When Cheap Isn't the Same as Not Expensive: Generic Price Terms and Their Negations

Bert Weijters, Elke Cabooter, Hans Baumgartner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Generic price terms such as cheap, not expensive, not cheap, and expensive are used frequently in marketing, but little is known about how consumers interpret them. In typical consumer contexts, in which lower prices are preferred, we find that not cheap means essentially the same as expensive (i.e., not cheap = expensive). In contrast, not expensive does not mean the same as cheap, in that cheap is associated with lower prices (i.e., cheap < not expensive). As an implication, in a consumer survey we find different response distributions for rating scales that are anchored with endpoint labels of not expensive versus expensive as compared to cheap versus expensive or cheap versus not cheap (the latter two are equivalent). Furthermore, although cheap is associated with lower prices than not expensive, this does not necessarily translate into higher preferences for options that are described as cheap (vs. not expensive), because cheap may also evoke negative quality perceptions. Finally, we demonstrate an interesting reversal in the way price terms are interpreted: when higher prices are preferred, cheap is equal to not expensive (i.e., cheap = not expensive), whereas not cheap is associated with lower prices than expensive (i.e., not cheap < expensive).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)543-559
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Consumer Psychology
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Marketing
Surveys and Questionnaires
Consumer survey
Reversal
Rating scales
Quality perception

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{23cacabfb15f476a852b9bc6ca3ad0fb,
title = "When Cheap Isn't the Same as Not Expensive: Generic Price Terms and Their Negations",
abstract = "Generic price terms such as cheap, not expensive, not cheap, and expensive are used frequently in marketing, but little is known about how consumers interpret them. In typical consumer contexts, in which lower prices are preferred, we find that not cheap means essentially the same as expensive (i.e., not cheap = expensive). In contrast, not expensive does not mean the same as cheap, in that cheap is associated with lower prices (i.e., cheap < not expensive). As an implication, in a consumer survey we find different response distributions for rating scales that are anchored with endpoint labels of not expensive versus expensive as compared to cheap versus expensive or cheap versus not cheap (the latter two are equivalent). Furthermore, although cheap is associated with lower prices than not expensive, this does not necessarily translate into higher preferences for options that are described as cheap (vs. not expensive), because cheap may also evoke negative quality perceptions. Finally, we demonstrate an interesting reversal in the way price terms are interpreted: when higher prices are preferred, cheap is equal to not expensive (i.e., cheap = not expensive), whereas not cheap is associated with lower prices than expensive (i.e., not cheap < expensive).",
author = "Bert Weijters and Elke Cabooter and Hans Baumgartner",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1002/jcpy.1041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "543--559",
journal = "Journal of Consumer Psychology",
issn = "1057-7408",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

When Cheap Isn't the Same as Not Expensive : Generic Price Terms and Their Negations. / Weijters, Bert; Cabooter, Elke; Baumgartner, Hans.

In: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 4, 10.2018, p. 543-559.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - When Cheap Isn't the Same as Not Expensive

T2 - Generic Price Terms and Their Negations

AU - Weijters, Bert

AU - Cabooter, Elke

AU - Baumgartner, Hans

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - Generic price terms such as cheap, not expensive, not cheap, and expensive are used frequently in marketing, but little is known about how consumers interpret them. In typical consumer contexts, in which lower prices are preferred, we find that not cheap means essentially the same as expensive (i.e., not cheap = expensive). In contrast, not expensive does not mean the same as cheap, in that cheap is associated with lower prices (i.e., cheap < not expensive). As an implication, in a consumer survey we find different response distributions for rating scales that are anchored with endpoint labels of not expensive versus expensive as compared to cheap versus expensive or cheap versus not cheap (the latter two are equivalent). Furthermore, although cheap is associated with lower prices than not expensive, this does not necessarily translate into higher preferences for options that are described as cheap (vs. not expensive), because cheap may also evoke negative quality perceptions. Finally, we demonstrate an interesting reversal in the way price terms are interpreted: when higher prices are preferred, cheap is equal to not expensive (i.e., cheap = not expensive), whereas not cheap is associated with lower prices than expensive (i.e., not cheap < expensive).

AB - Generic price terms such as cheap, not expensive, not cheap, and expensive are used frequently in marketing, but little is known about how consumers interpret them. In typical consumer contexts, in which lower prices are preferred, we find that not cheap means essentially the same as expensive (i.e., not cheap = expensive). In contrast, not expensive does not mean the same as cheap, in that cheap is associated with lower prices (i.e., cheap < not expensive). As an implication, in a consumer survey we find different response distributions for rating scales that are anchored with endpoint labels of not expensive versus expensive as compared to cheap versus expensive or cheap versus not cheap (the latter two are equivalent). Furthermore, although cheap is associated with lower prices than not expensive, this does not necessarily translate into higher preferences for options that are described as cheap (vs. not expensive), because cheap may also evoke negative quality perceptions. Finally, we demonstrate an interesting reversal in the way price terms are interpreted: when higher prices are preferred, cheap is equal to not expensive (i.e., cheap = not expensive), whereas not cheap is associated with lower prices than expensive (i.e., not cheap < expensive).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045243966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045243966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jcpy.1041

DO - 10.1002/jcpy.1041

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045243966

VL - 28

SP - 543

EP - 559

JO - Journal of Consumer Psychology

JF - Journal of Consumer Psychology

SN - 1057-7408

IS - 4

ER -