkansas Natural Resources, for her thorough explanation of ANRC nonriparian permitting procedures and providing AR nonriparian permits. We also thank Cayla Calderwood for summarizing water resource policy for Michigan and the Susquehanna River Basin. Amy Braccia and three anonymous reviewers provided comments that improved the manuscript.Use of trade product or firm names does not imply endorsement by the U.S. government.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2018/2/20
Y1 - 2018/2/20
N2 - Demand for high-volume, short duration water withdrawals could create water stress to aquatic organisms in Fayetteville Shale streams sourced for hydraulic fracturing fluids. We estimated potential water stress using permitted water withdrawal volumes and actual water withdrawals compared to monthly median, low, and high streamflows. Risk for biological stress was considered at 20% of long-term median and 10% of high- and low-flow thresholds. Future well build-out projections estimated potential for continued stress. Most water was permitted from small, free-flowing streams and "frack" ponds (dammed streams). Permitted 12-h pumping volumes exceeded median streamflow at 50% of withdrawal sites in June, when flows were low. Daily water usage, from operator disclosures, compared to median streamflow showed possible water stress in 7-51% of catchments from June-November, respectively. If 100% of produced water was recycled, per-well water use declined by 25%, reducing threshold exceedance by 10%. Future water stress was predicted to occur in fewer catchments important for drinking water and species of conservation concern due to the decline in new well installations and increased use of recycled water. Accessible and precise withdrawal and streamflow data are critical moving forward to assess and mitigate water stress in streams that experience high-volume withdrawals.
AB - Demand for high-volume, short duration water withdrawals could create water stress to aquatic organisms in Fayetteville Shale streams sourced for hydraulic fracturing fluids. We estimated potential water stress using permitted water withdrawal volumes and actual water withdrawals compared to monthly median, low, and high streamflows. Risk for biological stress was considered at 20% of long-term median and 10% of high- and low-flow thresholds. Future well build-out projections estimated potential for continued stress. Most water was permitted from small, free-flowing streams and "frack" ponds (dammed streams). Permitted 12-h pumping volumes exceeded median streamflow at 50% of withdrawal sites in June, when flows were low. Daily water usage, from operator disclosures, compared to median streamflow showed possible water stress in 7-51% of catchments from June-November, respectively. If 100% of produced water was recycled, per-well water use declined by 25%, reducing threshold exceedance by 10%. Future water stress was predicted to occur in fewer catchments important for drinking water and species of conservation concern due to the decline in new well installations and increased use of recycled water. Accessible and precise withdrawal and streamflow data are critical moving forward to assess and mitigate water stress in streams that experience high-volume withdrawals.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042269692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042269692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.7b03304
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.7b03304
M3 - Article
C2 - 29383932
AN - SCOPUS:85042269692
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 52
SP - 2349
EP - 2358
JO - Environmental Science & Technology
JF - Environmental Science & Technology
IS - 4
ER -