What happened at the first American writers’ congress? Kenneth Burke’s “Revolutionary symbolism in America”

Ann George, John L. Selzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Burke’s famous performance at the First American Writers’ Congress in 1935 should be understood in relation to its occasion. The Congress was held to enlist the services of writers in creating a broad Popular Front, or People’s Front, to encourage social change, so Burke’s recommendation that “the people”; ought to be substituted for “the worker”; in Communist Party symbolism—that “propaganda by inclusion”; ought to succeed “propaganda by exclusion “—was actually in moderate keeping with the Congress’ broad aim. Though his recommendation was resisted by some, Burke was actually not so much marginalized by the Congress as identified with its controversies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-66
Number of pages20
JournalRhetoric Society Quarterly
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2003

Fingerprint

symbolism
propaganda
popular front
writer
communist party
social change
exclusion
inclusion
worker
performance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{35ec659857374605926290523535ff9d,
title = "What happened at the first American writers’ congress? Kenneth Burke’s “Revolutionary symbolism in America”",
abstract = "Burke’s famous performance at the First American Writers’ Congress in 1935 should be understood in relation to its occasion. The Congress was held to enlist the services of writers in creating a broad Popular Front, or People’s Front, to encourage social change, so Burke’s recommendation that “the people”; ought to be substituted for “the worker”; in Communist Party symbolism—that “propaganda by inclusion”; ought to succeed “propaganda by exclusion “—was actually in moderate keeping with the Congress’ broad aim. Though his recommendation was resisted by some, Burke was actually not so much marginalized by the Congress as identified with its controversies.",
author = "Ann George and Selzer, {John L.}",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/02773940309391253",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "47--66",
journal = "RSQ-Rhetoric Society Quarterly",
issn = "0277-3945",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

What happened at the first American writers’ congress? Kenneth Burke’s “Revolutionary symbolism in America”. / George, Ann; Selzer, John L.

In: Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 2, 01.03.2003, p. 47-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What happened at the first American writers’ congress? Kenneth Burke’s “Revolutionary symbolism in America”

AU - George, Ann

AU - Selzer, John L.

PY - 2003/3/1

Y1 - 2003/3/1

N2 - Burke’s famous performance at the First American Writers’ Congress in 1935 should be understood in relation to its occasion. The Congress was held to enlist the services of writers in creating a broad Popular Front, or People’s Front, to encourage social change, so Burke’s recommendation that “the people”; ought to be substituted for “the worker”; in Communist Party symbolism—that “propaganda by inclusion”; ought to succeed “propaganda by exclusion “—was actually in moderate keeping with the Congress’ broad aim. Though his recommendation was resisted by some, Burke was actually not so much marginalized by the Congress as identified with its controversies.

AB - Burke’s famous performance at the First American Writers’ Congress in 1935 should be understood in relation to its occasion. The Congress was held to enlist the services of writers in creating a broad Popular Front, or People’s Front, to encourage social change, so Burke’s recommendation that “the people”; ought to be substituted for “the worker”; in Communist Party symbolism—that “propaganda by inclusion”; ought to succeed “propaganda by exclusion “—was actually in moderate keeping with the Congress’ broad aim. Though his recommendation was resisted by some, Burke was actually not so much marginalized by the Congress as identified with its controversies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13844291453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13844291453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02773940309391253

DO - 10.1080/02773940309391253

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:13844291453

VL - 33

SP - 47

EP - 66

JO - RSQ-Rhetoric Society Quarterly

JF - RSQ-Rhetoric Society Quarterly

SN - 0277-3945

IS - 2

ER -