What's in a relationship? An examination of social capital, race and class in mentoring relationships

Steven Michael Gaddis, Jr.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

After 25 years of intense scrutiny, social capital remains an important yet highly debated concept in social science research. This research uses data from youth and mentors in several chapters of Big Brothers/Big Sisters to assess the importance of different mentoring relationship characteristics in creating positive outcomes among youths. The literature on social capital suggests that key characteristics are: (1. the amount of time spent between individuals, (2. racial similarity, (3. level of trust, (4. social class difference, and (5. intergenerational closure. I examine the effects of these social capital measures on academic and deviant behavioral outcomes and run models using propensity score weights to address selection bias. The results indicate that both the amount of time spent in a relationship and the level of trust consistently have positive effects for youths. Counter to what some theory suggests, race-matching and closure between parent and mentor have limited effects, and social class difference between individuals has no significant effect on any of the examined outcomes. These findings have important implications for future work on social capital and adolescent relationships in general.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbersos003
Pages (from-to)1237-1269
Number of pages33
JournalSocial Forces
Volume90
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'What's in a relationship? An examination of social capital, race and class in mentoring relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this