Weighing in: The taste-engineering frame in obesity expert discourse

Selena E. Ortiz, Frederick J. Zimmerman, Franklin D. Gilliam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. We sought expert opinion on the problems with 2 dominant obesityprevention discourse frames-personal responsibility and the environment-and examined alternative frames for understanding and addressing obesity.

Methods. We conducted 60-minute, semistructured interviews with 15 US-based obesity experts. We manually coded and entered interview transcripts into software, generating themes and subthematic areas that captured the debate's essence.

Results. Although the environmental frame is the dominant model used in communications with the public and policymakers, several experts found that communicating key messages within this frame was difficult because of the enormity of the obesity problem. A subframe of the environmental frame-the taste-engineering frame-identifies food industry strategies to influence the overconsumption of certain foods and beverages. This emerging frame deconstructs the environmental frame so that causal attributes and responsible agents are more easily identifiable and proposed policies and public health interventions more salient.

Conclusions. Expert interviews are an invaluable resource for understanding how experts use frames in discussing their work and in conversations with the public and policymakers. Future empirical studies testing the effectiveness of the taste-engineering frame on public opinion and support for structural-level health policies are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)554-559
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican journal of public health
Volume105
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

Obesity
Interviews
Food and Beverages
Public Opinion
Food Industry
Expert Testimony
Health Policy
Health Status
Software
Public Health
Communication

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Ortiz, Selena E. ; Zimmerman, Frederick J. ; Gilliam, Franklin D. / Weighing in : The taste-engineering frame in obesity expert discourse. In: American journal of public health. 2015 ; Vol. 105, No. 3. pp. 554-559.
@article{ddd7f6d02cab4d23884ae5cccda5f9a5,
title = "Weighing in: The taste-engineering frame in obesity expert discourse",
abstract = "Objectives. We sought expert opinion on the problems with 2 dominant obesityprevention discourse frames-personal responsibility and the environment-and examined alternative frames for understanding and addressing obesity.Methods. We conducted 60-minute, semistructured interviews with 15 US-based obesity experts. We manually coded and entered interview transcripts into software, generating themes and subthematic areas that captured the debate's essence.Results. Although the environmental frame is the dominant model used in communications with the public and policymakers, several experts found that communicating key messages within this frame was difficult because of the enormity of the obesity problem. A subframe of the environmental frame-the taste-engineering frame-identifies food industry strategies to influence the overconsumption of certain foods and beverages. This emerging frame deconstructs the environmental frame so that causal attributes and responsible agents are more easily identifiable and proposed policies and public health interventions more salient.Conclusions. Expert interviews are an invaluable resource for understanding how experts use frames in discussing their work and in conversations with the public and policymakers. Future empirical studies testing the effectiveness of the taste-engineering frame on public opinion and support for structural-level health policies are needed.",
author = "Ortiz, {Selena E.} and Zimmerman, {Frederick J.} and Gilliam, {Franklin D.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2014.302273",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "554--559",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Weighing in : The taste-engineering frame in obesity expert discourse. / Ortiz, Selena E.; Zimmerman, Frederick J.; Gilliam, Franklin D.

In: American journal of public health, Vol. 105, No. 3, 01.03.2015, p. 554-559.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weighing in

T2 - The taste-engineering frame in obesity expert discourse

AU - Ortiz, Selena E.

AU - Zimmerman, Frederick J.

AU - Gilliam, Franklin D.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Objectives. We sought expert opinion on the problems with 2 dominant obesityprevention discourse frames-personal responsibility and the environment-and examined alternative frames for understanding and addressing obesity.Methods. We conducted 60-minute, semistructured interviews with 15 US-based obesity experts. We manually coded and entered interview transcripts into software, generating themes and subthematic areas that captured the debate's essence.Results. Although the environmental frame is the dominant model used in communications with the public and policymakers, several experts found that communicating key messages within this frame was difficult because of the enormity of the obesity problem. A subframe of the environmental frame-the taste-engineering frame-identifies food industry strategies to influence the overconsumption of certain foods and beverages. This emerging frame deconstructs the environmental frame so that causal attributes and responsible agents are more easily identifiable and proposed policies and public health interventions more salient.Conclusions. Expert interviews are an invaluable resource for understanding how experts use frames in discussing their work and in conversations with the public and policymakers. Future empirical studies testing the effectiveness of the taste-engineering frame on public opinion and support for structural-level health policies are needed.

AB - Objectives. We sought expert opinion on the problems with 2 dominant obesityprevention discourse frames-personal responsibility and the environment-and examined alternative frames for understanding and addressing obesity.Methods. We conducted 60-minute, semistructured interviews with 15 US-based obesity experts. We manually coded and entered interview transcripts into software, generating themes and subthematic areas that captured the debate's essence.Results. Although the environmental frame is the dominant model used in communications with the public and policymakers, several experts found that communicating key messages within this frame was difficult because of the enormity of the obesity problem. A subframe of the environmental frame-the taste-engineering frame-identifies food industry strategies to influence the overconsumption of certain foods and beverages. This emerging frame deconstructs the environmental frame so that causal attributes and responsible agents are more easily identifiable and proposed policies and public health interventions more salient.Conclusions. Expert interviews are an invaluable resource for understanding how experts use frames in discussing their work and in conversations with the public and policymakers. Future empirical studies testing the effectiveness of the taste-engineering frame on public opinion and support for structural-level health policies are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922702886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922702886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302273

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302273

M3 - Article

C2 - 25602888

AN - SCOPUS:84922702886

VL - 105

SP - 554

EP - 559

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 3

ER -