What's the problem? How 'industrial culture' shapes community responses to proposed bioenergy development in northern Michigan, USA

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Why do two similar places respond to the same renewable energy technology development proposal in contrasting ways - as a problem in one community, and a non-problem in the other? In response to William Freudenburg's call to examine the role of ideologies in the social construction of both environmental problems and non-problems, and drawing from Ann Swidler's concept of cultural resources, this paper develops and applies an integrative framework the author calls industrial culture. The paper examines how industrial cultures - the stories, discourses, orientations, and practices around industrial development and accompanying environmental degradation that are commonplace in particular locales - shape community responses to proposed future development by both constraining and providing opportunities for new trajectories of action. This process is illustrated with a comparative case study of two adjacent and outwardly similar industrialized northern Michigan communities with legacies of environmental degradation that encounter the same bioenergy development proposal but respond in contrasting ways. Findings suggest community residents construct industrial cultures around both a) past industrial development and environmental degradation and b) the imagined future impact bioenergy development would have on the community. The paper extends the literature on environmental non-problems by showing how the social construction of non-problems is driven not only by explicitly articulated ideologies, but also by unquestioned common sense.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)76-87
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume45
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

industrial culture
bioenergy
community response
environmental degradation
social construction
industrial development
ideology
environmental damage
community
technological development
Ideologies
comparative study
energy technology
trajectory
renewable energy
resource
environmental impact
resident
discourse
resources

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{58f3e2410eb44fa38bdd340c7d09f6d9,
title = "What's the problem? How 'industrial culture' shapes community responses to proposed bioenergy development in northern Michigan, USA",
abstract = "Why do two similar places respond to the same renewable energy technology development proposal in contrasting ways - as a problem in one community, and a non-problem in the other? In response to William Freudenburg's call to examine the role of ideologies in the social construction of both environmental problems and non-problems, and drawing from Ann Swidler's concept of cultural resources, this paper develops and applies an integrative framework the author calls industrial culture. The paper examines how industrial cultures - the stories, discourses, orientations, and practices around industrial development and accompanying environmental degradation that are commonplace in particular locales - shape community responses to proposed future development by both constraining and providing opportunities for new trajectories of action. This process is illustrated with a comparative case study of two adjacent and outwardly similar industrialized northern Michigan communities with legacies of environmental degradation that encounter the same bioenergy development proposal but respond in contrasting ways. Findings suggest community residents construct industrial cultures around both a) past industrial development and environmental degradation and b) the imagined future impact bioenergy development would have on the community. The paper extends the literature on environmental non-problems by showing how the social construction of non-problems is driven not only by explicitly articulated ideologies, but also by unquestioned common sense.",
author = "Weston Eaton",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.02.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "76--87",
journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
issn = "0743-0167",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What's the problem? How 'industrial culture' shapes community responses to proposed bioenergy development in northern Michigan, USA

AU - Eaton, Weston

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Why do two similar places respond to the same renewable energy technology development proposal in contrasting ways - as a problem in one community, and a non-problem in the other? In response to William Freudenburg's call to examine the role of ideologies in the social construction of both environmental problems and non-problems, and drawing from Ann Swidler's concept of cultural resources, this paper develops and applies an integrative framework the author calls industrial culture. The paper examines how industrial cultures - the stories, discourses, orientations, and practices around industrial development and accompanying environmental degradation that are commonplace in particular locales - shape community responses to proposed future development by both constraining and providing opportunities for new trajectories of action. This process is illustrated with a comparative case study of two adjacent and outwardly similar industrialized northern Michigan communities with legacies of environmental degradation that encounter the same bioenergy development proposal but respond in contrasting ways. Findings suggest community residents construct industrial cultures around both a) past industrial development and environmental degradation and b) the imagined future impact bioenergy development would have on the community. The paper extends the literature on environmental non-problems by showing how the social construction of non-problems is driven not only by explicitly articulated ideologies, but also by unquestioned common sense.

AB - Why do two similar places respond to the same renewable energy technology development proposal in contrasting ways - as a problem in one community, and a non-problem in the other? In response to William Freudenburg's call to examine the role of ideologies in the social construction of both environmental problems and non-problems, and drawing from Ann Swidler's concept of cultural resources, this paper develops and applies an integrative framework the author calls industrial culture. The paper examines how industrial cultures - the stories, discourses, orientations, and practices around industrial development and accompanying environmental degradation that are commonplace in particular locales - shape community responses to proposed future development by both constraining and providing opportunities for new trajectories of action. This process is illustrated with a comparative case study of two adjacent and outwardly similar industrialized northern Michigan communities with legacies of environmental degradation that encounter the same bioenergy development proposal but respond in contrasting ways. Findings suggest community residents construct industrial cultures around both a) past industrial development and environmental degradation and b) the imagined future impact bioenergy development would have on the community. The paper extends the literature on environmental non-problems by showing how the social construction of non-problems is driven not only by explicitly articulated ideologies, but also by unquestioned common sense.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962508364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962508364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.02.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.02.014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84962508364

VL - 45

SP - 76

EP - 87

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

ER -