What is straight cannot fall: Gothic architecture, Scholasticism, and dynamics

Steven A. Walton, Thomas E. Boothby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It has long been shown that medieval builders primarily used geometrical constructions to design medieval architecture. The thought processes involved, however, have been considered to be remote from the natural philosophical speculations of the Scholastics, who, following Aristotle, had taken the basis of physics to be the study of dynamics, or change. However, investigations of the Expertises of Chartres, Florence, Milan, and other documents related to medieval building suggest that medieval architects, in speaking of their work, resort to recognizable dynamic arguments, structured similarly to the speculations of Scholastic philosophers. These dynamic explanations of structural behaviour persist at least into the 17th century, but thereafter lost out to the arguments based on statics made by modern scholars attempting to explain the endurance of these structures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)347-376
Number of pages30
JournalHistory of Science
Volume52
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Scholasticism
Medieval Period
Gothic Architecture
Scholastics
Speculation
Philosopher
Aristotle
Thought Processes
Builders
Medieval Architecture
Chartres
Endurance
Florence
Expertise
Physics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

@article{ecc651af8cd64ba287e64691faa969df,
title = "What is straight cannot fall: Gothic architecture, Scholasticism, and dynamics",
abstract = "It has long been shown that medieval builders primarily used geometrical constructions to design medieval architecture. The thought processes involved, however, have been considered to be remote from the natural philosophical speculations of the Scholastics, who, following Aristotle, had taken the basis of physics to be the study of dynamics, or change. However, investigations of the Expertises of Chartres, Florence, Milan, and other documents related to medieval building suggest that medieval architects, in speaking of their work, resort to recognizable dynamic arguments, structured similarly to the speculations of Scholastic philosophers. These dynamic explanations of structural behaviour persist at least into the 17th century, but thereafter lost out to the arguments based on statics made by modern scholars attempting to explain the endurance of these structures.",
author = "Walton, {Steven A.} and Boothby, {Thomas E.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0073275314559329",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "347--376",
journal = "History of Science",
issn = "0073-2753",
publisher = "Science History Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

What is straight cannot fall : Gothic architecture, Scholasticism, and dynamics. / Walton, Steven A.; Boothby, Thomas E.

In: History of Science, Vol. 52, No. 4, 01.12.2014, p. 347-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is straight cannot fall

T2 - Gothic architecture, Scholasticism, and dynamics

AU - Walton, Steven A.

AU - Boothby, Thomas E.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - It has long been shown that medieval builders primarily used geometrical constructions to design medieval architecture. The thought processes involved, however, have been considered to be remote from the natural philosophical speculations of the Scholastics, who, following Aristotle, had taken the basis of physics to be the study of dynamics, or change. However, investigations of the Expertises of Chartres, Florence, Milan, and other documents related to medieval building suggest that medieval architects, in speaking of their work, resort to recognizable dynamic arguments, structured similarly to the speculations of Scholastic philosophers. These dynamic explanations of structural behaviour persist at least into the 17th century, but thereafter lost out to the arguments based on statics made by modern scholars attempting to explain the endurance of these structures.

AB - It has long been shown that medieval builders primarily used geometrical constructions to design medieval architecture. The thought processes involved, however, have been considered to be remote from the natural philosophical speculations of the Scholastics, who, following Aristotle, had taken the basis of physics to be the study of dynamics, or change. However, investigations of the Expertises of Chartres, Florence, Milan, and other documents related to medieval building suggest that medieval architects, in speaking of their work, resort to recognizable dynamic arguments, structured similarly to the speculations of Scholastic philosophers. These dynamic explanations of structural behaviour persist at least into the 17th century, but thereafter lost out to the arguments based on statics made by modern scholars attempting to explain the endurance of these structures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921889650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921889650&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0073275314559329

DO - 10.1177/0073275314559329

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84921889650

VL - 52

SP - 347

EP - 376

JO - History of Science

JF - History of Science

SN - 0073-2753

IS - 4

ER -