What is the Right Thing to Say? Agreement among Perceivers on the Supportiveness of Statements

Shawna M. Tanner, Brian Lakey, Jay L. Cohen, Erina Lynne Macgeorge, Ruth Anne Clark, Sarah Stewart, Lakesha Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Most social support theory implies that there are objectively supportive people and statements. Yet there is little agreement among perceivers that some people are more supportive than others. Nonetheless, there might be better agreement regarding supportive statements. In three studies, children, college students, and members of a clinical training program rated the supportiveness of specific statements presented by text or video. Agreement among perceivers accounted for only 11% of the variance (range = 8%–12%). Perceivers disagreed because of their traitlike perceptual biases, as well as perceivers’ idiosyncratic tastes. Implications for social support theory were discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-339
Number of pages11
Journalbasic and applied social psychology
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 3 2018

Fingerprint

Social Support
Students
Education
Social Theory

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Tanner, Shawna M. ; Lakey, Brian ; Cohen, Jay L. ; Macgeorge, Erina Lynne ; Clark, Ruth Anne ; Stewart, Sarah ; Robinson, Lakesha. / What is the Right Thing to Say? Agreement among Perceivers on the Supportiveness of Statements. In: basic and applied social psychology. 2018 ; Vol. 40, No. 5. pp. 329-339.
@article{a214d7273e1647ebbf2964ffdca55315,
title = "What is the Right Thing to Say? Agreement among Perceivers on the Supportiveness of Statements",
abstract = "Most social support theory implies that there are objectively supportive people and statements. Yet there is little agreement among perceivers that some people are more supportive than others. Nonetheless, there might be better agreement regarding supportive statements. In three studies, children, college students, and members of a clinical training program rated the supportiveness of specific statements presented by text or video. Agreement among perceivers accounted for only 11{\%} of the variance (range = 8{\%}–12{\%}). Perceivers disagreed because of their traitlike perceptual biases, as well as perceivers’ idiosyncratic tastes. Implications for social support theory were discussed.",
author = "Tanner, {Shawna M.} and Brian Lakey and Cohen, {Jay L.} and Macgeorge, {Erina Lynne} and Clark, {Ruth Anne} and Sarah Stewart and Lakesha Robinson",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/01973533.2018.1509341",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "329--339",
journal = "Basic and Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0197-3533",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

What is the Right Thing to Say? Agreement among Perceivers on the Supportiveness of Statements. / Tanner, Shawna M.; Lakey, Brian; Cohen, Jay L.; Macgeorge, Erina Lynne; Clark, Ruth Anne; Stewart, Sarah; Robinson, Lakesha.

In: basic and applied social psychology, Vol. 40, No. 5, 03.09.2018, p. 329-339.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the Right Thing to Say? Agreement among Perceivers on the Supportiveness of Statements

AU - Tanner, Shawna M.

AU - Lakey, Brian

AU - Cohen, Jay L.

AU - Macgeorge, Erina Lynne

AU - Clark, Ruth Anne

AU - Stewart, Sarah

AU - Robinson, Lakesha

PY - 2018/9/3

Y1 - 2018/9/3

N2 - Most social support theory implies that there are objectively supportive people and statements. Yet there is little agreement among perceivers that some people are more supportive than others. Nonetheless, there might be better agreement regarding supportive statements. In three studies, children, college students, and members of a clinical training program rated the supportiveness of specific statements presented by text or video. Agreement among perceivers accounted for only 11% of the variance (range = 8%–12%). Perceivers disagreed because of their traitlike perceptual biases, as well as perceivers’ idiosyncratic tastes. Implications for social support theory were discussed.

AB - Most social support theory implies that there are objectively supportive people and statements. Yet there is little agreement among perceivers that some people are more supportive than others. Nonetheless, there might be better agreement regarding supportive statements. In three studies, children, college students, and members of a clinical training program rated the supportiveness of specific statements presented by text or video. Agreement among perceivers accounted for only 11% of the variance (range = 8%–12%). Perceivers disagreed because of their traitlike perceptual biases, as well as perceivers’ idiosyncratic tastes. Implications for social support theory were discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055106872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055106872&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01973533.2018.1509341

DO - 10.1080/01973533.2018.1509341

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85055106872

VL - 40

SP - 329

EP - 339

JO - Basic and Applied Social Psychology

JF - Basic and Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0197-3533

IS - 5

ER -