What If Psychology Took Intersectionality Seriously?

Changing How Psychologists Think About Participants

Kaitlin McCormick-Huhn, Leah R. Warner, Isis H. Settles, Stephanie Shields

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Using intersectionality to change how psychologists think about the demographic profile of their participants is one readily available change that psychologists across the discipline can implement to improve psychological science. In this article, we aim to provide a guide for psychologists who are not already engaged with feminist practices and/or are unsure of how an intersectional approach to participants applies to their research. We argue that by engaging with four perspective shifts of intersectional thinking: multidimensionality, dynamic construction, structural power, and outcomes of systemic disadvantage and advantage, psychologists can more accurately represent the “person” that psychology, as a discipline, seeks to understand. We suggest changes at the researcher, journal, and grant-making agency levels to support an intersectional reconceptualization of participants. As psychology continues to change, in order to foster reproducible science practices and research with relevance to real-world problems, there is opportunity to promote discipline-level change that would take intersectionality seriously.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPsychology of Women Quarterly
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

intersectionality
psychologist
psychology
Psychology
science
grant
Organized Financing
human being
Psychologists
Intersectionality
Research
Research Personnel
Demography

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{6f2d4a50e43b4ed3bb596f0419d873fd,
title = "What If Psychology Took Intersectionality Seriously?: Changing How Psychologists Think About Participants",
abstract = "Using intersectionality to change how psychologists think about the demographic profile of their participants is one readily available change that psychologists across the discipline can implement to improve psychological science. In this article, we aim to provide a guide for psychologists who are not already engaged with feminist practices and/or are unsure of how an intersectional approach to participants applies to their research. We argue that by engaging with four perspective shifts of intersectional thinking: multidimensionality, dynamic construction, structural power, and outcomes of systemic disadvantage and advantage, psychologists can more accurately represent the “person” that psychology, as a discipline, seeks to understand. We suggest changes at the researcher, journal, and grant-making agency levels to support an intersectional reconceptualization of participants. As psychology continues to change, in order to foster reproducible science practices and research with relevance to real-world problems, there is opportunity to promote discipline-level change that would take intersectionality seriously.",
author = "Kaitlin McCormick-Huhn and Warner, {Leah R.} and Settles, {Isis H.} and Stephanie Shields",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0361684319866430",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Psychology of Women Quarterly",
issn = "0361-6843",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

What If Psychology Took Intersectionality Seriously? Changing How Psychologists Think About Participants. / McCormick-Huhn, Kaitlin; Warner, Leah R.; Settles, Isis H.; Shields, Stephanie.

In: Psychology of Women Quarterly, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What If Psychology Took Intersectionality Seriously?

T2 - Changing How Psychologists Think About Participants

AU - McCormick-Huhn, Kaitlin

AU - Warner, Leah R.

AU - Settles, Isis H.

AU - Shields, Stephanie

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Using intersectionality to change how psychologists think about the demographic profile of their participants is one readily available change that psychologists across the discipline can implement to improve psychological science. In this article, we aim to provide a guide for psychologists who are not already engaged with feminist practices and/or are unsure of how an intersectional approach to participants applies to their research. We argue that by engaging with four perspective shifts of intersectional thinking: multidimensionality, dynamic construction, structural power, and outcomes of systemic disadvantage and advantage, psychologists can more accurately represent the “person” that psychology, as a discipline, seeks to understand. We suggest changes at the researcher, journal, and grant-making agency levels to support an intersectional reconceptualization of participants. As psychology continues to change, in order to foster reproducible science practices and research with relevance to real-world problems, there is opportunity to promote discipline-level change that would take intersectionality seriously.

AB - Using intersectionality to change how psychologists think about the demographic profile of their participants is one readily available change that psychologists across the discipline can implement to improve psychological science. In this article, we aim to provide a guide for psychologists who are not already engaged with feminist practices and/or are unsure of how an intersectional approach to participants applies to their research. We argue that by engaging with four perspective shifts of intersectional thinking: multidimensionality, dynamic construction, structural power, and outcomes of systemic disadvantage and advantage, psychologists can more accurately represent the “person” that psychology, as a discipline, seeks to understand. We suggest changes at the researcher, journal, and grant-making agency levels to support an intersectional reconceptualization of participants. As psychology continues to change, in order to foster reproducible science practices and research with relevance to real-world problems, there is opportunity to promote discipline-level change that would take intersectionality seriously.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070250997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070250997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0361684319866430

DO - 10.1177/0361684319866430

M3 - Article

JO - Psychology of Women Quarterly

JF - Psychology of Women Quarterly

SN - 0361-6843

ER -