What motivates people to participate more in community-based coalitions?

Rebecca Wells, Ann J. Ward, Mark Ethan Feinberg, Jeffrey A. Alexander

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify potential opportunities for improving member participation in community-based coalitions. We hypothesized that opportunities for influence and process competence would each foster higher levels of individual member participation. We tested these hypotheses in a sample of 818 members within 79 youth-oriented coalitions. Opportunities for influence were measured as members' perceptions of an inclusive board leadership style and members' reported committee roles. Coalition process competence was measured through member perceptions of strategic board directedness and meeting effectiveness. Members reported three types of participation within meetings as well as how much time they devoted to coalition business beyond meetings. Generalized linear models accommodated clustering of individuals within coalitions. Opportunities for influence were associated with individuals' participation both within and beyond meetings. Coalition process competence was not associated with participation. These results suggest that leadership inclusivity rather than process competence may best facilitate member participation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)94-104
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Community Psychology
Volume42
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2008

Fingerprint

Mental Competency
coalition
community
participation
Committee Membership
Cluster Analysis
Linear Models
leadership
linear model

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health(social science)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Wells, Rebecca ; Ward, Ann J. ; Feinberg, Mark Ethan ; Alexander, Jeffrey A. / What motivates people to participate more in community-based coalitions?. In: American Journal of Community Psychology. 2008 ; Vol. 42, No. 1-2. pp. 94-104.
@article{9dc64917b8134684ac319028c8c901dc,
title = "What motivates people to participate more in community-based coalitions?",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to identify potential opportunities for improving member participation in community-based coalitions. We hypothesized that opportunities for influence and process competence would each foster higher levels of individual member participation. We tested these hypotheses in a sample of 818 members within 79 youth-oriented coalitions. Opportunities for influence were measured as members' perceptions of an inclusive board leadership style and members' reported committee roles. Coalition process competence was measured through member perceptions of strategic board directedness and meeting effectiveness. Members reported three types of participation within meetings as well as how much time they devoted to coalition business beyond meetings. Generalized linear models accommodated clustering of individuals within coalitions. Opportunities for influence were associated with individuals' participation both within and beyond meetings. Coalition process competence was not associated with participation. These results suggest that leadership inclusivity rather than process competence may best facilitate member participation.",
author = "Rebecca Wells and Ward, {Ann J.} and Feinberg, {Mark Ethan} and Alexander, {Jeffrey A.}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10464-008-9182-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "94--104",
journal = "American Journal of Community Psychology",
issn = "0091-0562",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1-2",

}

What motivates people to participate more in community-based coalitions? / Wells, Rebecca; Ward, Ann J.; Feinberg, Mark Ethan; Alexander, Jeffrey A.

In: American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 42, No. 1-2, 01.09.2008, p. 94-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - What motivates people to participate more in community-based coalitions?

AU - Wells, Rebecca

AU - Ward, Ann J.

AU - Feinberg, Mark Ethan

AU - Alexander, Jeffrey A.

PY - 2008/9/1

Y1 - 2008/9/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to identify potential opportunities for improving member participation in community-based coalitions. We hypothesized that opportunities for influence and process competence would each foster higher levels of individual member participation. We tested these hypotheses in a sample of 818 members within 79 youth-oriented coalitions. Opportunities for influence were measured as members' perceptions of an inclusive board leadership style and members' reported committee roles. Coalition process competence was measured through member perceptions of strategic board directedness and meeting effectiveness. Members reported three types of participation within meetings as well as how much time they devoted to coalition business beyond meetings. Generalized linear models accommodated clustering of individuals within coalitions. Opportunities for influence were associated with individuals' participation both within and beyond meetings. Coalition process competence was not associated with participation. These results suggest that leadership inclusivity rather than process competence may best facilitate member participation.

AB - The purpose of this study was to identify potential opportunities for improving member participation in community-based coalitions. We hypothesized that opportunities for influence and process competence would each foster higher levels of individual member participation. We tested these hypotheses in a sample of 818 members within 79 youth-oriented coalitions. Opportunities for influence were measured as members' perceptions of an inclusive board leadership style and members' reported committee roles. Coalition process competence was measured through member perceptions of strategic board directedness and meeting effectiveness. Members reported three types of participation within meetings as well as how much time they devoted to coalition business beyond meetings. Generalized linear models accommodated clustering of individuals within coalitions. Opportunities for influence were associated with individuals' participation both within and beyond meetings. Coalition process competence was not associated with participation. These results suggest that leadership inclusivity rather than process competence may best facilitate member participation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50249099187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50249099187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10464-008-9182-z

DO - 10.1007/s10464-008-9182-z

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 94

EP - 104

JO - American Journal of Community Psychology

JF - American Journal of Community Psychology

SN - 0091-0562

IS - 1-2

ER -