TY - JOUR
T1 - What Food waste solutions do people support?
AU - Fan, Linlin
AU - Ellison, Brenna
AU - Wilson, Norbert L.W.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Edward C. Jaenicke, Yizao Liu, Martina Vecchi for their excellent suggestions. This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) , U.S. Department of Agriculture , under award number ILLU-971-328 and 2016-67023-24817 . This work is also supported by the USDA NIFA Hatch Appropriations under Project #PEN04709 and Accession #1019915 .The funding source had no involvement in the study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - In the U.S., the estimated food waste at the household level is 32% of purchased food, translating to $240 billion in economic losses. The U.S. Department of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Agency set the first-ever national food waste reduction goal of a 50-percent reduction by 2030. Under this policy environment, this study assesses public support for nine food waste solutions: changes in food packaging, changes in portion sizes, standardization of date labeling terms, selling imperfect produce in retail stores, making donations easier, using uneaten food to feed animals, implementing composting in communities, consumer education campaigns on food waste, and taxing food waste. An online survey was sent to a nationally representative sample of U.S. respondents that asked about support for and perception of the effectiveness of each food waste solution. This study finds that making donations easier and the standardization of date labels were the most supported food waste solutions. Different food waste solutions appealed to different demographics of people based on their personal food waste experiences. Results are similar for the perception of the effectiveness of each food waste solution. Nevertheless, the percentage of respondents that considered each food waste solution to be effective was almost always less than the share of respondents who supported the solution. Thus, it is important to be cautious about this divergence when assessing public opinion on potential solutions, which may be enacted as policies designed to mitigate food waste.
AB - In the U.S., the estimated food waste at the household level is 32% of purchased food, translating to $240 billion in economic losses. The U.S. Department of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Agency set the first-ever national food waste reduction goal of a 50-percent reduction by 2030. Under this policy environment, this study assesses public support for nine food waste solutions: changes in food packaging, changes in portion sizes, standardization of date labeling terms, selling imperfect produce in retail stores, making donations easier, using uneaten food to feed animals, implementing composting in communities, consumer education campaigns on food waste, and taxing food waste. An online survey was sent to a nationally representative sample of U.S. respondents that asked about support for and perception of the effectiveness of each food waste solution. This study finds that making donations easier and the standardization of date labels were the most supported food waste solutions. Different food waste solutions appealed to different demographics of people based on their personal food waste experiences. Results are similar for the perception of the effectiveness of each food waste solution. Nevertheless, the percentage of respondents that considered each food waste solution to be effective was almost always less than the share of respondents who supported the solution. Thus, it is important to be cautious about this divergence when assessing public opinion on potential solutions, which may be enacted as policies designed to mitigate food waste.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120505747&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120505747&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129907
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129907
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85120505747
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 330
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
M1 - 129907
ER -