TY - JOUR
T1 - What am I doing? It depends
T2 - agency and action identification
AU - Potts, Cory A.
AU - Carlson, Richard A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Nancy Dennis, Robert Sainburg, Brad Wyble, Lisa Stevenson, and Sophie Paolizzi for helpful comments and discussions. We also thank Wilfried Kunde, Katharina Schwarz, and an anonymous reviewer for valuable feedback on the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Actions can be identified at a range of levels, from higher level, outcome-related descriptions to lower level, movement-related descriptions. But how do these levels of identification influence the experience of control (agency) over a task? We addressed the relation between the level of action identification and agency using a hierarchical task modeled from typing. Participants memorized letter sequences and reported them by moving a cursor to targets that contained letters. To manipulate lower level (aiming) difficulty, the targets were either large or small. To manipulate higher level (memory) difficulty, the letter sequences were either constant or random within a block. We found effects of higher and lower level difficulty on agency and action identification. Moreover, we found interactive effects of higher and lower level difficulty on performance. We discuss these findings in terms of contributions to the study of agency, and some differences from the results of previous studies of action identification.
AB - Actions can be identified at a range of levels, from higher level, outcome-related descriptions to lower level, movement-related descriptions. But how do these levels of identification influence the experience of control (agency) over a task? We addressed the relation between the level of action identification and agency using a hierarchical task modeled from typing. Participants memorized letter sequences and reported them by moving a cursor to targets that contained letters. To manipulate lower level (aiming) difficulty, the targets were either large or small. To manipulate higher level (memory) difficulty, the letter sequences were either constant or random within a block. We found effects of higher and lower level difficulty on agency and action identification. Moreover, we found interactive effects of higher and lower level difficulty on performance. We discuss these findings in terms of contributions to the study of agency, and some differences from the results of previous studies of action identification.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104136590&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104136590&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00426-021-01510-9
DO - 10.1007/s00426-021-01510-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 33839940
AN - SCOPUS:85104136590
SN - 0340-0727
VL - 86
SP - 651
EP - 666
JO - Psychologische Forschung
JF - Psychologische Forschung
IS - 2
ER -