What is strategic management, really? A consensus view on the essence of the field

Rajiv Nag, Donald C. Hambrick, Ming Jer Chen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

What is strategic management really about? In spite of 25 years of vibrant growth, the essence of the field of strategic management is highly ambiguous. It is commonly asserted that the field is fragmented and lacks a distinct identity. These skepticisms and concerns, however, are paradoxically at odds with the great success that strategic management has enjoyed in recent years. How might one explain this paradox? We argue that strategic management scholars share a common albeit implicit understanding of what their field is all about- a consensus that is reflected in the language they use. In this paper, we adopt a linguistic perspective to extract the distinctive lexicon of the field, and through that lexicon we impute the consensual definition of the field of strategic management. We hope that our efforts will help consolidate the gains of the field as well as promote new introspection about what our field is, compared to what we want it to be.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAcademy of Management 2005 Annual Meeting: A New Vision of Management in the 21st Century, AOM 2005
StatePublished - 2005
Event65th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2005 - Honolulu, HI, United States
Duration: Aug 5 2005Aug 10 2005

Other

Other65th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2005
CountryUnited States
CityHonolulu, HI
Period8/5/058/10/05

Fingerprint

Strategic management
Language
Paradox

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Information Systems and Management

Cite this

Nag, R., Hambrick, D. C., & Chen, M. J. (2005). What is strategic management, really? A consensus view on the essence of the field. In Academy of Management 2005 Annual Meeting: A New Vision of Management in the 21st Century, AOM 2005
Nag, Rajiv ; Hambrick, Donald C. ; Chen, Ming Jer. / What is strategic management, really? A consensus view on the essence of the field. Academy of Management 2005 Annual Meeting: A New Vision of Management in the 21st Century, AOM 2005. 2005.
@inproceedings{bfa4b2f5a91d4bfaa6b84586b542ca71,
title = "What is strategic management, really? A consensus view on the essence of the field",
abstract = "What is strategic management really about? In spite of 25 years of vibrant growth, the essence of the field of strategic management is highly ambiguous. It is commonly asserted that the field is fragmented and lacks a distinct identity. These skepticisms and concerns, however, are paradoxically at odds with the great success that strategic management has enjoyed in recent years. How might one explain this paradox? We argue that strategic management scholars share a common albeit implicit understanding of what their field is all about- a consensus that is reflected in the language they use. In this paper, we adopt a linguistic perspective to extract the distinctive lexicon of the field, and through that lexicon we impute the consensual definition of the field of strategic management. We hope that our efforts will help consolidate the gains of the field as well as promote new introspection about what our field is, compared to what we want it to be.",
author = "Rajiv Nag and Hambrick, {Donald C.} and Chen, {Ming Jer}",
year = "2005",
language = "English (US)",
booktitle = "Academy of Management 2005 Annual Meeting: A New Vision of Management in the 21st Century, AOM 2005",

}

Nag, R, Hambrick, DC & Chen, MJ 2005, What is strategic management, really? A consensus view on the essence of the field. in Academy of Management 2005 Annual Meeting: A New Vision of Management in the 21st Century, AOM 2005. 65th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2005, Honolulu, HI, United States, 8/5/05.

What is strategic management, really? A consensus view on the essence of the field. / Nag, Rajiv; Hambrick, Donald C.; Chen, Ming Jer.

Academy of Management 2005 Annual Meeting: A New Vision of Management in the 21st Century, AOM 2005. 2005.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - What is strategic management, really? A consensus view on the essence of the field

AU - Nag, Rajiv

AU - Hambrick, Donald C.

AU - Chen, Ming Jer

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - What is strategic management really about? In spite of 25 years of vibrant growth, the essence of the field of strategic management is highly ambiguous. It is commonly asserted that the field is fragmented and lacks a distinct identity. These skepticisms and concerns, however, are paradoxically at odds with the great success that strategic management has enjoyed in recent years. How might one explain this paradox? We argue that strategic management scholars share a common albeit implicit understanding of what their field is all about- a consensus that is reflected in the language they use. In this paper, we adopt a linguistic perspective to extract the distinctive lexicon of the field, and through that lexicon we impute the consensual definition of the field of strategic management. We hope that our efforts will help consolidate the gains of the field as well as promote new introspection about what our field is, compared to what we want it to be.

AB - What is strategic management really about? In spite of 25 years of vibrant growth, the essence of the field of strategic management is highly ambiguous. It is commonly asserted that the field is fragmented and lacks a distinct identity. These skepticisms and concerns, however, are paradoxically at odds with the great success that strategic management has enjoyed in recent years. How might one explain this paradox? We argue that strategic management scholars share a common albeit implicit understanding of what their field is all about- a consensus that is reflected in the language they use. In this paper, we adopt a linguistic perspective to extract the distinctive lexicon of the field, and through that lexicon we impute the consensual definition of the field of strategic management. We hope that our efforts will help consolidate the gains of the field as well as promote new introspection about what our field is, compared to what we want it to be.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859039595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859039595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - Academy of Management 2005 Annual Meeting: A New Vision of Management in the 21st Century, AOM 2005

ER -

Nag R, Hambrick DC, Chen MJ. What is strategic management, really? A consensus view on the essence of the field. In Academy of Management 2005 Annual Meeting: A New Vision of Management in the 21st Century, AOM 2005. 2005