Weight loss maintenance strategies among rural breast cancer survivors: The rural women connecting for better health trial

Christie A. Befort, Jennifer R. Klemp, Debra K. Sullivan, Theresa Shireman, Francisco J. Diaz, Kathryn Schmitz, Michael G. Perri, Carol Fabian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Obesity is a risk factor for breast cancer recurrence. Rural women have higher obesity rates compared with urban women and are in need of distance-based interventions that promote long-term weight loss. Methods: In this two-phase trial, rural breast cancer survivors who lost >5% of their starting weight during a 6-month lifestyle intervention (delivered through weekly group conference calls) were randomized to one of two 12-month interventions for weight loss maintenance: continued biweekly phone-based group counseling or mailed newsletters. The primary outcome was weight regain from 6 to 18 months. Secondary outcomes included dichotomous measures of weight change and costs. Results: Mean weight loss at 6 months was 14.0 ± 5.1%. Participants in the group phone condition regained less weight (3.3 ± 4.8 kg) compared with participants in the newsletter condition (4.9 ± 4.8 kg; P = 0.03). At 18 months, 75.3% of participants in the group phone condition remained ≥5% below baseline weight compared with 57.8% in the newsletter condition (P = 0.02). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $882 to keep one more person ≥5% below baseline weight. Conclusions: A lifestyle intervention incorporating group phone-based support improved the magnitude of weight loss maintained and increased the proportion of survivors who maintained clinically significant reductions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2070-2077
Number of pages8
JournalObesity
Volume24
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Survivors
Weight Loss
Maintenance
Breast Neoplasms
Weights and Measures
Health
Life Style
Obesity
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Counseling
Costs and Cost Analysis
Recurrence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Befort, C. A., Klemp, J. R., Sullivan, D. K., Shireman, T., Diaz, F. J., Schmitz, K., ... Fabian, C. (2016). Weight loss maintenance strategies among rural breast cancer survivors: The rural women connecting for better health trial. Obesity, 24(10), 2070-2077. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21625
Befort, Christie A. ; Klemp, Jennifer R. ; Sullivan, Debra K. ; Shireman, Theresa ; Diaz, Francisco J. ; Schmitz, Kathryn ; Perri, Michael G. ; Fabian, Carol. / Weight loss maintenance strategies among rural breast cancer survivors : The rural women connecting for better health trial. In: Obesity. 2016 ; Vol. 24, No. 10. pp. 2070-2077.
@article{9657899c227542e2be477a35e3571580,
title = "Weight loss maintenance strategies among rural breast cancer survivors: The rural women connecting for better health trial",
abstract = "Objective: Obesity is a risk factor for breast cancer recurrence. Rural women have higher obesity rates compared with urban women and are in need of distance-based interventions that promote long-term weight loss. Methods: In this two-phase trial, rural breast cancer survivors who lost >5{\%} of their starting weight during a 6-month lifestyle intervention (delivered through weekly group conference calls) were randomized to one of two 12-month interventions for weight loss maintenance: continued biweekly phone-based group counseling or mailed newsletters. The primary outcome was weight regain from 6 to 18 months. Secondary outcomes included dichotomous measures of weight change and costs. Results: Mean weight loss at 6 months was 14.0 ± 5.1{\%}. Participants in the group phone condition regained less weight (3.3 ± 4.8 kg) compared with participants in the newsletter condition (4.9 ± 4.8 kg; P = 0.03). At 18 months, 75.3{\%} of participants in the group phone condition remained ≥5{\%} below baseline weight compared with 57.8{\%} in the newsletter condition (P = 0.02). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $882 to keep one more person ≥5{\%} below baseline weight. Conclusions: A lifestyle intervention incorporating group phone-based support improved the magnitude of weight loss maintained and increased the proportion of survivors who maintained clinically significant reductions.",
author = "Befort, {Christie A.} and Klemp, {Jennifer R.} and Sullivan, {Debra K.} and Theresa Shireman and Diaz, {Francisco J.} and Kathryn Schmitz and Perri, {Michael G.} and Carol Fabian",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/oby.21625",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "2070--2077",
journal = "Obesity",
issn = "1930-7381",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

Befort, CA, Klemp, JR, Sullivan, DK, Shireman, T, Diaz, FJ, Schmitz, K, Perri, MG & Fabian, C 2016, 'Weight loss maintenance strategies among rural breast cancer survivors: The rural women connecting for better health trial', Obesity, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 2070-2077. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21625

Weight loss maintenance strategies among rural breast cancer survivors : The rural women connecting for better health trial. / Befort, Christie A.; Klemp, Jennifer R.; Sullivan, Debra K.; Shireman, Theresa; Diaz, Francisco J.; Schmitz, Kathryn; Perri, Michael G.; Fabian, Carol.

In: Obesity, Vol. 24, No. 10, 01.10.2016, p. 2070-2077.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weight loss maintenance strategies among rural breast cancer survivors

T2 - The rural women connecting for better health trial

AU - Befort, Christie A.

AU - Klemp, Jennifer R.

AU - Sullivan, Debra K.

AU - Shireman, Theresa

AU - Diaz, Francisco J.

AU - Schmitz, Kathryn

AU - Perri, Michael G.

AU - Fabian, Carol

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Objective: Obesity is a risk factor for breast cancer recurrence. Rural women have higher obesity rates compared with urban women and are in need of distance-based interventions that promote long-term weight loss. Methods: In this two-phase trial, rural breast cancer survivors who lost >5% of their starting weight during a 6-month lifestyle intervention (delivered through weekly group conference calls) were randomized to one of two 12-month interventions for weight loss maintenance: continued biweekly phone-based group counseling or mailed newsletters. The primary outcome was weight regain from 6 to 18 months. Secondary outcomes included dichotomous measures of weight change and costs. Results: Mean weight loss at 6 months was 14.0 ± 5.1%. Participants in the group phone condition regained less weight (3.3 ± 4.8 kg) compared with participants in the newsletter condition (4.9 ± 4.8 kg; P = 0.03). At 18 months, 75.3% of participants in the group phone condition remained ≥5% below baseline weight compared with 57.8% in the newsletter condition (P = 0.02). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $882 to keep one more person ≥5% below baseline weight. Conclusions: A lifestyle intervention incorporating group phone-based support improved the magnitude of weight loss maintained and increased the proportion of survivors who maintained clinically significant reductions.

AB - Objective: Obesity is a risk factor for breast cancer recurrence. Rural women have higher obesity rates compared with urban women and are in need of distance-based interventions that promote long-term weight loss. Methods: In this two-phase trial, rural breast cancer survivors who lost >5% of their starting weight during a 6-month lifestyle intervention (delivered through weekly group conference calls) were randomized to one of two 12-month interventions for weight loss maintenance: continued biweekly phone-based group counseling or mailed newsletters. The primary outcome was weight regain from 6 to 18 months. Secondary outcomes included dichotomous measures of weight change and costs. Results: Mean weight loss at 6 months was 14.0 ± 5.1%. Participants in the group phone condition regained less weight (3.3 ± 4.8 kg) compared with participants in the newsletter condition (4.9 ± 4.8 kg; P = 0.03). At 18 months, 75.3% of participants in the group phone condition remained ≥5% below baseline weight compared with 57.8% in the newsletter condition (P = 0.02). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $882 to keep one more person ≥5% below baseline weight. Conclusions: A lifestyle intervention incorporating group phone-based support improved the magnitude of weight loss maintained and increased the proportion of survivors who maintained clinically significant reductions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988694120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84988694120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/oby.21625

DO - 10.1002/oby.21625

M3 - Article

C2 - 27581328

AN - SCOPUS:84988694120

VL - 24

SP - 2070

EP - 2077

JO - Obesity

JF - Obesity

SN - 1930-7381

IS - 10

ER -