When a Veterans’ Treatment Court Fails: Lessons Learned from a Qualitative Evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

More than 500 veterans treatment courts (VTCs) provide thousands of eligible veterans across the nation alternative means of resolving criminal charges through a therapeutic, judicially supervised programs. The majority of those VTCs mandate that veteran participants work with a volunteer veteran mentor throughout their tenure in VTC programs. Mentoring has been heralded as a critical and valuable component of VTCs, and it is believed that mentoring discourages substance abuse and promotes adherence to substance abuse interventions. But very little is known about how mentoring actually works. Scant research documents how mentors interact with mentees, what their responsibilities are, or what impact they have on veterans’ progress through rigorous VTC protocols. Through interview data collected following the death of a veteran mentee in a northeastern Study VTC, this research provides in-depth analysis of how mentors and mentees understand their responsibilities with respect to illicit substance use and violations of VTCs’ sobriety requirements. This article provides background data on VTCs and veterans who participate in them, then explores interview and documentary data as part of a case study of a policy failure in the Study VTC. The article concludes with recommendations that could improve mentor/mentee relationships and VTC participants’ access to treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)322-343
Number of pages22
JournalVictims and Offenders
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2019

Fingerprint

Veterans
evaluation
Mentors
mentoring
Therapeutics
substance abuse
charge
responsibility
Substance-Related Disorders
interview
Interviews
death
Clinical Protocols
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Health(social science)
  • Applied Psychology
  • Law

Cite this

@article{15043f67b7e7491db96ab4f517cc1073,
title = "When a Veterans’ Treatment Court Fails: Lessons Learned from a Qualitative Evaluation",
abstract = "More than 500 veterans treatment courts (VTCs) provide thousands of eligible veterans across the nation alternative means of resolving criminal charges through a therapeutic, judicially supervised programs. The majority of those VTCs mandate that veteran participants work with a volunteer veteran mentor throughout their tenure in VTC programs. Mentoring has been heralded as a critical and valuable component of VTCs, and it is believed that mentoring discourages substance abuse and promotes adherence to substance abuse interventions. But very little is known about how mentoring actually works. Scant research documents how mentors interact with mentees, what their responsibilities are, or what impact they have on veterans’ progress through rigorous VTC protocols. Through interview data collected following the death of a veteran mentee in a northeastern Study VTC, this research provides in-depth analysis of how mentors and mentees understand their responsibilities with respect to illicit substance use and violations of VTCs’ sobriety requirements. This article provides background data on VTCs and veterans who participate in them, then explores interview and documentary data as part of a case study of a policy failure in the Study VTC. The article concludes with recommendations that could improve mentor/mentee relationships and VTC participants’ access to treatment.",
author = "Douds, {Anne S.} and {Hummer, II}, {Donald Charles}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/15564886.2019.1595248",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "322--343",
journal = "Victims and Offenders",
issn = "1556-4886",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

When a Veterans’ Treatment Court Fails : Lessons Learned from a Qualitative Evaluation. / Douds, Anne S.; Hummer, II, Donald Charles.

In: Victims and Offenders, Vol. 14, No. 3, 03.04.2019, p. 322-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - When a Veterans’ Treatment Court Fails

T2 - Lessons Learned from a Qualitative Evaluation

AU - Douds, Anne S.

AU - Hummer, II, Donald Charles

PY - 2019/4/3

Y1 - 2019/4/3

N2 - More than 500 veterans treatment courts (VTCs) provide thousands of eligible veterans across the nation alternative means of resolving criminal charges through a therapeutic, judicially supervised programs. The majority of those VTCs mandate that veteran participants work with a volunteer veteran mentor throughout their tenure in VTC programs. Mentoring has been heralded as a critical and valuable component of VTCs, and it is believed that mentoring discourages substance abuse and promotes adherence to substance abuse interventions. But very little is known about how mentoring actually works. Scant research documents how mentors interact with mentees, what their responsibilities are, or what impact they have on veterans’ progress through rigorous VTC protocols. Through interview data collected following the death of a veteran mentee in a northeastern Study VTC, this research provides in-depth analysis of how mentors and mentees understand their responsibilities with respect to illicit substance use and violations of VTCs’ sobriety requirements. This article provides background data on VTCs and veterans who participate in them, then explores interview and documentary data as part of a case study of a policy failure in the Study VTC. The article concludes with recommendations that could improve mentor/mentee relationships and VTC participants’ access to treatment.

AB - More than 500 veterans treatment courts (VTCs) provide thousands of eligible veterans across the nation alternative means of resolving criminal charges through a therapeutic, judicially supervised programs. The majority of those VTCs mandate that veteran participants work with a volunteer veteran mentor throughout their tenure in VTC programs. Mentoring has been heralded as a critical and valuable component of VTCs, and it is believed that mentoring discourages substance abuse and promotes adherence to substance abuse interventions. But very little is known about how mentoring actually works. Scant research documents how mentors interact with mentees, what their responsibilities are, or what impact they have on veterans’ progress through rigorous VTC protocols. Through interview data collected following the death of a veteran mentee in a northeastern Study VTC, this research provides in-depth analysis of how mentors and mentees understand their responsibilities with respect to illicit substance use and violations of VTCs’ sobriety requirements. This article provides background data on VTCs and veterans who participate in them, then explores interview and documentary data as part of a case study of a policy failure in the Study VTC. The article concludes with recommendations that could improve mentor/mentee relationships and VTC participants’ access to treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064567760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064567760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15564886.2019.1595248

DO - 10.1080/15564886.2019.1595248

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064567760

VL - 14

SP - 322

EP - 343

JO - Victims and Offenders

JF - Victims and Offenders

SN - 1556-4886

IS - 3

ER -