When inclusion hurts: The role of valence in moderating the effects of being in the loop

Megan K. McCarty, Nicole Elizabeth Iannone, Eric E. Jones, Janice R. Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We explored conditions under which being in the loop may be an undesirable experience. We tested whether information valence moderates the effects of being in versus out of the loop in four studies. In a pilot study, participants imagined positive and negative events and indicated the degree to which they would like to know this information. In Study 1, participants imagined being in or out of the loop on positive or negative information and indicated how they would feel. In Study 2, participants relived an actual experience when they were in or out of the loop on positive or negative information. In Study 3, participants were in or out of the loop on positive or negative information needed for an upcoming task. These studies provide evidence that being in the loop on negative information can be an unenjoyable experience, threatening fundamental needs and increasing negative affect.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)93-108
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Social Psychology
Volume158
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

McCarty, Megan K. ; Iannone, Nicole Elizabeth ; Jones, Eric E. ; Kelly, Janice R. / When inclusion hurts : The role of valence in moderating the effects of being in the loop. In: Journal of Social Psychology. 2018 ; Vol. 158, No. 1. pp. 93-108.
@article{8a524d2261624cff81f3a2969fa8078a,
title = "When inclusion hurts: The role of valence in moderating the effects of being in the loop",
abstract = "We explored conditions under which being in the loop may be an undesirable experience. We tested whether information valence moderates the effects of being in versus out of the loop in four studies. In a pilot study, participants imagined positive and negative events and indicated the degree to which they would like to know this information. In Study 1, participants imagined being in or out of the loop on positive or negative information and indicated how they would feel. In Study 2, participants relived an actual experience when they were in or out of the loop on positive or negative information. In Study 3, participants were in or out of the loop on positive or negative information needed for an upcoming task. These studies provide evidence that being in the loop on negative information can be an unenjoyable experience, threatening fundamental needs and increasing negative affect.",
author = "McCarty, {Megan K.} and Iannone, {Nicole Elizabeth} and Jones, {Eric E.} and Kelly, {Janice R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/00224545.2017.1314247",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "158",
pages = "93--108",
journal = "Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-4545",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

When inclusion hurts : The role of valence in moderating the effects of being in the loop. / McCarty, Megan K.; Iannone, Nicole Elizabeth; Jones, Eric E.; Kelly, Janice R.

In: Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 158, No. 1, 02.01.2018, p. 93-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - When inclusion hurts

T2 - The role of valence in moderating the effects of being in the loop

AU - McCarty, Megan K.

AU - Iannone, Nicole Elizabeth

AU - Jones, Eric E.

AU - Kelly, Janice R.

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - We explored conditions under which being in the loop may be an undesirable experience. We tested whether information valence moderates the effects of being in versus out of the loop in four studies. In a pilot study, participants imagined positive and negative events and indicated the degree to which they would like to know this information. In Study 1, participants imagined being in or out of the loop on positive or negative information and indicated how they would feel. In Study 2, participants relived an actual experience when they were in or out of the loop on positive or negative information. In Study 3, participants were in or out of the loop on positive or negative information needed for an upcoming task. These studies provide evidence that being in the loop on negative information can be an unenjoyable experience, threatening fundamental needs and increasing negative affect.

AB - We explored conditions under which being in the loop may be an undesirable experience. We tested whether information valence moderates the effects of being in versus out of the loop in four studies. In a pilot study, participants imagined positive and negative events and indicated the degree to which they would like to know this information. In Study 1, participants imagined being in or out of the loop on positive or negative information and indicated how they would feel. In Study 2, participants relived an actual experience when they were in or out of the loop on positive or negative information. In Study 3, participants were in or out of the loop on positive or negative information needed for an upcoming task. These studies provide evidence that being in the loop on negative information can be an unenjoyable experience, threatening fundamental needs and increasing negative affect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019597219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019597219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00224545.2017.1314247

DO - 10.1080/00224545.2017.1314247

M3 - Article

C2 - 28375814

AN - SCOPUS:85019597219

VL - 158

SP - 93

EP - 108

JO - Journal of Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0022-4545

IS - 1

ER -