When Good Characters Do Bad Things: Examining the Effect of Moral Ambiguity on Enjoyment

K. Maja Krakowiak, Mary Beth Oliver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Some of the most compelling characters are morally ambiguous, but little research has examined these characters. This study (N = 313) empirically tests the effects of good, bad, and morally ambiguous characters (MACs) on audience responses. Findings of an experiment reveal that different character types are appealing for different reasons. Specifically, good characters are enjoyed because they are well liked; bad characters are liked the least, but they are equally as transporting, suspenseful, and thus cognitively engaging as other characters. MACs, on the other hand, are liked less than good characters, but they are nevertheless equally as transporting, suspenseful, cognitively engaging, and thereby enjoyable as good characters. The implications of these findings on various media effects theories are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-135
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Communication
Volume62
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2012

Fingerprint

Experiments
experiment
Enjoyment

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{ed4adf2c09b5497e950aa035ddb4c1d8,
title = "When Good Characters Do Bad Things: Examining the Effect of Moral Ambiguity on Enjoyment",
abstract = "Some of the most compelling characters are morally ambiguous, but little research has examined these characters. This study (N = 313) empirically tests the effects of good, bad, and morally ambiguous characters (MACs) on audience responses. Findings of an experiment reveal that different character types are appealing for different reasons. Specifically, good characters are enjoyed because they are well liked; bad characters are liked the least, but they are equally as transporting, suspenseful, and thus cognitively engaging as other characters. MACs, on the other hand, are liked less than good characters, but they are nevertheless equally as transporting, suspenseful, cognitively engaging, and thereby enjoyable as good characters. The implications of these findings on various media effects theories are discussed.",
author = "Krakowiak, {K. Maja} and Oliver, {Mary Beth}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01618.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "117--135",
journal = "Journal of Communication",
issn = "0021-9916",
number = "1",

}

When Good Characters Do Bad Things : Examining the Effect of Moral Ambiguity on Enjoyment. / Krakowiak, K. Maja; Oliver, Mary Beth.

In: Journal of Communication, Vol. 62, No. 1, 01.02.2012, p. 117-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - When Good Characters Do Bad Things

T2 - Examining the Effect of Moral Ambiguity on Enjoyment

AU - Krakowiak, K. Maja

AU - Oliver, Mary Beth

PY - 2012/2/1

Y1 - 2012/2/1

N2 - Some of the most compelling characters are morally ambiguous, but little research has examined these characters. This study (N = 313) empirically tests the effects of good, bad, and morally ambiguous characters (MACs) on audience responses. Findings of an experiment reveal that different character types are appealing for different reasons. Specifically, good characters are enjoyed because they are well liked; bad characters are liked the least, but they are equally as transporting, suspenseful, and thus cognitively engaging as other characters. MACs, on the other hand, are liked less than good characters, but they are nevertheless equally as transporting, suspenseful, cognitively engaging, and thereby enjoyable as good characters. The implications of these findings on various media effects theories are discussed.

AB - Some of the most compelling characters are morally ambiguous, but little research has examined these characters. This study (N = 313) empirically tests the effects of good, bad, and morally ambiguous characters (MACs) on audience responses. Findings of an experiment reveal that different character types are appealing for different reasons. Specifically, good characters are enjoyed because they are well liked; bad characters are liked the least, but they are equally as transporting, suspenseful, and thus cognitively engaging as other characters. MACs, on the other hand, are liked less than good characters, but they are nevertheless equally as transporting, suspenseful, cognitively engaging, and thereby enjoyable as good characters. The implications of these findings on various media effects theories are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856528922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856528922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01618.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01618.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84856528922

VL - 62

SP - 117

EP - 135

JO - Journal of Communication

JF - Journal of Communication

SN - 0021-9916

IS - 1

ER -