Where trends the law of the sea?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper is partly based on the response to a ques tionnaire sent to a number of experts on the law of the sea in order to find out whether there is any consensus about future trends in that area of international law. Actually, the results show quite a variety of viewpoints. The author also finds inter alia that books and articles that some years ago tried to forecast present-day trends are not too numerous and are in general disappointing. The following section deals with the UNCLOS III Draft Treaty on the Law of the Sea and posits three possible future outcomes: Complete failure to enter into force; entry into force with so few parties that global acceptance cannot be inferred; and entry into force with a vast majority of states signing and ratifying it, the last possibility being held to be the one most unlikely of materialization. The width of the coastal areas to be placed under national jurisdiction is also a contentious issue, made more difficult by the split between developed and developing states. In the author's opinion, conciliation is more probable now than it has been in the past, although the weight of the evidence suggests a more pessimistic future scenario. Another significant fact to be considered in the future is the emergence of perhaps as many as fifty new developing mini-states, all of which will be concerned with the law of the sea and the New.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-91
Number of pages31
JournalOcean Development and International Law
Volume10
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1981

Fingerprint

Law of the Sea
Law
trend
international law
treaty
jurisdiction
acceptance
expert
scenario
present
evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Development
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Law

Cite this

@article{3a3aec78e51e4fcb97b324f3c95e0a66,
title = "Where trends the law of the sea?",
abstract = "This paper is partly based on the response to a ques tionnaire sent to a number of experts on the law of the sea in order to find out whether there is any consensus about future trends in that area of international law. Actually, the results show quite a variety of viewpoints. The author also finds inter alia that books and articles that some years ago tried to forecast present-day trends are not too numerous and are in general disappointing. The following section deals with the UNCLOS III Draft Treaty on the Law of the Sea and posits three possible future outcomes: Complete failure to enter into force; entry into force with so few parties that global acceptance cannot be inferred; and entry into force with a vast majority of states signing and ratifying it, the last possibility being held to be the one most unlikely of materialization. The width of the coastal areas to be placed under national jurisdiction is also a contentious issue, made more difficult by the split between developed and developing states. In the author's opinion, conciliation is more probable now than it has been in the past, although the weight of the evidence suggests a more pessimistic future scenario. Another significant fact to be considered in the future is the emergence of perhaps as many as fifty new developing mini-states, all of which will be concerned with the law of the sea and the New.",
author = "{Gamble, Jr.}, {John K.}",
year = "1981",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00908328109545674",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "61--91",
journal = "Ocean Development and International Law",
issn = "0090-8320",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1-2",

}

Where trends the law of the sea? / Gamble, Jr., John K.

In: Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 10, No. 1-2, 01.01.1981, p. 61-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Where trends the law of the sea?

AU - Gamble, Jr., John K.

PY - 1981/1/1

Y1 - 1981/1/1

N2 - This paper is partly based on the response to a ques tionnaire sent to a number of experts on the law of the sea in order to find out whether there is any consensus about future trends in that area of international law. Actually, the results show quite a variety of viewpoints. The author also finds inter alia that books and articles that some years ago tried to forecast present-day trends are not too numerous and are in general disappointing. The following section deals with the UNCLOS III Draft Treaty on the Law of the Sea and posits three possible future outcomes: Complete failure to enter into force; entry into force with so few parties that global acceptance cannot be inferred; and entry into force with a vast majority of states signing and ratifying it, the last possibility being held to be the one most unlikely of materialization. The width of the coastal areas to be placed under national jurisdiction is also a contentious issue, made more difficult by the split between developed and developing states. In the author's opinion, conciliation is more probable now than it has been in the past, although the weight of the evidence suggests a more pessimistic future scenario. Another significant fact to be considered in the future is the emergence of perhaps as many as fifty new developing mini-states, all of which will be concerned with the law of the sea and the New.

AB - This paper is partly based on the response to a ques tionnaire sent to a number of experts on the law of the sea in order to find out whether there is any consensus about future trends in that area of international law. Actually, the results show quite a variety of viewpoints. The author also finds inter alia that books and articles that some years ago tried to forecast present-day trends are not too numerous and are in general disappointing. The following section deals with the UNCLOS III Draft Treaty on the Law of the Sea and posits three possible future outcomes: Complete failure to enter into force; entry into force with so few parties that global acceptance cannot be inferred; and entry into force with a vast majority of states signing and ratifying it, the last possibility being held to be the one most unlikely of materialization. The width of the coastal areas to be placed under national jurisdiction is also a contentious issue, made more difficult by the split between developed and developing states. In the author's opinion, conciliation is more probable now than it has been in the past, although the weight of the evidence suggests a more pessimistic future scenario. Another significant fact to be considered in the future is the emergence of perhaps as many as fifty new developing mini-states, all of which will be concerned with the law of the sea and the New.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953121071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953121071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00908328109545674

DO - 10.1080/00908328109545674

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84953121071

VL - 10

SP - 61

EP - 91

JO - Ocean Development and International Law

JF - Ocean Development and International Law

SN - 0090-8320

IS - 1-2

ER -